Fuckwit has written,
Unless you can show how something that is not
alive can benefit...
That's the whole point: something that is not alive
CANNOT benefit, from ANYTHING. As an animal is not
alive prior to "gaining life" - DUHHHHHHHHHHH! -
therefore "gaining life" CANNOT be a benefit. QED
Because existence per se is not a benefit, no one who
wants to prevent farm animals from existing is
withholding any kind of "benefit" from "them". (Big
hint, Fuckwit: until the animals exist, there is no
"them" from whom a "benefit" might be withheld.)
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
