Zoe wrote:
> Joanne wrote:
>> Rosemary wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I just think there needs to be some hard evidence, not just
>>> anecdotal, before any operation is carried out.
<snip>
> Hard evidence.. how about some scientific studies to back up what
> Joanne is saying?
>
> http://www.ratbehavior.org/TumorSpaying.htm
>
> Have a read of that.
> (I don't think anyone has posted that link yet..) :)
I haven't seen the link before - thanks for posting it; I found it
interesting. Unfortunately, from what I read on the site, there don't
seem to have been any scientific studies to investigate the incidence of
tumours in spayed rats compared to unspayed rats and what effects it has
on average lifespan (I suspect that even a small number of deaths from
the spaying procedure might dramatically bring down the average lifespan
of spayed rats, but that isn't necessarily the best way to look at the
data from our point of view - perhaps a better approach would be to give
the average lifespan of the unspayed rat (which should be given
appropriate surgical and medical treatment to make the information
obtained relevant to pet rats), the average lifespan of the spayed rat,
and the percentage that die from the spaying procedure - although of
course this will vary from vet to vet). It would be really nice to have
the information, but without it the discussion can be at best
speculative. It seems we'll all just have to go with what each of us
individually think is best, and at least our rats will still be doing
better than the average Ratatouille-driven impulse purchase victim.
The film was damn good, though. Nothing like a full-on digital projector
in a cinema with great surround sound. I don't know if I'll ever be able
to go back to watching film-projected - er - films in the cinema.
Rosemary
>> Stay informed about: request your input for a marketing idea