"The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period." Rick ..

"rick etter" <retterstop.RemoveThis@bright.net> wrote in message news:k7adnVD5bMaaByuiRVn-uw@bright.net...
> "Ipse dixit" <nospam.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote in message news:tPotb.995026$Id.138555@news.easynews.com...
> >
> > Here's the absolute denial we've all been waiting for.
> > Rick Etter firmly believes that no animals die during
> > the production of his grass fed beef.
> >
> > [start Ipse dixit]
> > > Then tell me how many collateral deaths are associated
> > > with the grass fed beef you eat. After that tell me if you
> > > accept that the *general* production, storage, and
> > > distribution of grass fed beef accumulates any collateral
> > > deaths.
> > ============================
> > Why? The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period.
> > [end]
> >
> > This is a strange claim indeed for someone who
> > spends hours a day trying to convince everyone
> > their food is responsible for them,
> ========================
> Not strange at all killer, true.
>
It's certainly hypocritical, because if you can claim
a part in your diet doesn't accumulate collateral
deaths, then you have no room to criticise vegans
for thinking the same.
>
> > and that the
> > electricity they use to post here causes them, but
> > what's even more strange is the silence from Dutch,
> > Jonathan Ball and Usual Suspect while he denies
> > the facts behind his food. As I said earlier, "The
> > CD argument holds a double standard", and Rick
> > has helped me prove it.
> ==================
> Nope.

Does this magical grass fed beef you eat slaughter
itself and then deliver itself to the supermarkets in
little packaged portions while dead? Does it do
all this by itself without the use of electricity or
transport?
 >> Stay informed about: "The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period." Rick .. 

"Ipse dixit" <nospam RemoveThis @email.com> wrote in message
news:FDJtb.1056826$Id.158566@news.easynews.com...
>
> "rick etter" <retterstop RemoveThis @bright.net> wrote in message
news:k7adnVD5bMaaByuiRVn-uw@bright.net...
> > "Ipse dixit" <nospam RemoveThis @email.com> wrote in message
news:tPotb.995026$Id.138555@news.easynews.com...
> > >
> > > Here's the absolute denial we've all been waiting for.
> > > Rick Etter firmly believes that no animals die during
> > > the production of his grass fed beef.
> > >
> > > [start Ipse dixit]
> > > > Then tell me how many collateral deaths are associated
> > > > with the grass fed beef you eat. After that tell me if you
> > > > accept that the *general* production, storage, and
> > > > distribution of grass fed beef accumulates any collateral
> > > > deaths.
> > > ============================
> > > Why? The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period.
> > > [end]
> > >
> > > This is a strange claim indeed for someone who
> > > spends hours a day trying to convince everyone
> > > their food is responsible for them,
> > ========================
> > Not strange at all killer, true.
> >
> It's certainly hypocritical,
====================
No it's not. Ive never denied that CDs take place for my diet, or that I am
not complicit.
*YOU* have. Every post, hypocrite...


because if you can claim
> a part in your diet doesn't accumulate collateral
> deaths, then you have no room to criticise vegans
> for thinking the same.
====================
Yes, because your diet does. I've never claimed that every bit of every
vegans diet causes CDs.
Yours does, because you prove here on usenet that you care nothing about
causing unnecessary animal death and suffering. You even dismiss your
complicity and claim, fraudulently, that your hands are somehow clean.
Using your twisted logic, *none* of us are responsible for CDs. It's all
somebody elses fault. There is *aways* room to criticize you twits. You're
about the most ignorant, dogmatic poster on usenet.



> >
> > > and that the
> > > electricity they use to post here causes them, but
> > > what's even more strange is the silence from Dutch,
> > > Jonathan Ball and Usual Suspect while he denies
> > > the facts behind his food. As I said earlier, "The
> > > CD argument holds a double standard", and Rick
> > > has helped me prove it.
> > ==================
> > Nope.
>
> Does this magical grass fed beef you eat slaughter
> itself and then deliver itself to the supermarkets in
> little packaged portions while dead? Does it do
> all this by itself without the use of electricity or
> transport?
============================
Nope. The production of the beef i eat causes no CDs.
Man, you're as stupid as I thought, even after I almost thought yesterday
that you had caught on to your idiotic question. Guess not, I should have
known you'd always be terminally ignorant.

Your continued unethical, unannotated snipping of posts noted, hypocrite...

Go have that nice blood-drenched dinner, killer...
>
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: "The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period." Rick .. 

