Strange!

degeneRat wrote:
<...>
> *LOL* jonnie's stored up a backlog of well-deserved abuse that could
> last a long lifetime.

Let's hope he still has a long lifetime. What have you and your child molesting
goons done with him, Karen?
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

"usual suspect" <support.RemoveThis@our.troops> wrote in message
news:4jYfc.14217$Wf5.5124@fe1.texas.rr.com...
> degeneRat wrote:
> <...>
> > *LOL* jonnie's stored up a backlog of well-deserved abuse that could
> > last a long lifetime.
>
> Let's hope he still has a long lifetime. What have you and your child
molesting
> goons done with him, Karen?

I'd like to know the same thing. Giving away his info to those loons was
absolutely despicable.

-Rubystars
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:28:19 GMT, "Rubystars" <windstorm DeleteThis @swbell.net> wrote:

>I never had many arguments with Ball. I didn't agree with some of his
>tactics (Calling women some of the names he did was way over the line, IMO)
>but that's beside the point. If his "rotting corpse" is found, the guilt
>should be on yours and Sylvia's part, no one else's. Quit trying to shift
>the blame to all these other people. Did Rick, Usual, or I give away his
>info to a bunch of pedophiles and other assorted sick bastards? No, that's
>all you two. I said both of you should mind your own business, and you
>failed to do that.
>
>I was on your side to the point that I didn't think he had any place to be
>informing your son of things that happened online in a "fun" forum, but now
>that you've done this, I hope that Ball is still ok, and that he does tell
>your son, everything, including this latest B.S.

Way to do it, Rube! Didn't think you had it in you. ;-)

><snip>
>
>-Rubystars
>
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

ipse dixit <f.TakeThisOut@chance.com> wrote in message news:<vvp480t0qu41ktppnlilt8dme41p1ug0qs.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>...
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 04:28:19 GMT, "Rubystars" <windstorm.TakeThisOut@swbell.net> wrote:
>
> >I never had many arguments with Ball. I didn't agree with some of his
> >tactics (Calling women some of the names he did was way over the line, IMO)
> >but that's beside the point. If his "rotting corpse" is found, the guilt
> >should be on yours and Sylvia's part, no one else's. Quit trying to shift
> >the blame to all these other people. Did Rick, Usual, or I give away his
> >info to a bunch of pedophiles and other assorted sick bastards? No, that's
> >all you two. I said both of you should mind your own business, and you
> >failed to do that.
> >
> >I was on your side to the point that I didn't think he had any place to be
> >informing your son of things that happened online in a "fun" forum, but now
> >that you've done this, I hope that Ball is still ok, and that he does tell
> >your son, everything, including this latest B.S.
>


> Way to do it, Rube! Didn't think you had it in you. ;-)



She's losin' it just like Ball used to when he'd get excited. She
replied to *my* post.








>
> ><snip>
> >
> >-Rubystars
> >
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

usual suspect wrote:
>
> frlpwr wrote:
>
(snip)

> > Remember when you tried to
> > convince me that a man couldn't be married AND a women-hater?
>
> Not as you represent it. I remember something where you were claiming > that Jon is a dangerous misogynist because he calls you a cunt and
> suggests you smell like a "wrecked fishing trawler full of distempered > tuna." I don't think you ever proved that he's a misogynist on those > grounds.
>
You're having a bout of selective memeory loss. My claim was that Jon's
well documented use of female genitalia as a slur belies a misogynist
bent. Your defense of him relied solely on his marital status. If I
recall correctly, you said emphatically, "But he's a married man...", as
if marriage precluded a hatred and distaste for women.

I hope you have, by now, realized how ridiculous that is.
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

frlpwr <frlpwr RemoveThis @flash.net> wrote in message news:<408B081E.F66 RemoveThis @flash.net>...
> usual suspect wrote:
> >
> > frlpwr wrote:
> >
> (snip)
>
> > > Remember when you tried to
> > > convince me that a man couldn't be married AND a women-hater?
> >
> > Not as you represent it. I remember something where you were claiming > that Jon is a dangerous misogynist because he calls you a cunt and
> > suggests you smell like a "wrecked fishing trawler full of distempered > tuna." I don't think you ever proved that he's a misogynist on those > grounds.
> >
> You're having a bout of selective memeory loss. My claim was that Jon's
> well documented use of female genitalia as a slur belies a misogynist
> bent. Your defense of him relied solely on his marital status. If I
> recall correctly, you said emphatically, "But he's a married man...", as
> if marriage precluded a hatred and distaste for women.
>
> I hope you have, by now, realized how ridiculous that is.



Useless usually can't realize something unless it's been shoved up his
ass and broken off and shoved in again.

Then he becomes dimly aware.......
 >> Stay informed about: Strange! 

frlpwr wrote:
<...>
> You're having a bout of selective memeory loss.

No memory loss at all.

> My claim was that Jon's
> well documented use of female genitalia as a slur belies a misogynist
> bent.

Just as I noted.

> Your defense of him relied solely on his marital status. If I
> recall correctly, you said emphatically, "But he's a married man...", as
> if marriage precluded a hatred and distaste for women.

That was not the basis of my defense. I merely pointed out that your theory
seems to be contradicted by details like the status of his marriage. He's only
written colorful things about specific women, not about all women. Your
defensiveness about your gynecological health is noted, though. Hehe.

> I hope you have, by now, realized how ridiculous that is.

I do realize how ridiculous you are.
 >> Stay informed about: Strange!