Welcome to PetForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Fuckwit can't do it

  
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights RSS
Next:  Has Labour Banned Foxhunting?  
Author Message
Rudy Canoza

External


Since: Jan 14, 2005
Posts: 345



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 5:08 pm
Post subject: Fuckwit can't do it
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
Fuckwit keeps trying to establish his false choice. He
keeps pretending the choice is between "decent lives
for farm animals" and "no life for farm animals", when
in fact the ONLY choice that features "no life" as one
of the options necessarily has "life" as the other,
without any modifier like "decent".

Show how it is morally superior to cause farm animals
to exist, Fuckwit, versus wanting them not to exist.
If you can't (heh heh heh), then you have no reason to
be here.

 >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit can't do it 
Back to top
Login to vote
dh_ld

External


Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Fuckwit can't do it [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:08:54 GMT, Gonad wrote:

>Fuckwit keeps trying to establish his false choice. He
>keeps pretending the choice is between "decent lives
>for farm animals" and "no life for farm animals", when
>in fact the ONLY choice that features "no life" as one
>of the options necessarily has "life" as the other,
>without any modifier like "decent".
>
>Show how it is morally superior to cause farm animals
>to exist, Fuckwit, versus wanting them not to exist.
>If you can't (heh heh heh), then you have no reason to
>be here.

Wrong Gonad. I have shown that you "ARAs" can
provide no reason why we should change. You are the
ones who want to make the change, and I have shown
that there's no reason why we should make the change
that you suggest.

Show how it is morally superior to prevent farm animals from
existing, Gonad, versus wanting them not have decent lives.
If you can't (heh heh heh), then you have no reason to
be here.

 >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit can't do it 
Back to top
Login to vote
dh_ld

External


Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586



(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Feb 24, 2005 1:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Fuckwit can't do it [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
On 23 Feb 2005 09:30:35 -0800, the Gonad lied:

>Mr Harrison wrote:

>> Show how it is morally superior to prevent farm animals from
>> existing
>
>Not my job, Fuckwit, because I don't want to eliminate farm animals.
_________________________________________________________
From: Jonathan Ball <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Subject: Re: "getting to experience life" = the (il)logic of the larder
Message-ID: <a6K%b.10491$yZ1.3559@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:19:18 GMT

the "getting to experience
life" deserves NO moral consideration, and is given
none; the deliberate killing of animals for use by
humans DOES deserve moral consideration, and gets it.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
From: Dieter <d.Schmidt RemoveThis @deutsche_telekom.de>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.philosophy
Subject: Re: Why existence -- life per se -- *cannot* be a "benefit"
Message-ID: <Ydpwc.2521$uX2.1318@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 19:33:12 GMT

ONLY deliberate human killing deserves any
moral consideration.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
From: Dieter <d.Schmidt RemoveThis @deutsche_telekom.de>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.philosophy
Subject: Re: JethroFW in full melt-down
Message-ID: <V7nyc.10462$uX2.2180@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:48:21 GMT

humans deliberately killing animals for food is an immoral
thing to do.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
From: Jonathan Ball <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Subject: Re: "getting to experience life" = the (il)logic of the larder
Message-ID: <GwI2c.488$Cm3.256@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:58:14 GMT

We're ONLY talking about deliberate human killing
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
Message-ID: <40423A83.5040207 RemoveThis @whitehouse.not>
From: Jonathan Ball <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Newsgroups: talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
Subject: Karen Winter's abandonment of her son, and why it matters
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:15:39 GMT

killing the animals needlessly and merely for human convenience
is the worst violation of their rights.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
From: "Rudy Canoza" <notgenx32 RemoveThis @yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan
Subject: Re: Skunky pisses all over the trolls
Date: 28 Jan 2005 15:01:28 -0800
Message-ID: <1106953288.386977.29670 RemoveThis @z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

Fact: IF it is wrong to kill animals deliberately for food, then
having deliberately caused them to live in the first place does not
mitigate the wrong in any way.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
_________________________________________________________
From: Rudy Canoza <someguy RemoveThis @ph.con>
Newsgroups: alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan
Subject: Re: Skunky pisses all over the trolls
Message-ID: <Q4RKd.2867$Ix.1159@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:02:08 GMT

"giving them life" does NOT mitigate the wrongness of
their deaths
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
 >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit can't do it 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Why do you still bother, Fuckwit? - Your trick is fully demolished, Fuckwit. You keep trying to confuse "decent lives for farm animals" with "getting to experience life (for farm animals)", and no one is confused. You don't care a thing about "decent lives for...

Fuckwit's beliefs - Fuckwit posts as dh_ld@nomail.com Fuckwit, who sometimes uses the alias "David Harrison", has long insisted that I have "lied" about his beliefs. I have never lied about his beliefs. He has written thousands of usenet posts based on...

Fuckwit: get busy - Get with it, Fuckwit. Your bullshit story needs to be directed to "unethical" meat eaters - those who don't care about animal welfare - rather than to "vegans". Your comparison - "decent lives" for animals vs. "no life...

Fuckwit's beliefs - the two crucial ones - Fuckwit is 'dh_ld@nomail.com'. Fuckwit's goofy attempt at a trick is to pretend he is urging "vegans" to "promote decent lives" for farm animals, when in fact, we see that he wants "vegans" to support life per se, not de...

The incredible lightness of being Fuckwit - Fuckwit, you don't do yourself any favors by refusing to answer direct questions, or answering them in your usual cutesy dumb redneck manner. Try answering a direct question, for once. Why do you insist on trying to maintain confusion between life....
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]