"rick etter" <retterstop.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
news:boidnWKuwu5kMSqiRVn-iw@bright.net...
>
> "Ipse dixit" <nospam.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
> news:FDJtb.1056826$Id.158566@news.easynews.com...
> >
> > "rick etter" <retterstop.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> news:k7adnVD5bMaaByuiRVn-uw@bright.net...
> > > "Ipse dixit" <nospam.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
> news:tPotb.995026$Id.138555@news.easynews.com...
> > > >
> > > > Here's the absolute denial we've all been waiting for.
> > > > Rick Etter firmly believes that no animals die during
> > > > the production of his grass fed beef.
> > > >
> > > > [start Ipse dixit]
> > > > > Then tell me how many collateral deaths are associated
> > > > > with the grass fed beef you eat. After that tell me if you
> > > > > accept that the *general* production, storage, and
> > > > > distribution of grass fed beef accumulates any collateral
> > > > > deaths.
> > > > ============================
> > > > Why? The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period.
> > > > [end]
> > > >
> > > > This is a strange claim indeed for someone who
> > > > spends hours a day trying to convince everyone
> > > > their food is responsible for them,
> > > ========================
> > > Not strange at all killer, true.
> > >
> > It's certainly hypocritical,
> ====================
> No it's not. Ive never denied that CDs take place for my diet, or that I
am
> not complicit.
> *YOU* have. Every post, hypocrite...
>
>
> because if you can claim
> > a part in your diet doesn't accumulate collateral
> > deaths, then you have no room to criticise vegans
> > for thinking the same.
> ====================
> Yes, because your diet does. I've never claimed that every bit of every
> vegans diet causes CDs.
> Yours does, because you prove here on usenet that you care nothing about
> causing unnecessary animal death and suffering. You even dismiss your
> complicity and claim, fraudulently, that your hands are somehow clean.
> Using your twisted logic, *none* of us are responsible for CDs. It's all
> somebody elses fault. There is *aways* room to criticize you twits.
You're
> about the most ignorant, dogmatic poster on usenet.
>
>
>
> > >
> > > > and that the
> > > > electricity they use to post here causes them, but
> > > > what's even more strange is the silence from Dutch,
> > > > Jonathan Ball and Usual Suspect while he denies
> > > > the facts behind his food. As I said earlier, "The
> > > > CD argument holds a double standard", and Rick
> > > > has helped me prove it.
> > > ==================
> > > Nope.
> >
> > Does this magical grass fed beef you eat slaughter
> > itself and then deliver itself to the supermarkets in
> > little packaged portions while dead? Does it do
> > all this by itself without the use of electricity or
> > transport?
> ============================
> Nope. The production of the beef i eat causes no CDs.
> Man, you're as stupid as I thought, even after I almost thought yesterday
> that you had caught on to your idiotic question. Guess not, I should have
> known you'd always be terminally ignorant.
>
> Your continued unethical, unannotated snipping of posts noted,
hypocrite...
>
> Go have that nice blood-drenched dinner, killer...

I don't agree with you on almost anything Rick, but the snippage was unfair.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: "The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period." Rick .. 

"Ray" <camcompany.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bp8jdf$pbq$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>
> "rick etter" <retterstop.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> news:boidnWKuwu5kMSqiRVn-iw@bright.net...
> >
> > "Ipse dixit" <nospam.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
> > news:FDJtb.1056826$Id.158566@news.easynews.com...
> > >
> > > "rick etter" <retterstop.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> > news:k7adnVD5bMaaByuiRVn-uw@bright.net...
> > > > "Ipse dixit" <nospam.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message
> > news:tPotb.995026$Id.138555@news.easynews.com...
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's the absolute denial we've all been waiting for.
> > > > > Rick Etter firmly believes that no animals die during
> > > > > the production of his grass fed beef.
> > > > >
> > > > > [start Ipse dixit]
> > > > > > Then tell me how many collateral deaths are associated
> > > > > > with the grass fed beef you eat. After that tell me if you
> > > > > > accept that the *general* production, storage, and
> > > > > > distribution of grass fed beef accumulates any collateral
> > > > > > deaths.
> > > > > ============================
> > > > > Why? The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period.
> > > > > [end]
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a strange claim indeed for someone who
> > > > > spends hours a day trying to convince everyone
> > > > > their food is responsible for them,
> > > > ========================
> > > > Not strange at all killer, true.
> > > >
> > > It's certainly hypocritical,
> > ====================
> > No it's not. Ive never denied that CDs take place for my diet, or that
I
> am
> > not complicit.
> > *YOU* have. Every post, hypocrite...
> >
> >
> > because if you can claim
> > > a part in your diet doesn't accumulate collateral
> > > deaths, then you have no room to criticise vegans
> > > for thinking the same.
> > ====================
> > Yes, because your diet does. I've never claimed that every bit of every
> > vegans diet causes CDs.
> > Yours does, because you prove here on usenet that you care nothing about
> > causing unnecessary animal death and suffering. You even dismiss your
> > complicity and claim, fraudulently, that your hands are somehow clean.
> > Using your twisted logic, *none* of us are responsible for CDs. It's
all
> > somebody elses fault. There is *aways* room to criticize you twits.
> You're
> > about the most ignorant, dogmatic poster on usenet.
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > > and that the
> > > > > electricity they use to post here causes them, but
> > > > > what's even more strange is the silence from Dutch,
> > > > > Jonathan Ball and Usual Suspect while he denies
> > > > > the facts behind his food. As I said earlier, "The
> > > > > CD argument holds a double standard", and Rick
> > > > > has helped me prove it.
> > > > ==================
> > > > Nope.
> > >
> > > Does this magical grass fed beef you eat slaughter
> > > itself and then deliver itself to the supermarkets in
> > > little packaged portions while dead? Does it do
> > > all this by itself without the use of electricity or
> > > transport?
> > ============================
> > Nope. The production of the beef i eat causes no CDs.
> > Man, you're as stupid as I thought, even after I almost thought
yesterday
> > that you had caught on to your idiotic question. Guess not, I should
have
> > known you'd always be terminally ignorant.
> >
> > Your continued unethical, unannotated snipping of posts noted,
> hypocrite...
> >
> > Go have that nice blood-drenched dinner, killer...
>
> I don't agree with you on almost anything Rick, but the snippage was
unfair.
=====================
What's really, really great about it was that while he's doing that he's
complaining to Dutch!
 >> Stay informed about: "The production of my beef promotes no CDs. Period." Rick ..