Logic insists farmers cause them

"Ipse dixit" <nospam RemoveThis @email.com> wrote
>
> "Dutch" <no RemoveThis @email.com> wrote
> > "Ipse dixit" wrote:
> >
> > > Superior ethical vegans buy their food and goods from
> > > suppliers which may or may not have accrued collateral
> > > deaths while producing them
> >
> > So now there are "classes" of vegans, "regular", "superior", any others?
>
> No. All ethical vegans are superior, especially me.

At least we can put the old denial to rest now.. vegans DO believe they
enjoy moral superiority.

Since the vegans in your statement make no effort to know if collateral
deaths have occurred, how do they attain this moral superiority?

"Ipse dixit" <nospam.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote

> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:40:11 -0800, "Dutch" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote:
>
> >"Ipse dixit" <nospam.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote
> >>
> >> "Dutch" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote
> >> > "Ipse dixit" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Superior ethical vegans buy their food and goods from
> >> > > suppliers which may or may not have accrued collateral
> >> > > deaths while producing them
> >> >
> >> > So now there are "classes" of vegans, "regular", "superior", any
others?
> >>
> >> No. All ethical vegans are superior, especially me.
> >
> >At least we can put the old denial to rest now.. vegans DO believe they
> >enjoy moral superiority.
> >
> I can't speak for them all, but I certainly do.

They all do, although most deny it.

> >Since the vegans in your statement make no effort to know if collateral
> >deaths have occurred, how do they attain this moral superiority?
> >
> Plurium Interrogationum. Your question has a false or
> disputed presupposition: that the vegans I referred to
> in my statement make no effort to find out whether
> collateral deaths have occurred.

It's not in dispute, vegans neither inquire about nor care if their diet and
lifestyles result in collateral deaths, they only care about visible
evidence in the form of animal products.

[..]