"Trevor" <trev.DeleteThis@the.nomailplease.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.03.19.22.52.35.244267@the.nomailplease.com...
> Update
>
> The fish in question is no more
>
> I think it had stopped eating - I found it dead this morning
>
> Trev
Sorry for the loss. I suspected that this might occur. You mentioned
that the fungus was as a result of damage from other fish, but very
often, the other fish's attacks are because they know/sense that a fish
is weak & dying, and they are just hastened it along. Your treatment of
the symptoms (fungus) might not have addressed the root cause, and the
poor condition of the fish would probably not have made it a good
candidate for effective root cause identification & treatment. I've seen
this pattern before. The only fish really worthwhile to treat injuries
on, is one which was actively in battle for pecking order, mating rights
(or mechanical impact damage). Everyone else you have to suspect that
something else was wrong, and the tank-mates just knew about it before
you did.
My success rate of treating healthy fish which got sick (or mechanically
damaged) is about 90%, while my success rate for getting sick fish
healthy is about 10%. The distinction is as follows. A contagion hits a
stable tank, or mechanical damage affects an acclimated fish (success
rate is high). A single fish out of a healthy population falls ill
(especially with fish of the same species unaffected), or the fish
arrives with symptoms of concern (concave stomach, poor appetite, poor
color, atypical behaviour etc), then the success rate is very low. Yours
sounded like the odds were against him.
NetMax
>> Stay informed about: treating fungal infection