Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights?

"Derek" <dereknash RemoveThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh2g6u$tg35n$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "rick etter" <retter RemoveThis @bright.net> wrote in message
news:RMUYa.8257$Ly2.1321762@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> >
> > > Rather than Ray's life being a sham, it is you who lives
> > > a lifestyle which is dependant on an addictive product
> > > which collaterally kills and harms many times more
> > > animals than his,
> > ====================
> > Again, the claim that cannot be proven.
>
> As your style guru, Jonathan Ball puts it;
====================
LOL I see you have nothing to say yourself anymore. What a hoot, resorting
to quoting Jonathan!! You really are too stupid to play.


> "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> feed for the animals you eat.
>
> The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
>
> You're doubly stupid, according to Jon, and you will
> always lose when comparing the death counts in each
> diet.
===============
Nope, you've already lost. You cannot even get into the game, killer. You
cannot even begin to prove the outragious claims you make!

Your best case is in GFB while mine is in glass
> covered crops, so your diet will always include death
> by default whereas mine does not. You lose, stupid.
====================
Nope. Because my diet is already fact. The 'glass-topped veggies is a pipe
dream, invented by vegans to try to salvage some shred of their delusions.
You still lose, dolt, because you, and Ray, do not come close to the fantasy
crop production that you try to cite as 'better'. Besides, if you had kept
up, unlikely for your minimun # of brain-cells after all your drug use,
you'd already know that I have siad that there is the possibility for a
vegan diet to cause less. You just don't eat it, and you are far too lazy
to even begin to live the lifestyle necessary to obtain it. You lose,
again, hypocrite. And yet again, you pal, Aristotle says so.


>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message
news:J%ZYa.8307$Ly2.1325461@cletus.bright.net...
>
> "Ray" <camcompany DeleteThis @ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:JpWYa.8202$yl6.5739@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> >
> > "rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message
> > news:wNUYa.8259$Ly2.1321780@cletus.bright.net...
> > >
> > > "extra service" <es DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
> > > news:3F34082D.1A5530D4@aol.com...
> > > > Just a no life troll.
> > > ==================
> > > ROTFLMAO And you've added what? Thought so...
> > >
> > >
> > > snips...
> > >
> > >
> > He added more than you sick lad. Obviously an astute guy - He had your
> > number.
> =[================
> LOL The irony of your post escapes you, doesn't it loser?

No.
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Ray" <camcompany.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh37i8$ruc$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
>
> "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> news:J%ZYa.8307$Ly2.1325461@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> > "Ray" <camcompany.DeleteThis@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:JpWYa.8202$yl6.5739@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> > >
> > > "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> > > news:wNUYa.8259$Ly2.1321780@cletus.bright.net...
> > > >
> > > > "extra service" <es.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:3F34082D.1A5530D4@aol.com...
> > > > > Just a no life troll.
> > > > ==================
> > > > ROTFLMAO And you've added what? Thought so...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > snips...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > He added more than you sick lad. Obviously an astute guy - He had your
> > > number.
> > =[================
> > LOL The irony of your post escapes you, doesn't it loser?
>
> No.
=-------------
yes it did. you're too stupid to se that. It's like all your other posts,
you don't say anything that means anything. You can't, you have nothing but
lys and delusions, like twitless.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"rick etter" <retter.TakeThisOut@bright.net> wrote in message news:Bd8Za.8331$Ly2.1330537@cletus.bright.net...
>
> "Derek" <dereknash.TakeThisOut@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:bh2g6u$tg35n$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "rick etter" <retter.TakeThisOut@bright.net> wrote in message
> news:RMUYa.8257$Ly2.1321762@cletus.bright.net...
> > >
> > >
> > > > Rather than Ray's life being a sham, it is you who lives
> > > > a lifestyle which is dependant on an addictive product
> > > > which collaterally kills and harms many times more
> > > > animals than his,
> > > ====================
> > > Again, the claim that cannot be proven.
> >
> > As your style guru, Jonathan Ball puts it;
> ====================
> LOL

Grow up, sonny.

> I see you have nothing to say yourself anymore.

Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
counting game against him?
>
> > "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> > lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> > have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> > grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> > eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> > deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> > CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> > feed for the animals you eat.
> >
> > The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> > meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> > the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> > hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> > Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
> >
> > You're doubly stupid, according to Jon, and you will
> > always lose when comparing the death counts in each
> > diet.
> ===============
> Nope, you've already lost.

So you say, but I've yet to see any proof of it. Why
don't you *try* defending your counting game
approach when Jonathan tells you you are doubly
stupid, Rick - too scared?

> You cannot even get into the game, killer.

I can, easily, and I'll beat you every time.

> You
> cannot even begin to prove the outragious claims you make!
>
I already did.

> >Your best case is in GFB while mine is in glass
> > covered crops, so your diet will always include death
> > by default whereas mine does not. You lose, stupid.
> ====================
> Nope.

Yep.

> Because my diet is already fact.

