Melanie L Chang wrote:
> Robin Nuttall (robinjn@mchsi.com) wrote:
>
> The only muttering comments I've ever heard that I thought were fair were
> about dogs that were way too overweight to be safely doing agility.
Oh my muttering about that gets pretty darn loud. I can't stand it.
Stacy Peardot-Goudy calls agility the Iron Man competition for dogs.
It's incredibly physically demanding. Asking that dog to heave even an
extra pound over those jumps is just stupid, because it will shorten his
career. At most trials, we don't see many fat dogs beyond Novice. But in
Des Moines a few weeks ago there were a whole load of them--I've never
seen so many fat dogs at a trial!
>
> : We have our fair share of dogs with issues in the club--I'm sure every
> : training facility does.
>
> A lot of them are becoming less welcoming, for liability reasons and
> because of general paranoia/indignation on the part of owners of "normal"
> dogs who don't want their dogs exposed to those other types of dogs.
> Luckily, the club I train at isn't like that.
Our policy is that dogs with aggression problems, canine or human, must
be addressed. If the human is really on top of things, understands the
issues, and actively works to address them--they're welcome. If the
owner is in denial or doesn't want to or have the skills to address the
issue, choosing to not address it, they're not welcome. We banned a SCWT
from our classes for awhile for dog aggression. His owner, a soft-spoken
mild-mannered woman, decided she better deal with her dog. She did, he's
back, and is now quite capable of running off lead in a class with other
dogs standing around.
So uncontrolled aggression of any sort isn't welcome. Controlled dogs are.
>> Stay informed about: Solo's big day