|
Related Topics:
| Fuckwit David Harrison: never forget this - I have defined you here, Fuckwit. You helped me a lot, for which I would thank you if I thought you were a decent enough person to thank, but I defined you anyway. The David Harrison - Fuckwit - that people know is the David Fuckwit Harrison I defined.
David Fuckwit Harrison continues to stumble - Fuckwit - that's real name - will never learn. He keeps that he's in decent for farm animals, i.e., better lives rather than worse lives. He is not. What he's is life PER SE for farm animals. His language always betrays him. When Fuckwit
Predators, prey, and FUCKWIT David Harrison - Get this, FUCKWIT: If a predator kills a prey animal, there is no moral meaning to it. If you prevent a predator from killing prey, you have not done a good deed. Comparing our treatment of livestock to of prey is misguided at best, and stupid wh
Fuckwit David Harrison concedes error - it's not better for anything to live than not to Fuckwit David Harrison May 16, 2003 THAT'S ALL, Fuckwit. There's no further purpose served by your presence here, except as a target for mockery. You have spent nearly FIVE years here trying to p
Fuckwit David Harrison concedes error - it's not better for anything to live than not to Fuckwit David Harrison May 16, 2004 THAT'S ALL, Fuckwit. There's no further purpose served by your presence here, except as a target for mockery. You have spent nearly FIVE years here trying to persu
|
|
|
Next: Animals Rights: The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Feb 14, 2007
Posts: 32
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:29 pm
Post subject: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker)
Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)
|
|
|
Fuckwit David Harrison: "When 'ARAs' say things like:
No animals benefit from farming, what they *mean* is
that they believe the animals gain nothing from the
arrangement."
And the 'aras' are correct on that point. The animals
do *not* "gain" anything as a result of coming into
existence. They are not better off for having
existed, versus never having existed. Coming into
existence is not a "gain" or "benefit". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
|
Kickin' Goober's Faggot A
|
External
Since: Jun 18, 2007
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:43 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 18, 10:29 am, Rudy Canoza <rudy-can....RemoveThis@excite.com> wrote:
> Fuckwit David Harrison: "When 'ARAs' say things like:
> No animals benefit from farming, what they *mean* is
> that they believe the animals gain nothing from the
> arrangement."
>
> And the 'aras' are correct on that point. The animals
> do *not* "gain" anything as a result of coming into
> existence. They are not better off for having
> existed, versus never having existed. Coming into
> existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
Why are you talking to yourself Goo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 03, 2005
Posts: 408
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:43:23 -0700, Kickin' Goober's Faggot Ass <shrubkiller DeleteThis @excite.com> wrote:
>On Jun 18, 10:29 am, Rudy Canoza <rudy-can... DeleteThis @excite.com> wrote:
>> Fuckwit David Harrison: "When 'ARAs' say things like:
>> No animals benefit from farming, what they *mean* is
>> that they believe the animals gain nothing from the
>> arrangement."
>>
>> And the 'aras' are correct on that point. The animals
>> do *not* "gain" anything as a result of coming into
>> existence. They are not better off for having
>> existed, versus never having existed. Coming into
>> existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
>
>
>Why are you talking to yourself Goo?
Try getting the inept Goober to explain what he
thinks he's trying to talk about. It's impossible for
Goo to back up his absurd sounding claims, in
large part because he doesn't understand how he
thinks he disagrees with himself. Goo is obsessed
with his belief that before beings become animals
they are in some kind of "state of pre-existence":
"one has no knowledge of that state of pre-existence"
- Goo
and as we can see, sometimes Goobs feels that it's
a mysterious "state" that humans "cannot know"
about:
"EVEN WITH the very best animal welfare conditions one
might provide: they STILL might not be as good as the
"pre-existence" state was for the animals; one simply
cannot know." - Goo
"When the entity moves from "pre-existence" into the
existence we know, we don't know if that move improves
its welfare, degrades it, or leaves it unchanged.
Unless we know with certainty that the entity's welfare
improves when it moves from "pre-existence" into the
life we can detect, we cannot conclude that life is a
benefit to it." - Goo
At other times the Goober disagrees with himself
claiming that he *does* know, and insisting that the
"state of pre-existence" he obsesses about is better
than "the life we can detect", resulting in his absurd
claim that:
"NO animal "benefits" from coming into existence" - Goo
"Coming into existence is not a benefit to them: it does
not make them better off than before they existed." - Goo
But Goonicus just can't back any of it up. He can't
explain how he thinks he disagrees with himself,
or how he thinks he knows that which he claims
cannot be known. He also can't explain why he
thinks life has never been a benefit to anything,
without referring to his obsession about some sort
of "state of pre-existence". In fact we can get him
to prove that. I'll challenge him to explain, and he
will fail as he always does:
Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
life has never been a benefit to anything, without
referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence". >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 03, 2005
Posts: 408
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:52 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 14, 2007
Posts: 32
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:14 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:34 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 19, 2:02 pm, "Dutch" <n....DeleteThis@home.com> wrote:
> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>
> >>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> > Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
> > life has never been a benefit to anything, without
> > referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>
> If you didn't get it by now you never will.
Way to go Baby Goo!!!
You tell him! >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 108
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:02 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<dh@.> wrote in message news:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>
>>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
> life has never been a benefit to anything, without
> referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
If you didn't get it by now you never will. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
Sgt. Giggles of the Kamik
|
External
Since: Jun 20, 2007
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:32 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 19, 10:52 am, dh@. wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>
> >Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
> life has never been a benefit to anything, without
> referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
Goo has been waddling around Pasadena bellowing a song he wrote
all.by.himself. in the hopes a music producer will sign him to a major
label and launch his career. He believes his song will rival Don
McLean's epic "American Pie"
It goes somthing like this:
"I'm the Goo, the goobally Goo.