Prove it. I don't believe liars, so prove it.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh348c$tmgl8$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
news:Bd8Za.8331$Ly2.1330537@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> > "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:bh2g6u$tg35n$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > > "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> > news:RMUYa.8257$Ly2.1321762@cletus.bright.net...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Rather than Ray's life being a sham, it is you who lives
> > > > > a lifestyle which is dependant on an addictive product
> > > > > which collaterally kills and harms many times more
> > > > > animals than his,
> > > > ====================
> > > > Again, the claim that cannot be proven.
> > >
> > > As your style guru, Jonathan Ball puts it;
> > ====================
> > LOL
>
> Grow up, sonny.
=================
Ah, the wit of a brain dead loser... what a pity.

>
> > I see you have nothing to say yourself anymore.
>
> Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
> you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
> cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
> counting game against him?
======================
You are just too stupid to know what you are quoting. try reading the whole
statement you ignorant fool.


> >
> > > "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> > > lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> > > have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> > > grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> > > eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> > > deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> > > CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> > > feed for the animals you eat.
> > >
> > > The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> > > meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> > > the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> > > hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> > > Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
> > >
> > > You're doubly stupid, according to Jon, and you will
> > > always lose when comparing the death counts in each
> > > diet.
> > ===============
> > Nope, you've already lost.
>
> So you say, but I've yet to see any proof of it. Why
> don't you *try* defending your counting game
> approach when Jonathan tells you you are doubly
> stupid, Rick - too scared?
======================
Try reading your quote, you ignorant fool. It doesn't support your
ignorance and stupidity.

>
> > You cannot even get into the game, killer.
>
> I can, easily, and I'll beat you every time.
> ================
Not yet you haven't. You can't even read with comprehension what you keep
quoting. You really are that stupid, twit.


> > You
> > cannot even begin to prove the outragious claims you make!
> >
> I already did.
===============
ROTFLMAO Not in this lifetime, hypocrite. better try again.


>
> > >Your best case is in GFB while mine is in glass
> > > covered crops, so your diet will always include death
> > > by default whereas mine does not. You lose, stupid.
> > ====================
> > Nope.
>
> Yep.
> ======================
Prove it.


> > Because my diet is already fact.
>
> Prove it. I don't believe liars, so prove it.
====================
Prove what? That I eat meat? You really are too stupid!


>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

> > > > > > "rick etter" <retter.TakeThisOut@bright.net> wrote in message news:T7DYa.8204$Ly2.1313832@cletus.bright.net...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Again, I claim that my diet kills fewer animals than yours.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Prove it, Rick. Instead of just running your ignorant
> > > > > > mouth, provide evidence to support your claim.

Prove this claim, liar. I can't be bothered to waste my time
with aaev's simpleton, so be quick.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh393f$ud2s4$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > > > "rick etter" <retter.RemoveThis@bright.net> wrote in message
news:T7DYa.8204$Ly2.1313832@cletus.bright.net...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Again, I claim that my diet kills fewer animals than yours.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Prove it, Rick. Instead of just running your ignorant
> > > > > > > mouth, provide evidence to support your claim.
>
> Prove this claim, liar. I can't be bothered to waste my time
> with aaev's simpleton, so be quick.
=================
Already did. I kill one cow and get 100s of 1000s of calories that are part
of 100s of meals. just look at the overwhelming evedense that all your crop
production causes massive amounts of death and suffering. Look at it, don't
just snip it away because you don't like the truth, killer. The beef and
game i eat doesn't need any plowing, seeding, spraying, or harvesting with
large machines. Too bad all your food does, hypocrite. that just means
that *all* your food comes at the expense of animal death and suffering.
Now, why can't you even begin to support yopur claim that your deit causes
none/less?
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message news:JU8Za.8344$Ly2.1330657@cletus.bright.net...
>
> "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:bh348c$tmgl8$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
> > you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
> > cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
> > counting game against him?
> ======================
> You are just too stupid to know what you are quoting.

Jonathan says that;
"If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
feed for the animals you eat.

"The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22

Aren't you going to stand up to him and tell him he's
wrong, Rick, or are to much of a nebbish to even dare?
My guess is that you wouldn't know where to start.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh39dt$tq4ou$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message
news:JU8Za.8344$Ly2.1330657@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:bh348c$tmgl8$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > > Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
> > > you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
> > > cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
> > > counting game against him?
> > ======================
> > You are just too stupid to know what you are quoting.
>
> Jonathan says that;
> "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> feed for the animals you eat.
>
> "The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
>
> Aren't you going to stand up to him and tell him he's
> wrong, Rick, or are to much of a nebbish to even dare?
> My guess is that you wouldn't know where to start.
> ==================
No, because you aren't quoting anything that applies to the discussion we
are having you ignorant fool!
We aren't talking about grain fed beef, we are talking about the exception
he even states in the quote you keep trying to use. you really are too
stupid to play the game, killer. We are discussing game and home grown,
grass fed beef. man, you really are just too ignorant.


