No farmer gives a f..k about his animals

"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy RemoveThis @ph.con> wrote in message
news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
> "getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
> give the very best care to their animals.
>
> No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
> experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
> They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
> reason.

Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
care of.

--
"If you're not a liberal by the time you're 20, you have no heart;
If you aren't a conservative by the time you're 40, you have no
brain."

- Winston Churchill
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:35:48 -0400, "Napalm Heart" <*nospam*@iserv.net>
wrote:

>
>"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.DeleteThis@ph.con> wrote in message
>news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>> "getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>> give the very best care to their animals.
>>
>> No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>> experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>> They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>> reason.
>
>Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
>care of.


Ayup. Long is the time I've seen farmers looking for cattle who got
out during a snowstrom, risking life to save some animal and this is a
*common* occurance.

Then, there's the staying up all night, working a new born calf, ewe
or whatever in addition to working a 12 hour (Or longer) day.

Uh-huh, they sure don't care at all...Suuurrreeeeeee
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

Michael wrote:
> "Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.DeleteThis@ph.con> wrote in message
> news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>
>>"getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>>give the very best care to their animals.
>>
>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>reason.
>
>
> Wrong slick.
>
> I raise animals for the dinner table so I know how they were raised.
>
> PS learned all about foie gras from the PETA website. They probably didn't
> intend that to happen did they.

The post to which you replied is a forgery by Fuckwit
David Harrison.

No farmers raise livestock because they think it's a
good thing for livestock animals to "get to experience
life". They raise livestock animals either for money,
or to consume the animals themselves. They don't place
any value on the animals' "getting to experience life".
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

Napalm Heart wrote:

> "Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.RemoveThis@ph.con> wrote in message
> news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>
>>"getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>>give the very best care to their animals.
>>
>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>reason.
>
>
> Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
> care of.

Not all of them, but that isn't the point of the forged
post from Fuckwit.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

Gene wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:35:48 -0400, "Napalm Heart" <*nospam*@iserv.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.RemoveThis@ph.con> wrote in message
>>news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>>
>>>"getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>>>give the very best care to their animals.
>>>
>>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>>reason.
>>
>>Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
>>care of.
>
>
>
> Ayup. Long is the time I've seen farmers looking for cattle who got
> out during a snowstrom, risking life to save some animal and this is a
> *common* occurance.

Not in dispute. But they don't raise animals in the
first place out of some sense that the animals'
"getting to experience life" is a good thing. Fuckwit
claims that's part of why they do it, and he's wrong.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

Rudy Canoza < wrote:

> "getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
> give the very best care to their animals.
>
> No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
> experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
> They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
> reason.

Fuckwit: Stop forging posts, or I'm going to get your
BellSouth account canceled.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 04:03:25 GMT, Rudy Canoza <someguy DeleteThis @ph.con> wrote:

>Gene wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 19:35:48 -0400, "Napalm Heart" <*nospam*@iserv.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy DeleteThis @ph.con> wrote in message
>>>news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>"getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>>>>give the very best care to their animals.
>>>>
>>>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>>>reason.
>>>
>>>Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
>>>care of.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ayup. Long is the time I've seen farmers looking for cattle who got
>> out during a snowstrom, risking life to save some animal and this is a
>> *common* occurance.
>
>Not in dispute. But they don't raise animals in the
>first place out of some sense that the animals'
>"getting to experience life" is a good thing. Fuckwit
>claims that's part of why they do it, and he's wrong.


a good farmer, is like a great fisherman.

"Never feel sorry for the bait" is their motto. The famer loves the
land, the job and the life (If it's all going good) as much or more as
anyone happy in their job, but actual concern for the animals
"Experience" usually doesn't even cross their minds.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.TakeThisOut@ph.con> wrote in message
news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
> "getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
> give the very best care to their animals.
>
> No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
> experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
> They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
> reason.
not even a 1 on my trollometer,
and what did your mom have planned for you :)
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

The Bald Ass Prairie Farm <rosielle@telus wrote:

