Welcome to PetForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

GregGeorg...WankHar's moral incoherence

 
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights RSS
Related Topics:
GregGeorg...WankHar's whiffs off AGAIN (moral incoherence) - I just *love* this topic. It's a real delight to return to it from time to time. (he prefers for some reason, but it's not his name) believes, in a vague, mushy, way, in animal He feels, for reasons he..

WankHar: - Why do you use the stupid pseudonym It sounds like a comic book space alien

WankHar's ethical incoherence - WankHar doesn't want to be known as a and in fact denies that he is one. However, he eschews animal products for the *same* reason as he doesn't eschew *all* the animal products that

The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting.. - Dear The Third Reading of the Hunting Bill has been announced for 30th June. This is a critical vote for the future of hunting with dogs. The Hunting Bill, bans deer hunting, hare coursing and hare..

Virus Warning - I don't know why I bother, I suppose I'm just that kinda guy. There's a W32 Gibe.B@MM waiting for:- Rick Etter Dr. Doody I have receive a couple for the same source , never heard of the guy. It's the usual
Next:  More lies from usual suspect  
Author Message
Jonathan Ball

External


Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2003 7:15 pm
Post subject: GregGeorg...WankHar's moral incoherence
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)

I just *love* this topic. It's a real delight to
return to it from time to time.

GregGeorg...WankHar (he prefers "Zakhar", for some
reason, but it's not his name) believes, in a vague,
mushy, incoherent way, in animal "rights". He feels,
for reasons he can't explain, that it is wrong for
animals to be raised (no matter the condition of their
lives), slaughtered, and sold as meat in grocery
stores. He will, like a good little sleazy "ara", try
to carve out some kind of exemption for that mythical
man, the Eskimo on an ice floe. But he believes the
ordinary consumer in a developed economy should not be
allowed to buy meat in a grocery store.

GregGeorg...WankHar acknowledges that he does not
pursue his belief as far as "veganism". A "vegan" is
one who does not directly and knowingly - and, in a few
highly visible but entirely symbolic issues, indirectly
- consume any animal product: no meat, no eggs, no
dairy products, no wool or leather clothing or
upholstery, no honey, no gelatin: if the product
contains even a microgram of animal parts, and the
"vegan" knows it, he will not consume it. As far as
avoiding animal use indirectly, the "vegan" will not
consume cosmetic products that have been tested on
animals, but they (shame!) will gladly consume
medicines that have been similarly tested on animals.

So, GregGeorg...WankHar confesses he is not a "vegan".
He is a coward, so he refuses to divulge the specific
ways in which he diverges from "veganism". Does he eat
some meat, maybe poultry? Does he consume some dairy
products, or eggs? Does he wear leather? Does he use
cosmetics (tee hee!) that have been tested on animals?
Because he's gutless, he won't say; we just know that
he declares himself NOT "vegan".

Now, "vegans" are already, themselves, incoherent,
because even if they don't *consume* animals, they
nonetheless cause massive numbers of them to be killed.
However, they can tell you fairly quickly where they
draw the line, and why. They draw it to exclude any
product that contains animal parts, and to exclude
cosmetics - but NOT medicines - that were tested on
animals. It's a stupid rule, but it's pretty clear.

Not GregGeorg...WankHar, though! WankHar consumes
products that contain animal parts. He can't tell you
why he consumes some and not others. He has babbled
stupidly in the past about some weighing of interests,
but it is clear he has no clear idea of how to weigh
them, except in a slovenly, ad hoc, off-the-cuff
manner. There is no theory, no set of objective
standard. It's just whatever feels good to
GregGeorg...WankHar, right then and there. He could
well decide differently the following day, differently
again the day after that, indefinitely.

GregGeorg...WankHar is completely incoherent. He's a
fruitcake.

 >> Stay informed about: GregGeorg...WankHar's moral incoherence 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]