>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message news:DlaZa.8354$Ly2.1331039@cletus.bright.net...
>
> "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:bh393f$ud2s4$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > > > > "rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message
> news:T7DYa.8204$Ly2.1313832@cletus.bright.net...
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Again, I claim that my diet kills fewer animals than yours.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Prove it, Rick. Instead of just running your ignorant
> > > > > > > > mouth, provide evidence to support your claim.
> >
> > Prove this claim, liar. I can't be bothered to waste my time
> > with aaev's simpleton, so be quick.
> =================
> Already did. I kill one cow and get 100s of 1000s of calories that are part
> of 100s of meals. just look at the overwhelming evedense that all your crop
> production causes massive amounts of death and suffering.

Where?

> Look at it,

There isn't any.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh3fg3$tqgve$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "rick etter" <retter.RemoveThis@bright.net> wrote in message
news:DlaZa.8354$Ly2.1331039@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> > "Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:bh393f$ud2s4$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > > > > > > "rick etter" <retter.RemoveThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> > news:T7DYa.8204$Ly2.1313832@cletus.bright.net...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Again, I claim that my diet kills fewer animals than
yours.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Prove it, Rick. Instead of just running your ignorant
> > > > > > > > > mouth, provide evidence to support your claim.
> > >
> > > Prove this claim, liar. I can't be bothered to waste my time
> > > with aaev's simpleton, so be quick.
> > =================
> > Already did. I kill one cow and get 100s of 1000s of calories that are
part
> > of 100s of meals. just look at the overwhelming evedense that all your
crop
> > production causes massive amounts of death and suffering.
>
> Where?
===============
what you keep ignoring by snipping out, fruit cake.


>
> > Look at it,
>
> There isn't any.
==============
there's lots of it. you just don't like it because you are complicit. even
your pal Aristotle has told you that.

>
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message news:ooaZa.8355$Ly2.1331067@cletus.bright.net...
>
> "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:bh39dt$tq4ou$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "rick etter" <retter DeleteThis @bright.net> wrote in message
> news:JU8Za.8344$Ly2.1330657@cletus.bright.net...
> > >
> > > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > > news:bh348c$tmgl8$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > >
> > > > Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
> > > > you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
> > > > cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
> > > > counting game against him?
> > > ======================
> > > You are just too stupid to know what you are quoting.
> >
> > Jonathan says that;
> > "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> > lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> > have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> > grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> > eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> > deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> > CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> > feed for the animals you eat.
> >
> > "The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> > meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> > the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> > hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> > Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
> >
> > Aren't you going to stand up to him and tell him he's
> > wrong, Rick, or are to much of a nebbish to even dare?
> > My guess is that you wouldn't know where to start.
> > ==================
> No

I thought so, coward.
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights? 

"Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bh3fht$uhffm$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
news:ooaZa.8355$Ly2.1331067@cletus.bright.net...
> >
> > "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:bh39dt$tq4ou$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > > "rick etter" <retter.DeleteThis@bright.net> wrote in message
> > news:JU8Za.8344$Ly2.1330657@cletus.bright.net...
> > > >
> > > > "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:bh348c$tmgl8$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you disagree with Jonathan when he says
> > > > > you are doubly stupid, Rick, or are you too
> > > > > cowardly to take him on and defend your weak
> > > > > counting game against him?
> > > > ======================
> > > > You are just too stupid to know what you are quoting.
> > >
> > > Jonathan says that;
> > > "If you insist on playing a stupid countig game, you'll
> > > lose. "vegans" and a few sensible meat eaters alike
> > > have pointed out that the overwhelming majority of
> > > grain is grown to feed livestock. That means if you
> > > eat meat that you bought at a store, you cause more
> > > deaths: the deaths of the animals you eat, plus the
> > > CDs of the animals killed in the course of producing
> > > feed for the animals you eat.
> > >
> > > "The counting game is doubly stupid to be offered by
> > > meat eaters: the moral issue isn't about counting, and
> > > the meat eater will always lose the game, unless he
> > > hunts or raises and slaughters his own meat."
> > > Jonathan Ball Date: 2003-05-22
> > >
> > > Aren't you going to stand up to him and tell him he's
> > > wrong, Rick, or are to much of a nebbish to even dare?
> > > My guess is that you wouldn't know where to start.
> > > ==================
> > No
>
> I thought so, coward.
==================
Why the cowardly snip of my answer killer? Without annotation, I might
add. Still the sleazy liar you've always been, eh hypocrite?
"...No, because you aren't quoting anything that applies to the discussion
we
are having you ignorant fool!..."

As I said, his post has nothing to do, except that it agrees with my
assertions, with our discussion at hand. Since you don't have anything to
prove your claims, and keep snipping what I provide for you, just means you
are getting very desperate. Especially since you have to quote Jonathan as
your sources! What a hoot!!



>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Why are ARA's so concerned with animal rights?