Welcome to PetForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

This poster does not endorse arson

 
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights RSS
Related Topics:
WANTED GRAPHIC For Anti Hunting Poster - Need a blood stained image for a poster. Am so sick of those 59% of people agree with hunting posters , decided to add my own comments them : Am getting some laminates done with : is because : 76% of people want hunting with dogs to be illegal &quo
Next:  Animals Rights: Fw: Public hearings on factory farming, sign up to speak.  
Author Message
fishcantscream

External


Since: Feb 16, 2007
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 4:11 am
Post subject: This poster does not endorse arson
Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals (more info?)

This poster does not endorse arson which kills
small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds

but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
to their pocketbooks

 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
ontheroad

External


Since: Oct 01, 2006
Posts: 8



(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:21 am
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"fishcantscream" <nd3366 DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> This poster does not endorse arson which kills
> small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>
> but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
> to their pocketbooks
>========================
Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only killed people and
nothing else?
Does that about sum it up?

 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rupert

External


Since: May 01, 2006
Posts: 12



(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:48 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....RemoveThis@stop.com> wrote:
> "fishcantscream" <nd3....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...> This poster does not endorse arson which kills
> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>
> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
> > to their pocketbooks
> >========================
>
> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only killed people and
> nothing else?
> Does that about sum it up?

He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have never killed
any human being.
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rupert

External


Since: May 01, 2006
Posts: 12



(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:01 am
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 19, 3:17 pm, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
> >> "fishcantscream" <nd3....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...> This poster
> >> does not endorse arson which kills
> >> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>
> >> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
> >> > to their pocketbooks
> >> >========================
>
> >> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only killed people
> >> and
> >> nothing else?
> >> Does that about sum it up?
>
> > He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have never killed
> > any human being.
> >======================
>
> Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh killer?
>

You've no idea how amusingly ironic I find all these attempts to
denigrate my intelligence.

> read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the very implied
> statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no problem.

Absolute nonsense. He does not imply any such thing.

> Do try to keep up, fool...

God help me, you're a joke.

> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
ontheroad

External


Since: Oct 01, 2006
Posts: 8



(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 4:17 am
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Rupert" <rupertmccallum.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....DeleteThis@stop.com> wrote:
>> "fishcantscream" <nd3....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...> This poster
>> does not endorse arson which kills
>> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>>
>> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
>> > to their pocketbooks
>> >========================
>>
>> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only killed people
>> and
>> nothing else?
>> Does that about sum it up?
>
> He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have never killed
> any human being.
>======================
Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh killer?

read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the very implied
statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no problem.
Do try to keep up, fool...
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
rick

External


Since: Feb 06, 2005
Posts: 99



(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 12:47 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Rupert" <rupertmccallum.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1171882877.148614.153540@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 3:17 pm, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
>> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
>> >> "fishcantscream" <nd3....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...>
>> >>This poster
>> >> does not endorse arson which kills
>> >> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>>
>> >> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
>> >> > to their pocketbooks
>> >> >========================
>>
>> >> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only
>> >> killed people
>> >> and
>> >> nothing else?
>> >> Does that about sum it up?
>>
>> > He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have
>> > never killed
>> > any human being.
>> >======================
>>
>> Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh killer?
>>
>
> You've no idea how amusingly ironic I find all these attempts
> to
> denigrate my intelligence.
> ============================
I've no need to try, fool. You do that with each post....


>> read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the
>> very implied
>> statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no
>> problem.
>
> Absolute nonsense. He does not imply any such thing.
> =======================
Absolutelt true, fool...


>> Do try to keep up, fool...
>
> God help me, you're a joke.
=====================
Projecting, again, huh killer?


>
>> - Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rupert

External


Since: May 01, 2006
Posts: 12



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:30 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 19, 11:47 pm, "rick" <s....DeleteThis@stop.net> wrote:
> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1171882877.148614.153540@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 3:17 pm, "ontheroad" <s....DeleteThis@stop.com> wrote:
> >> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....DeleteThis@stop.com> wrote:
> >> >> "fishcantscream" <nd3....DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...>
> >> >>This poster
> >> >> does not endorse arson which kills
> >> >> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>
> >> >> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
> >> >> > to their pocketbooks
> >> >> >========================
>
> >> >> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it only
> >> >> killed people
> >> >> and
> >> >> nothing else?
> >> >> Does that about sum it up?
>
> >> > He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have
> >> > never killed
> >> > any human being.
> >> >======================
>
> >> Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh killer?
>
> > You've no idea how amusingly ironic I find all these attempts
> > to
> > denigrate my intelligence.
> > ============================
>
> I've no need to try, fool. You do that with each post....
>

In all seriousness, your contention below is really not very bright.
There really is not the slightest reason to suppose that he was in
some way implying that arson which kills humans is acceptable. He
didn't mention humans because the ALF's activities don't in fact kill
any humans. Given the egregious silliness of the mistake you are
making, your posturing is really quite comical. But I guess you're
incapable of understanding that. Never mind.

