 |
|
|
|
Next: VIVISECTION -Any Use?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:14 pm
Post subject: WankHar's ethical incoherence
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
WankHar doesn't want to be known as a "vegan", and in
fact churlishly denies that he is one. However, he
eschews animal products for the *same* reason as
self-described "vegans". Obviously, he doesn't eschew
*all* the animal products that "vegans" do - he must
chew some, not eschew - but he can't or won't say why
he draws the line differently from self-described
"vegans". He says he has explained it, but he is lying.
WankHar is a "vegan" in all but self-description. To
the extent he is one, he is just as morally incoherent
as they are. To the extent he isn't, he is even more
incoherent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 30, 2003
Posts: 148
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 8:43 pm
Post subject: Re: WankHar's ethical incoherence [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 131
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2003 11:41 pm
Post subject: Re: WankHar's ethical incoherence [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Zakhar" <nospam.RemoveThis@donotuse123.com> wrote in message
news:srgTa.51087$xd5.2930364@stones.force9.net...
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote an incoherent message.
>
>
So what's new? >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 23, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Jonathan's unethical Zakhar [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:g2gTa.115035$Io.9818524@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> WankHar doesn't want to be known as a "vegan",
......
> WankHar is a "vegan" in all but self-description.
And that's where you come in and describe him
for us. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Jonathan's unethical Zakhar [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
firstoftwins wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:g2gTa.115035$Io.9818524@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
>>WankHar doesn't want to be known as a "vegan",
>
> .....
>
>>WankHar is a "vegan" in all but self-description.
>
>
> And that's where you come in and describe him
> for us.
Yes: his description includes 'morally incoherent'. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Jonathan's unethical Zakhar [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Jonathan Ball wrote:
> firstoftwins wrote:
>
>> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
>> news:g2gTa.115035$Io.9818524@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>>
>>> WankHar doesn't want to be known as a "vegan",
>>
>>
>> .....
>>
>>> WankHar is a "vegan" in all but self-description.
>>
>>
>>
>> And that's where you come in and describe him
>> for us.
>
>
> Yes: his description includes 'morally incoherent'.
So does yours, but yours also includes 'deliberate
liar'. Come to think of it, so does his. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 23, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 3:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Jonathan's unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:zLwTa.116188$Io.9918699@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> firstoftwins wrote:
>
> > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:g2gTa.115035$Io.9818524@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >
> >>WankHar doesn't want to be known as a "vegan",
> > .....
> >
> >>WankHar is a "vegan" in all but self-description.
> >
> > And that's where you come in and describe him
> > for us.
>
> Yes: his description includes 'morally incoherent'.
>
According to you, all vegetarians and vegans are
unethical and morally incoherent, and you describe
them that way to more easily misrepresent them. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 5:27 am
Post subject: Re: Dreck is unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 23, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 7:25 am
Post subject: Re: Dreck is unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:hXxTa.116255$Io.9925810@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
> That was just a couple days more than one year ago.
>
"A couple 'of' days more..." not what you wrote, berk. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 2:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Dreck is MORE unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
firstoftwins wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:hXxTa.116255$Io.9925810@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
>>That was just a couple days more than one year ago.
>>
>
> "A couple 'of' days more..." not what you wrote, berk.
Shitwipe, you posted this one as 'firstofshitbags'
almost HALF AN HOUR (28 minutes) after posting your
shitty feeble excuse under the 'Dreck' pseudonym.
Looks as if you "accidentally" fired your shotgun into
the crowd again... You *really* are trying to get into
Feltham for a little rumpy-pumpy, aren't you? >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 29, 2003
Posts: 24
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 3:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Dreck is unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
news:J6KTa.19229$Mc.1474353@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> Fuck off, Dump, you pathetic drunk.
>
Not good enough ~~Jonnie~~. Calling me 'a drunk' does not explain the fact
that you post under several names. You will get kicked out of hell for your
lies. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 4:08 pm
Post subject: Re: Dreck is unethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Ray wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
> news:J6KTa.19229$Mc.1474353@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
>>Fuck off, Dump, you pathetic drunk.
>>
>
> Not good enough ~~Jonnie~~.
