Why are all "vegans" such colossal, but inept, liars?

Why do "vegans" claim to be "minimizing" their animal
death toll, when

1) they have never calculated their toll
2) for virtually all of them, it is trivially easy
to show that they could even choose a different
vegetarian diet than the one they currently follow,
and realize a reduction in animal death
3) it is also trivially easy to show that there are
numerous meat-including diets they could follow that
cause less animal death and suffering than the
vegetarian diets they currently follow?


It begins to look obvious that the type of person who
is drawn to make a false moral claim based on what he
eats is also the type of person who blythely lies out
of ignorance and sanctimonious self flattery.

"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
news:YNgNb.9325$zj7.8925@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Why do "vegans" claim to be "minimizing" their animal
> death toll, when
>
> 1) they have never calculated their toll
> 2) for virtually all of them, it is trivially easy
> to show that they could even choose a different
> vegetarian diet than the one they currently follow,
> and realize a reduction in animal death
> 3) it is also trivially easy to show that there are
> numerous meat-including diets they could follow that
> cause less animal death and suffering than the
> vegetarian diets they currently follow?

"Calculated", "reduction", and "less" all imply the "counting game" that you
balked at in previous threads.

> It begins to look obvious that the type of person who
> is drawn to make a false moral claim based on what he
> eats is also the type of person who blythely lies out
> of ignorance and sanctimonious self flattery.

Why should anyone believe you when you have no substantive proof? You deny
the burden of proof because you know you would lose the "counting game".