Stop running away from it, Karen

You have several times expressed the fervent hope that
your grandson grow up to be homosexual. You claim,
unpersuasively, that it's so you might have a better
relationship with him, presumably than you imagine you
would have if he were normal.

That's a lie. The reason is, you know your son will
consider that a terrible result. You want your
grandson to be homosexual only as a vile, small-minded,
vengeful way of "getting back" at your son. That's
obvious to everyone.

You pretend that your son is solely responsible for the
poisoned relationship between the two of you.
Bullshit. If readers knew only of your filthy hope
that your grandson be homosexual, they'd know enough to
see that you bear huge fault for the shitty
relationship you have with your son. Of course, they
know much more than that: they know that you abandoned
your son repeatedly and in multiple ways when he was a
very small boy. Your moral and emotional abandonment
of him date from the very beginning.

When are you going to address this topic, Karen?
You've brought it up, voluntarily; you have no privacy
interest in it. Why can't you admit that you are
afraid of your son's reaction if he were to learn of
your hope for his son?

"Jonathan Ball" <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote in message
<snip>
> When are you going to address this topic, Karen?
> You've brought it up, voluntarily; you have no privacy
> interest in it. Why can't you admit that you are
> afraid of your son's reaction if he were to learn of
> your hope for his son?

I wonder if she really wants that or if she really did mean that
she wants to have a better relationship with him than she did with
his dad.

It doesn't matter what caused the rift between her and her son
as to whether she has a good relationship with her grandson,
since they're two different people.

I don't think it's very kind to wish homosexuality on anyone though,
since it is a marginalizing thing and not easy on the people who have it.]
Rat should know that since she says that she's part of an oppressed group
that is fighting for equal rights.

Then again I don't think it's very relevant to the issues of this newsgroup
to
drag Rat's personal life all over Usenet. None of us have to agree or
approve of what she does in her own family. I'm surprised that anyone
really cares what she does.

Is this just a way of avoiding discussing her points as regarding animal
rights,
or did she bring up all this family stuff?

I haven't been around long enough to know the background of all this.

-Rubystars