Pete goes back to being a man again.

FAQ

Profile

Pete goes back to being a man again.
Goto page 1, 2

Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights

Related Topics:

Pete launches verbal attack on 42-yr-old schizophrenic man. - Malcolm reported the Robert Scott, 42, who has been diagnosed as suffering has been in a pilot scheme for the walks for six weeks. He has already benefits, saying: "It has been a for..

Animals strike back again! - Sea Lion Grabs Fisherman Off Boat Fri Mar 12, 8:38 AM ET AP Alaska - A fisherman is from an encounter with a sea lion that leaped out of the water, grabbed him as he worked on his docked boat and..

Idiots with dog in back of pickup - I live in a rural area, and there is a local who drives around with a large dog in the back of his open pickup truck box. The dog is always jumping around to see what is going on. I have seen this idiot with his dog numerous times, and have..

BRING BACK THE BISON???? I WISH YOU BAD LUCK! - I once brought back the Bi'Son now I wish him all bad luck, for I'm a peaceful bird that the Bi'Son would like to pluck. Faustafel flaunts around in womens clothes and says its all in fun, but now God has him figured out and soon he will be shunned! ..

"We Have Tried Nipping Her In The Ear Or Back Leg As Mom W.. - HOWEDY wrote in message > wrote: in message > > > (Not breeds, I don't..

Next: new foto in my side

Author

Message

Philip Hart

External

Since: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: 4

(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:58 pm
Post subject: Pete goes back to being a man again.
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)

Your favourite headcase has gone back to using male names again. He's
decided to be Colin for a while. Watch this space for further developments.

>> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Mark

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 2

(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 1:31 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

amacmil... DeleteThis @aol.com wrote (yet again): > Who's Pete? To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this simple (as I know you like very simple things)... Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed out many times, but it's always Pete. Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete. The rest of us are normal... TTFN Mark >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

John Rampling

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 1

(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 8:51 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mark" <mark_etheridge.DeleteThis@volcanomail.com> wrote in message news:1158481891.568143.53560@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > amacmil....DeleteThis@aol.com wrote (yet again): > >> Who's Pete? > > To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this > simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > > Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever > agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed > out many times, but it's always Pete. > > Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete.... Yes, that's right.. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

amacmil304

External

Since: Feb 20, 2005
Posts: 46

(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:17 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:58:03 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphart.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote: >Your favourite headcase has gone back to using male names again. He's >decided to be Colin for a while. Watch this space for further developments. > > Who's Pete? Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

amacmil304

External

Since: Feb 20, 2005
Posts: 46

(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 17 Sep 2006 01:31:31 -0700, "Mark" <mark_etheridge.DeleteThis@volcanomail.com> wrote: >amacmil...@aol.com wrote (yet again): > >> Who's Pete? > >To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this >simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > >Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever >agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed >out many times, but it's always Pete. But who is Pete? > >Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete. The rest of >us are normal... > >TTFN >Mark What's normal? Angus Macmillan www.roots-of-blood.org.uk www.killhunting.org www.con-servation.org.uk All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident. -- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Geoff

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32

(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:39 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:51:43 GMT, "John Rampling" <John RemoveThis @NOSPAM.com> wrote: > >"Mark" <mark_etheridge RemoveThis @volcanomail.com> wrote in message >news:1158481891.568143.53560@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >> amacmil... RemoveThis @aol.com wrote (yet again): >> >>> Who's Pete? >> >> To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this >> simple (as I know you like very simple things)... >> >> Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever >> agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed >> out many times, but it's always Pete. >> >> Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete.... > > >Yes, that's right.. > Hello Pete. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Geoff

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32

(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:57 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:10 +0100, amacmil304 DeleteThis @aol.com wrote: >On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:58:03 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphart DeleteThis @aol.com> >wrote: > >>Your favourite headcase has gone back to using male names again. He's >>decided to be Colin for a while. Watch this space for further developments. >> >> > >Who's Pete? > A real stud by all accounts ;]] >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Hirundo

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 2

(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Geoff" <g23434ssd.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:tu6qg2df2ak3n2ial9l9j0alui9vpba7p3@4ax.com... > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:10 +0100, amacmil304.DeleteThis@aol.com wrote: > >>On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:58:03 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphart.DeleteThis@aol.com> >>wrote: >> >>>Your favourite headcase has gone back to using male names again. He's >>>decided to be Colin for a while. Watch this space for further >>>developments. >>> >>> >> >>Who's Pete? >> > > A real stud by all accounts ;]] I thought we were told not to use Pete and make our own compost :-)) -- P >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Geoff

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32

(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 6:45 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:23:24 +0100, "Hirundo" <peter.swallow.RemoveThis@care4free.net> wrote: > >"Geoff" <g23434ssd.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:tu6qg2df2ak3n2ial9l9j0alui9vpba7p3@4ax.com... >> On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:10 +0100, amacmil304.RemoveThis@aol.com wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:58:03 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphart.RemoveThis@aol.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>>>Your favourite headcase has gone back to using male names again. He's >>>>decided to be Colin for a while. Watch this space for further >>>>developments. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>Who's Pete? >>> >> >> A real stud by all accounts ;]] > >I thought we were told not to use Pete and make our own compost :-)) Pete would be good for the garden. He attracts all the slugs from Usenet. Some from holes we have never heard of. They crawl in here in their stomachs. Spread their poison and crawl off again. He must have really kicked some backside in his day. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Philip Hart