Plenty good enough, Dump. Fuck off, you slurring
sloppy drunk. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 23, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 4:17 pm
Post subject: Re: first is always MORE ethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:mpSTa.117815$Io.10051576@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> firstoftwins wrote:
>
> > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:hXxTa.116255$Io.9925810@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >
> >>That was just a couple days more than one year ago.
> >>
> >
> > "A couple 'of' days more..." not what you wrote, berk.
>
> Shitwipe, you posted this one as 'firstofshitbags'
> almost HALF AN HOUR (28 minutes) after posting your
> shitty feeble excuse under the 'Dreck' pseudonym.
>
No, I didn't.
> Looks as if you "accidentally" fired your shotgun into
> the crowd again...
There's no such a thing as an accident, though that
isn't an admission for anything you're assumimg I've
supposed to have done intentionally.
> You *really* are trying to get into
> Feltham for a little rumpy-pumpy, aren't you?
> >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 4:17 pm
Post subject: Re: first is always MORE ethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
firstoftwins wrote:
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:mpSTa.117815$Io.10051576@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
>>firstoftwins wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:hXxTa.116255$Io.9925810@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>That was just a couple days more than one year ago.
>>>>
>>>
>>>"A couple 'of' days more..." not what you wrote, berk.
>>
>>Shitwipe, you posted this one as 'firstofshitbags'
>>almost HALF AN HOUR (28 minutes) after posting your
>>shitty feeble excuse under the 'Dreck' pseudonym.
>>
>
> No, I didn't.
Yes, you did. Your feeble shitty excuse, which you
posted as "Dreck", was posted at 10:57PM Pacific
Daylight Time on 23 July. The post in which you
erroneously criticized me for my use of "couple [of]
days" was posted as "firstofshitbags", and it posted at
11:25PM PDT on 23 July.
You're unethically switching back and forth, shitbag,
just as you are now.
You get the last word on it, shitbag. I have better
things to do.
>
>
>>Looks as if you "accidentally" fired your shotgun into
>>the crowd again...
>
>
> There's no such a thing as an accident,
Yes, there is, although that wouldn't be one, which is
why I put it in quotation marks.
> though that
> isn't an admission for anything you're assumimg I've
> supposed to have done intentionally.
>
>
>>You *really* are trying to get into
>>Feltham for a little rumpy-pumpy, aren't you?
Your visible Kaposi's sarcoma ought to keep you safe,
unless they're lifers. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 23, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2003 9:12 pm
Post subject: Re: first is always MORE ethical [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:KgTTa.117875$Io.10055729@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> firstoftwins wrote:
> >
> > There's no such a thing as an accident,
>
> Yes, there is
No, there isn't. >> Stay informed about: WankHar's ethical incoherence |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting.. - Dear Supporter: The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting Bill has been announced for 30th June. This is a critical vote for the future of hunting with dogs. The Government's Hunting Bill, bans deer hunting, hare coursing and hare..
Virus Warning - I don't know why I bother, I suppose I'm just that kinda guy. There's a W32 Gibe.B@MM waiting for:- ~~Jonnie~~ Rick Etter Dr. Doody I have receive a couple for the same source KenHedges@insightbb.com , never heard of the guy. It's the usual Microsoft..
"We Have Tried Nipping Her In The Ear Or Back Leg As Mom W.. - HOWEDY sinofabitch, "Sionnach" <rhyfelwr@msn.com> wrote in message news:au22pc$3qfo7$1@ID-45033.news.dfncis.de... > <flabeare@ec.rr.com> wrote: in message > news:6DUM9.39937$Rt1.2190245@twister.southeast.rr.com... > >...
Pushy Stinkers - N.I.L.I.F. - Re: Help with Cane Corso - HOWEDY leah, "Leah" <dfrntdrums@aol.comMURK-OFF> wrote in message news:20021221213053.23518.00000267@mb-mg.aol.com... > >flabeare@ec.rr.com wrote: > >Being a trainer we are going to get bit. Only if you're a screw up, leah....
Bitchup's son's drunk driving case - Bitchup, how did this come out? Was he convicted? Is he out picking up trash on Interstates 71 and/or 675, or maybe U.S. 35? Does his tendency to get into trouble come from your side of the family, or poor Richard's? How many times did your dad.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