The goobally,goobally,goobally Goo!"
"Everybody clap your hands!"
"I'm the Goo, the goobally Goo.
The goobally,goobally,goobally Goo!"
"Rock ON!!"
"I'm the Goo, the goobally Goo.
The goobally,goobally,goobally Goo!"
"Let's PAR-TAY!!"
"I'm the Goo, the goobally Goo.
The goobally,goobally,goobally Goo!"
Anyway it goes on like that for another 159 verses.
Goo even has a groupie named Baby Goo that follows him *everywhere*. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 31, 2007
Posts: 10
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:28 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Fuckwit David Harrison, who claims to appreciate the life of a dead
chicken, lied:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, the triumphant Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
> >Fuckwit David Harrison, who claims to appreciate the life of a dead chicken, lied:
> >:
> >> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, the triumphant Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
> >>> Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> >> Oh Rudy, I challenge you to explain why
> >> you think life has never been a benefit to anything without
> >> alluding to your obsession with a supposed "pre-existence"
> >> state.
YOU are the one who believes in "pre-existence", Fuckwit.
> >Already explained.
>
> LOL...no Rudy,
Yes, Fuckwit, it has. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 31, 2007
Posts: 10
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:29 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Fuckwit David Harrison, who claims to appreciate the life of a dead
chicken, lied:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:02:01 GMT, "Dutch" <n... DeleteThis @home.com> wrote:
> >Fuckwit David Harrison, who claims to appreciate the life of a dead chicken, lied:
> >> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, a triumphant Rudy Canoza wrote:
>
> >>>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> >> Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
> >> life has never been a benefit to anything, without
> >> referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>
> >If you didn't get it by now you never will.
>
> LOL!!!! Of course I "didn't get it by now" you poor
> fool, because
Because you choose to be stupid. Nice. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 03, 2005
Posts: 408
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:02:01 GMT, "Dutch" <not DeleteThis @home.com> wrote:
><dh@.> wrote in message news:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>>
>>>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>>
>> Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
>> life has never been a benefit to anything, without
>> referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>
>
>If you didn't get it by now you never will.
LOL!!!! Of course I "didn't get it by now" you poor
fool, because the Goober never could present it.
And of course I "never will" because the Goober
never will be able to present it. Goo has no clue, and
neither do you. If you think you do, then you either
present it for Goo or try to explain it yourself. But you
can't, and we know it. This is just another example
of you gooboys making absurd claims that you can't
back up, while hilariously claiming it has been done
in the past. Goo's and now your supposed "argument"
is completely dependant on people joining you in your
obsession with supposed "non-existent imaginary
livestock":
"Before being alive, an animal has no well-being to promote.
THEREFORE, Fuckwit, existence is not benefit to farm animals."
- Goo
I refused to join you in your idiocy. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 03, 2005
Posts: 408
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:17 -0700, ricky's babysitter <rudy-canoza DeleteThis @excite.com> wrote:
>On Jun 19, 2:02 pm, "Dutch" <n... DeleteThis @home.com> wrote:
>> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
>> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>>
>> >>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>>
>> > Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
>> > life has never been a benefit to anything, without
>> > referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>>
>> If you didn't get it by now you never will.
>
>
>Way to go Baby Goo!!!
>
>You tell him!
Yes, tell me Baby Goo. Tell me what you think the
Goober thinks he thinks he's trying to talking about,
if you think you have a clue. Hop to... >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 03, 2005
Posts: 408
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:59 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, a self beaten Goober desperately puled:
>dh challenged the lame one
>:
>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, a clueless Goober cluelessly claimed:
>>
>>> Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>>
>> Oh lamest of Goobers, I challenge you to explain why
>> you think life has never been a benefit to anything without
>> alluding to your obsession with a supposed "pre-existence"
>> state.
>Already explained.
LOL...no Goob, it has not. It may surprise you to learn that's
exactly why we can't find any examples of you ever doing it
Goo. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 20, 2007
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 5:01 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 20, 5:58 pm, "Dutch" <n... RemoveThis @home.com> wrote:
> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:oo1j73htq6gk5nm9ms3vv83clft3vrio90@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:17 -0700, ricky's babysitter
> > <rudy-can... RemoveThis @excite.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Jun 19, 2:02 pm, "Dutch" <n... RemoveThis @home.com> wrote:
> >>> <dh@.> wrote in
> >>> messagenews:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
> >>> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>
> >>> >>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>
> >>> > Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
> >>> > life has never been a benefit to anything, without
> >>> > referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>
> >>> If you didn't get it by now you never will.
>
> >>Way to go Baby Goo!!!
>
> >>You tell him!
>
> > Yes, tell me Baby Goo. Tell me what you think the
> > Goober thinks he thinks he's trying to talking about,
> > if you think you have a clue. Hop to...
>
> I'll talk to the wall, it'll be more responsive.
translation from Baby Goo's babble:
"The wall might believe what I say"
- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 108
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:57 pm
Post subject: Re: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
<dh@.> wrote in message news:sn1j73t5gdduf658iegn2oureql9j3aas2@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:02:01 GMT, "Dutch" <not.RemoveThis@home.com> wrote:
>
>><dh@.> wrote in message news:2c2g731sata5slu5m4h2u9e0pvrpqigul2@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, an inept Goober claimed:
>>>
>>>>Coming into existence is not a "gain" or "benefit".
>>>
>>> Goo, I challenge you to explain why you think
>>> life has never been a benefit to anything, without
>>> referring to your supposed "state of pre-existence".
>>
>>
>>If you didn't get it by now you never will.
>
> LOL!!!! Of course I "didn't get it by now"
I know, it's sad. >> Stay informed about: The illogic of Fuckwit David Harrison (ignorant cracker) |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