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 3

(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:32 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Mark" <mark_etheridge DeleteThis @volcanomail.com> writes: 1158481891.568143.53560 DeleteThis @h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > amacmil... DeleteThis @aol.com wrote (yet again): > > > Who's Pete? > > To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this > simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > > Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever > agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed > out many times, but it's always Pete. > > Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete. The rest of > us are normal... Very useful post, Mark. Allows anyone who's watching to identify another new pseudonym by the troll Pete, who by all accounts likes sneaking into his mother's bedroom and trying her panties on for size. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Philip Hart

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 3

(Msg. 11) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"John Rampling" <John.RemoveThis@NOSPAM.com> writes: z08Pg.4584$2g5.559@newsfe7-win.ntli.net... > > "Mark" <mark_etheridge.RemoveThis@volcanomail.com> wrote in message > news:1158481891.568143.53560@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > > amacmil....RemoveThis@aol.com wrote (yet again): > > > >> Who's Pete? > > > > To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this > > simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > > > > Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever > > agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed > > out many times, but it's always Pete. > > > > Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete.... > Yes, that's right.. Very droll. And you even made Pete smile too (see your other reply) I've just seen a Pete classic, wherein he posts as ©¿© , then replies to himself as Ian and then as Geoff. Definitely well worth a Bwahahaha..... >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Geoff

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32

(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:12 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:32:17 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphatr RemoveThis @aoI.con> wrote: > >"Mark" <mark_etheridge RemoveThis @volcanomail.com> writes: >1158481891.568143.53560@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... >> amacmil... RemoveThis @aol.com wrote (yet again): >> >> > Who's Pete? >> >> To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this >> simple (as I know you like very simple things)... >> >> Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever >> agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed >> out many times, but it's always Pete. >> >> Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete. The rest of >> us are normal... > >Very useful post, Mark. It's a troll, plain and simple. No surprise to see one slug agreeing with another. Nice post! >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Philip Hart

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 3

(Msg. 13) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. Troll alert! [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Pete" <g23434ssd DeleteThis @hotmail.com> writes: ck5qg2dcn14jteltfrjmv4s7s3ernfvs50 DeleteThis @4ax.com... > On 17 Sep 2006 01:31:31 -0700, "Mark" <mark_etheridge DeleteThis @volcanomail.com> > wrote: > > >amacmil...@aol.com wrote (yet again): > > > >> Who's Pete? > > > >To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this > >simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > > Anything more would stretch you! > > >Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever > >agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed > >out many times, but it's always Pete. > > I agree with him! Too late. We already knew you were Pete. Couldn't you go back to some of those lunatic names you used in the past? Geoff, Ian, Colin and so forth are so mundane. Oh, yes. Another thing. Stop sneaking into mummy's room and trying on her undies. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Geoff

External

Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32

(Msg. 14) Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:38 pm Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. Troll alert! [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:38:01 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphatr DeleteThis @aoI.con> wrote: > >"Pete" <g23434ssd DeleteThis @hotmail.com> writes: >ck5qg2dcn14jteltfrjmv4s7s3ernfvs50@4ax.com... >> On 17 Sep 2006 01:31:31 -0700, "Mark" <mark_etheridge DeleteThis @volcanomail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >amacmil...@aol.com wrote (yet again): >> > >> >> Who's Pete? >> > >> >To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this >> >simple (as I know you like very simple things)... >> >> Anything more would stretch you! >> >> >Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever >> >agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed >> >out many times, but it's always Pete. >> >> I agree with him! > >Too late. We already knew you were Pete. Couldn't you go back to some of >those lunatic names you used in the past? Geoff, Ian, Colin and so forth are >so mundane. > >Oh, yes. Another thing. Stop sneaking into mummy's room and trying on her >undies. > How many warrants are outstanding for you, should you ever set foot in the UK? Shame you had to run. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Philip H. Hart

External

Since: Sep 18, 2006
Posts: 5

(Msg. 15) Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:26 am Post subject: Re: Pete goes back to being a man again. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Geoff wrote: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:32:17 +0200, "Philip Hart" <auldphatr.DeleteThis@aoI.con> > wrote: > > > > >"Mark" <mark_etheridge.DeleteThis@volcanomail.com> writes: > >1158481891.568143.53560@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... > >> amacmil....DeleteThis@aol.com wrote (yet again): > >> > >> > Who's Pete? > >> > >> To save you having to post this question any more, let's keep this > >> simple (as I know you like very simple things)... > >> > >> Pete is the name of the only person on any of these groups who ever > >> agrees with you, he may use different signatures as has been pointed > >> out many times, but it's always Pete. > >> > >> Remember Angus - if the poster agrees with you, it's Pete. The rest of > >> us are normal... > >Very useful post, Mark. Allows anyone who's watching to identify another new pseudonym by the troll Pete, who by all accounts likes sneaking into his mother's bedroom and trying her panties on for size. > > It's a troll, plain and simple. No surprise to see one slug agreeing > with another. > > Nice post! Well thank you, Pete. Guess you must have had mummy's frilly knickers pulled down over your eyes when you wrote it. >> Stay informed about: Pete goes back to being a man again.

Display posts from previous:

	Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights	All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum