 |
|
 |
|
Next: Test - Please ignore
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jul 28, 2003 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:48 am
Post subject: Grass fed beef? Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals (more info?)
|
|
|
I was just wondering, I'm a new "veg*n" and interested in construting
an entirely consistent philosophy on Animal Rights, whether or not it
continues to inludes veganism.
I've heard plenty of posts from Rick Etter and Dh and Jon Ball (I
think he's in on this posse too, I can't say for sure) about the
benefits of grass-fed cattle (as opposed to those who go to feed lots)
vs. factory farmed plants.
Did you hear that, guys? I've already read your initial points many
times over, and they make sense. I am trying to build a onsistent
philosophy using both these facts and those which onvinced me veganism
was the best answer. But something's missing....
I haven't seen a substantial "veg*n" response to these claims, outside
of the very reasonable point that one can oppose factory farming of
animals without hampioning factory farming of vegetables. I will
gladly support alternatives as they become apparant.
So I don't need to hear the same story over again. Please, I'm
looking for some new information from the veg*n side, and answers to
one question from the grass-fed posse:
What do you want me to do with this information? I gave up animal
products because there were alternatives to supporting the treatment
of animal's lives as inconvenient steps on their way to our plate.
Factory farmed vegetables an be replaced with organic alternatives,
though it is somewhat dubious how effectively organic farmers are
solving the problems you guys are championing. But probing deeper
into what I've heard you say: there are *no* humane alternatives to
wood. Plastic, metal etc. all harm the enviornment in at least
equally horrible ways. So what do you want me to do? If it's simply
to get rid of this attitude you talk so much about, this "My diet is
free of animal death" snub, then I've already got you covered. I do
not find the killing of animals for food inherently evil... I do find
the agriultural industry to be such. And as long as we must slaughter
some 25 billion or so animals annually to feed America, it will remain
that way. Is it possible to support that many animals on green acres?
Sorry to ramble, but just what am I supposed to do? Asking me to
leave society is simply unrealistic... should I follow your apparent
example and just give up? >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote
[..]
>
> > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
>
> I agree.
Can you see the difference between that statement and saying "a vegan diet
causes less animal death than an omnivorous diet"? >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 12:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
>
> "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote
> > It's not enough. The typical "vegan" diet is not
> > consistent with one in which animal "rights" are
> > respected to the same extent human rights are respected.
> >
> The same can be said of those who eat chocolate.
Crap, chocolate is produced here in Vancouver at "Purdy's". afaik no black
children are exploited.
Nonetheless, the principle would apply. If children were routinely abused,
poisoned and/or killed in the production of a product one would not be
respecting their rights if one purchased the product. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 15, 2003 Posts: 586
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals (more info?)
|
|
|
On 28 Jul 2003 08:48:30 -0700, everrpa.RemoveThis@hotmail.com (Bob) wrote:
>I was just wondering, I'm a new "veg*n" and interested in construting
>an entirely consistent philosophy on Animal Rights, whether or not it
>continues to inludes veganism.
>I've heard plenty of posts from Rick Etter and Dh and Jon Ball (I
>think he's in on this posse too, I can't say for sure) about the
>benefits of grass-fed cattle (as opposed to those who go to feed lots)
>vs. factory farmed plants.
>Did you hear that, guys? I've already read your initial points many
>times over, and they make sense. I am trying to build a onsistent
>philosophy using both these facts and those which onvinced me veganism
>was the best answer. But something's missing....
>I haven't seen a substantial "veg*n" response to these claims, outside
>of the very reasonable point that one can oppose factory farming of
>animals without hampioning factory farming of vegetables. I will
>gladly support alternatives as they become apparant.
>So I don't need to hear the same story over again. Please, I'm
>looking for some new information from the veg*n side, and answers to
>one question from the grass-fed posse:
>What do you want me to do with this information? I gave up animal
>products because there were alternatives to supporting the treatment
>of animal's lives as inconvenient steps on their way to our plate.
>Factory farmed vegetables an be replaced with organic alternatives,
>though it is somewhat dubious how effectively organic farmers are
>solving the problems you guys are championing. But probing deeper
>into what I've heard you say: there are *no* humane alternatives to
>wood. Plastic, metal etc. all harm the enviornment in at least
>equally horrible ways. So what do you want me to do? If it's simply
>to get rid of this attitude you talk so much about, this "My diet is
>free of animal death" snub, then I've already got you covered. I do
>not find the killing of animals for food inherently evil... I do find
>the agriultural industry to be such. And as long as we must slaughter
>some 25 billion or so animals annually to feed America, it will remain
>that way. Is it possible to support that many animals on green acres?
>Sorry to ramble, but just what am I supposed to do? Asking me to
>leave society is simply unrealistic... should I follow your apparent
>example and just give up?
It's not really a matter of what do we want you to do. It's
what do *you* want to do? Because that's what you're
going to do. It appears that you may want to give more
thought to exactly what it is you want for yourself. You
also appear able to recognise the fact that some types
of meat involve less deaths than some types of veggies.
If you really care about the animals, go out to some farms
and talk to some farmers. See for yourself how the
animals are raised. If you think they have a decent life,
and recognise that a grass raised steer can provide
hundreds of meals, then see if you want to contribute
to decent lives for cattle and less wildlife deaths than
with tofu. Don't worry about whether or not we can
support 25 billion of them that way (at least don't
worry about it yet :-), just go see the situation live
and decide what you think about it from there. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 28, 2003 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>
> It's not really a matter of what do we want you to do. It's
> what do *you* want to do? Because that's what you're
> going to do. It appears that you may want to give more
> thought to exactly what it is you want for yourself. You
> also appear able to recognise the fact that some types
> of meat involve less deaths than some types of veggies.
> If you really care about the animals, go out to some farms
> and talk to some farmers. See for yourself how the
> animals are raised. If you think they have a decent life,
> and recognise that a grass raised steer can provide
> hundreds of meals, then see if you want to contribute
> to decent lives for cattle and less wildlife deaths than
> with tofu. Don't worry about whether or not we can
> support 25 billion of them that way (at least don't
> worry about it yet :-), just go see the situation live
> and decide what you think about it from there.
What type of farm? I mean, where exactly does the supermarket variety
of grass-fed beef come from?
This does seem like a reasonable position. Of course, for most
purposes I would still be a vegan, as I do not get most of the
meat/eggs/dairy I eat from the supermarket, I get it from a cafeteria
or a fast food joint or a friend's house. In these situations I do
not have the option of specifying the diet of my lunch. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 178
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote in message news:viasnfpvuk0c86@news.supernews.com...
> "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> wrote
> [..]
> >
> > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> >
> > I agree.
>
> Can you see the difference between that statement and saying "a vegan diet
> causes less animal death than an omnivorous diet"?
>
No. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 8:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
>
> "Dutch" <no.RemoveThis@email.com> wrote
> > "Derek" <dereknash.RemoveThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote
> > [..]
> > >
> > > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> > >
> > > I agree.
> >
> > Can you see the difference between that statement and saying "a vegan
diet
> > causes less animal death than an omnivorous diet"?
> >
> No.
Interesting.. the obvious difference is the word *typical* is in the first
statement twice. That means the statement refers to a particular diet, not
strictly defined, but assumed to be largely derived from commerical
agribusiness farming, factory farmed meat and vegetables, some fast food,
maybe some local, but not a lot, etc.. you know.. *typical*.
The second statement "a vegan diet causes less animal death than an
omnivorous diet" has no modifiers, it's a categorical statement. It's like
saying blacks are stronger than whites, or dogs are larger than cats. Unless
you agree that you mean "typical" or "average" or use some other narrowing
modifier, the statement is a false generalization. This apparently minor
error leads to a monstrously wrong conclusion.
In the case of the typical vegan's outlook, the statement is taken as
categorically true. This is evident from the fact that virtually all vegans
(yes there are exceptions) believe that by removing meat from their diet and
animal products from their lifestyle they *necessarily* are decreasing the
death toll associated. As a result for example, they are unable or unwilling
to accept that a lifestyle that includes animal products may actually be
superior in these respects. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 178
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 9:53 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote in message news:vib300251mt072@news.supernews.com...
> "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> >
> > "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote
> > > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> wrote
> > > [..]
> > > >
> > > > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> > > >
> > > > I agree.
> > >
> > > Can you see the difference between that statement
> > > and saying "a vegan diet causes less animal death
> > > than an omnivorous diet"?
> > >
> > No.
>
> Interesting.
No, it isn't. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:42 am
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
>
> "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote
> > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > >
> > > "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote
> > > > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > > > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> wrote
> > > > [..]
> > > > >
> > > > > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > > > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> > > > >
> > > > > I agree.
> > > >
> > > > Can you see the difference between that statement
> > > > and saying "a vegan diet causes less animal death
> > > > than an omnivorous diet"?
> > > >
> > > No.
> >
> > Interesting.
>
> No, it isn't.
Curious that a person such as you would strive so hard to live in the dark. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 178
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 7:10 am
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Dutch" <no.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote in message news:LhkVa.546774$3C2.14102674@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
> >
> > "Dutch" <no.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote
> > > "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > >
> > > > "Dutch" <no.DeleteThis@email.com> wrote
> > > > > "Derek" <dereknash.DeleteThis@btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > > > > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote
> > > > > [..]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > > > > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I agree.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you see the difference between that statement
> > > > > and saying "a vegan diet causes less animal death
> > > > > than an omnivorous diet"?
> > > > >
> > > > No.
> > >
> > > Interesting.
> >
> > No, it isn't.
>
> Curious
Nope. Not even that. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:54 am
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:bg5353$kp421$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote in message
news:LhkVa.546774$3C2.14102674@news3.calgary.shaw.ca...
> > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > >
> > > "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote
> > > > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > > >
> > > > > "Dutch" <no DeleteThis @email.com> wrote
> > > > > > "Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote
> > > > > > > "Jonathan Ball" <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> wrote
> > > > > > [..]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
> > > > > > > > meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I agree.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can you see the difference between that statement
> > > > > > and saying "a vegan diet causes less animal death
> > > > > > than an omnivorous diet"?
> > > > > >
> > > > > No.
> > > >
> > > > Interesting.
> > >
> > > No, it isn't.
> >
> > Curious
>
> Nope. Not even that.
Oh yes it is, it's a fascinating cognitive phenomenon >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:17 pm
Post subject: Re: NO Child slavery and chocolate, according to Jonathan ball [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Derek" <dereknash DeleteThis @btopenworld.com> wrote ..nothing relevant to the ethics
of slaughtering animals en masse to produce plant-foods.
When are you going to stop running and face my questions? >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2003 Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Shit4braincell wrote:
>>>>>>A *typical* "vegan" diet compared to a *typical*
>>>>>>meat-including diet will cause less animal death.
>>>>>
>>>>>I agree.
>>>>
>>>>It's not enough. The typical "vegan" diet is not
>>>>consistent with one in which animal "rights" are
>>>>respected to the same extent human rights are respected.
>>>>
>>>
>>>The same can be said of those who eat chocolate.
>>
>>No. You're relying, as usual, on someone else's bad work.
>>
>>
>>>The typical chocolate included diet is not consistent
>>>with one in which human rights for black children are
>>>respected to the same extent human rights are
>>>respected in other industries,
>>
>>Prove it.
You don't even try.
>>
>>
>>>but that doesn't mean
>>>to say those black kids don't have rights, so your
>>>rule is flawed.
>>
>>If children in cocoa-growing countries were exploited
>>in a way that is inconsistent with human rights, which
>>they are not, then it *would* mean that the children
>>didn't effectively have rights.
>>
>>There is no such rights-violating exploitation, of
>>course, so your whole point is moot.
>
>
> [According to the United States Labor Department,
> some 284,000 child laborers in West Africa -
> 200,000 of them in Ivory Coast - work in hazardous
> conditions in the cocoa business.
Not a rights violation.
> Last year, this began
> to raise the same kind of protests among advocacy
> groups that have dogged other industries linked to
> low-cost third world operations.
> The chocolate industry says that the use of child labor
> is part of longstanding local tradition that the advocates
> have distorted for their own ends.
This is true.
>
> "This was presented as slavery, but it was just the
> normal practice of families using children to run the
> family freeholding," said François-Xavier Perroud, a
> spokesman for Nestlé in Switzerland.
Perroud is correct.
Shit4braincell, it does not advance the discussion when
you just repost some useless bullshit. That is an
admission that you've lost.
You've lost. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 02, 2003 Posts: 1110
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Jonathan Ball opposes child slavery, and very effectively, because it doesn't exist [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2003 Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Grass fed beef? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dutch wrote:
> Shit4braincell wrote in message
> news:bg5353$kp421$1@ID-190488.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
>>>>>>>Can you see the difference between that statement
>>>>>>>and saying "a vegan diet causes less animal death
>>>>>>>than an omnivorous diet"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No.
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting.
>>>>
>>>>No, it isn't.
>>>
>>>Curious
>>
>>Nope. Not even that.
>
>
> Oh yes it is, it's a fascinating cognitive phenomenon
Shit4braincell isn't even in some kind of denial. He's
a cynical and deliberate liar. He has a goal -
declaring himself "more" moral than some - and he is
enough of a sociopath that he'll say and do anything in
order to reach it. He doesn't fool anyone. >> Stay informed about: Grass fed beef? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | The *correct* calculation of a feed:beef ratio - Dreck can't do it. He keeps using a waste percentage that is based on the *entire* weight of the animal, and that's WRONG: the weight gained in the feedlot is virtually ALL edible beef; maybe 5% is not edible. Every page Dreck has found indicates..
Dreck's grotesque miscalculation of feed:beef - A beef steer typically eats about 17 pounds per day of dry matter grain, and gains 3 pounds per day in weight. That's a ratio of 5.7:1. Since we know the animal gains 400 pounds, we can calculate the total weight of dry matter eaten as 400 * 5.7 =...
Dreck Nash will never give the facts of beef production - He doesn't know them, and he doesn't want to find out.
The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting.. - Dear Supporter: The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting Bill has been announced for 30th June. This is a critical vote for the future of hunting with dogs. The Government's Hunting Bill, bans deer hunting, hare coursing and hare..
Virus Warning - I don't know why I bother, I suppose I'm just that kinda guy. There's a W32 Gibe.B@MM waiting for:- ~~Jonnie~~ Rick Etter Dr. Doody I have receive a couple for the same source KenHedges@insightbb.com , never heard of the guy. It's the usual Microsoft.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|