> "Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.TakeThisOut@ph.con> wrote in message
> news:q0hd51ddvbjinrr7j5ul0np1aq52i8ij3d@4ax.com...
>
>>"getting to experience life". That includes the ones who
>>give the very best care to their animals.
>>
>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>reason.
>
> not even a 1 on my trollometer,

Fuckwit David Harrison, who usually posts using 'dh@.'
or 'dh_ld@nomail.com', wrote the troll post and forged
my named to it. He's an idiot and a liar.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

"Gene" <Gene DeleteThis @nowhere.com> wrote in message
> "Napalm Heart" <*nospam*@iserv.net> wrote:
> >"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy DeleteThis @ph.con> wrote in message

> >> No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
> >> experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
> >> They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
> >> reason.
> >
> >Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
> >care of.
>
>
> Ayup. Long is the time I've seen farmers looking for cattle who got
> out during a snowstrom, risking life to save some animal and this is a
> *common* occurance.
>
> Then, there's the staying up all night, working a new born calf, ewe
> or whatever in addition to working a 12 hour (Or longer) day.
>
> Uh-huh, they sure don't care at all...Suuurrreeeeeee

LOL.

You are being mean! People who don't like animals and do not live closely
to them can never understand this concept of "care" and won't even know what
you are writing about. :-))
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

Farm1 wrote:

> "Gene" <Gene.DeleteThis@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
>>"Napalm Heart" <*nospam*@iserv.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"Rudy Canoza >" <<dumbguy.DeleteThis@ph.con> wrote in message
>
>
>>>>No farmers consider that the animals' "getting to
>>>>experience life" is worth even a moment's consideration.
>>>>They raise animals to make money, and that's the only
>>>>reason.
>>>
>>>Since they are a financial asset to farmers, livestock are well-taken
>>>care of.
>>
>>
>>Ayup. Long is the time I've seen farmers looking for cattle who got
>>out during a snowstrom, risking life to save some animal and this is a
>>*common* occurance.
>>
>> Then, there's the staying up all night, working a new born calf, ewe
>>or whatever in addition to working a 12 hour (Or longer) day.
>>
>> Uh-huh, they sure don't care at all...Suuurrreeeeeee
>
>
> LOL.
>
> You are being mean! People who don't like animals and do not live closely
> to them can never understand this concept of "care" and won't even know what
> you are writing about.

The idea of farmers caring for their animals isn't hard
to grasp. I have no doubt they do. They do NOT,
however, breed and raise livestock because they think
the animals "benefit" by coming into existence. They
breed and raise livestock in order to make money, or to
consume the animals themselves.

Fuckwit David Harrison, the asswipe who forged the
original post in this thread, has been pissing away his
time for the last six years trying to beat up on
"vegans" for wanting to cause the extinction of farm
animals. Fuckwit thinks that what's wrong with
"veganism" and "animal rights" is that it will prevent
livestock from receiving the "benefit" of "getting to
experience life". That is not what's wrong with
"veganism", and is an irrational basis for opposing
"animal rights". There is plenty of good reason for
opposing "ar", but the trivial fact that livestock
animals would not "get to experience life" is not one
of them.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

"Scented Nectar" <me.TakeThisOut@scentednectar.com> wrote in message
news:DsednZUBJrfCk8XfRVn-sw@rogers.com...
> "Jim Webster" <Jim.TakeThisOut@zerospam.mok.net> wrote in message

> I don't trust humans when it
> comes to eating wild meats.
> We have a bad track record
> of pushing species to
> endangerment or outright
> extinctions. Like with the
> buffalo and cod.
>
humans are the ones who live in urban filth and then complain about how
their food is produced

Jim Webster
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals 

On 9 Apr 2005 16:17:40 -0700, gene RemoveThis @pad39a.com wrote:

>I grew up with Judy. She was the friendliest cow who would follow us
>around. We fed her well and she was happy to come home from roaming the
>pasture each morning and evening to be milked. We would have been
>negligant to let her get through the fence and get hit by some speeding
>city dweller that didn't have the sense to watch out for farm animals.


Of course, this also shows the animals have no "Proper" sense in
avoiding hazzards.
 >> Stay informed about: No farmer gives a f..k about his animals