> >> read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the
> >> very implied
> >> statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no
> >> problem.
>
> > Absolute nonsense. He does not imply any such thing.
> > =======================
>
> Absolutelt true, fool...
>
> >> Do try to keep up, fool...
>
> > God help me, you're a joke.
>
> =====================
> Projecting, again, huh killer?
>
>
>
>
>
> >> - Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ronald 'More-More' Moshki

External


Since: May 05, 2006
Posts: 35



(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 5:25 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 19, 5:35 pm, "rick" <s....RemoveThis@stop.net> wrote:
> keep tap dancing away there foolish one...
>
> Again, the implication was there, and as I already proved to you,
> the hatred of people is part and parcel the vegan mindset here on
> usenet...
>
> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1171924216.951218.61070@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 11:47 pm, "rick" <s....RemoveThis@stop.net> wrote:
> >> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1171882877.148614.153540@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Feb 19, 3:17 pm, "ontheroad" <s....RemoveThis@stop.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....RemoveThis@stop.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> "fishcantscream" <nd3....RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >> >>news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...>
> >> >> >>This poster
> >> >> >> does not endorse arson which kills
> >> >> >> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>
> >> >> >> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
> >> >> >> > to their pocketbooks
> >> >> >> >========================
>
> >> >> >> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it
> >> >> >> only
> >> >> >> killed people
> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >> nothing else?
> >> >> >> Does that about sum it up?
>
> >> >> > He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have
> >> >> > never killed
> >> >> > any human being.
> >> >> >======================
>
> >> >> Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh
> >> >> killer?
>
> >> > You've no idea how amusingly ironic I find all these
> >> > attempts
> >> > to
> >> > denigrate my intelligence.
> >> > ============================
>
> >> I've no need to try, fool. You do that with each post....
>
> > In all seriousness, your contention below is really not very
> > bright.
> > There really is not the slightest reason to suppose that he was
> > in
> > some way implying that arson which kills humans is acceptable.
> > He
> > didn't mention humans because the ALF's activities don't in
> > fact kill
> > any humans. Given the egregious silliness of the mistake you
> > are
> > making, your posturing is really quite comical. But I guess
> > you're
> > incapable of understanding that. Never mind.
>
> >> >> read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the
> >> >> very implied
> >> >> statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no
> >> >> problem.
>
> >> > Absolute nonsense. He does not imply any such thing.
> >> > =======================
>
> >> Absolutelt true, fool...
>
> >> >> Do try to keep up, fool...
>
> >> > God help me, you're a joke.
>
> >> =====================
> >> Projecting, again, huh killer?
>
> >> >> - Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No, Rick Etter, we only hate the haters such
as yourself.

Rick "Canoe North" Etter--murdering
animals and the good guys just the same as always.
It's a time warp--1998 is still here.
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rupert

External


Since: May 01, 2006
Posts: 12



(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:23 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Feb 20, 9:35 am, "rick" <s....RemoveThis@stop.net> wrote:
> keep tap dancing away there foolish one...
>
> Again, the implication was there, and as I already proved to you,
> the hatred of people is part and parcel the vegan mindset here on
> usenet...
>

Dear, oh dear. You did not prove any such thing, and if you did it
would be a bit of a case of pot and kettle. The implication was not
there, as any twelve-year-old can see. And you like to cast aspersions
on other people's intelligence. Sheesh. I feel like a fool for even
bothering to talk to you.
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
rick

External


Since: Feb 06, 2005
Posts: 99



(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:35 pm
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

keep tap dancing away there foolish one...

Again, the implication was there, and as I already proved to you,
the hatred of people is part and parcel the vegan mindset here on
usenet...



"Rupert" <rupertmccallum.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1171924216.951218.61070@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 11:47 pm, "rick" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.net> wrote:
>> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1171882877.148614.153540@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 19, 3:17 pm, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
>> >> "Rupert" <rupertmccal....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:1171846115.248222.109570@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Feb 18, 11:21 am, "ontheroad" <s....TakeThisOut@stop.com> wrote:
>> >> >> "fishcantscream" <nd3....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>news:1171627876.577618.67110@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...>
>> >> >>This poster
>> >> >> does not endorse arson which kills
>> >> >> > small mammals, spiders, insects, groundnesting birds
>>
>> >> >> > but knows that vivisectors define violence as any harm
>> >> >> > to their pocketbooks
>> >> >> >========================
>>
>> >> >> Implied is that you COULD endorse arson as long as it
>> >> >> only
>> >> >> killed people
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> nothing else?
>> >> >> Does that about sum it up?
>>
>> >> > He's talking about the activities of the ALF, which have
>> >> > never killed
>> >> > any human being.
>> >> >======================
>>
>> >> Projecting your idiocy into what is said, again, huh
>> >> killer?
>>
>> > You've no idea how amusingly ironic I find all these
>> > attempts
>> > to
>> > denigrate my intelligence.
>> > ============================
>>
>> I've no need to try, fool. You do that with each post....
>>
>
> In all seriousness, your contention below is really not very
> bright.
> There really is not the slightest reason to suppose that he was
> in
> some way implying that arson which kills humans is acceptable.
> He
> didn't mention humans because the ALF's activities don't in
> fact kill
> any humans. Given the egregious silliness of the mistake you
> are
> making, your posturing is really quite comical. But I guess
> you're
> incapable of understanding that. Never mind.
>
>> >> read it again, he says arson that kills animals is bad, the
>> >> very implied
>> >> statement there is that if it happened to kill people, no
>> >> problem.
>>
>> > Absolute nonsense. He does not imply any such thing.
>> > =======================
>>
>> Absolutelt true, fool...
>>
>> >> Do try to keep up, fool...
>>
>> > God help me, you're a joke.
>>
>> =====================
>> Projecting, again, huh killer?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> - Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
rick

External


Since: Feb 06, 2005
Posts: 99



(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:35 am
Post subject: Re: This poster does not endorse arson [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ronald 'More-More' Moshki" <sector_four.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in
message

snip...

> It's a time warp--1998 is still here.
>=======================
And your stupidity is still running rampant. You'd think you
could at least learn something in all that time...
 >> Stay informed about: This poster does not endorse arson 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]