Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

FAQ

Profile

Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12

Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights

Next: Spanish Royal Wedding

Author

Message

Jonathan Ball

External

Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869

(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu May 06, 2004 5:54 pm Post subject: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he doesn't limit his. Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. Fuckwit has far LESS ability than almost everyone else posting here (with the possible exception of Bong Janssen, and excepting the unlamented Teddy ~~Budell~~, but Budell is confirmed to be a victim of Agent Orange poisoning.) I want to make explicitly clear: Fuckwit has less ability even than most of the "aras" who post here. Notable exceptions are Ray Slater and Ron Hamilton: those two can't tie their own shoes. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

dh_ld

External

Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586

(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 3:43 pm Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: >Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >doesn't limit his. > >Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to understand that some farm animals benefit from farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified people might consider that there could be ethically equivalent or superior options to vegnism. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

Ron

External

Since: Jan 16, 2004
Posts: 42

(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 12:53 pm Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

dh_ld.DeleteThis@nomail.com wrote in message news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb.DeleteThis@4ax.com>... > On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: > > >Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and > >other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks > >he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit > >thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he > >doesn't limit his. > > > >Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. > > Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to > understand that some farm animals benefit from > farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware > of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose > it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified > people might consider that there could be ethically > equivalent or superior options to vegnism. No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered any more than any man would. You are a demented loon. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

JethroUK©

External

Since: May 09, 2004
Posts: 87

(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 9:55 pm Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ron" <banmilk.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com... > dh_ld.RemoveThis@nomail.com wrote in message news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb.RemoveThis@4ax.com>... > > On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: > > > > >Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and > > >other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks > > >he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit > > >thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he > > >doesn't limit his. > > > > > >Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. > > > > Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to > > understand that some farm animals benefit from > > farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware > > of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose > > it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified > > people might consider that there could be ethically > > equivalent or superior options to vegnism. > > > > No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born at all - it's very life is a benefit - old chestnut >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

Jonathan Ball

External

Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869

(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 2:58 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

JethroUK© wrote: > "Ron" <banmilk DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com... > >>dh_ld@nomail.com wrote in message > > news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb DeleteThis @4ax.com>... > >>>On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> > > wrote: > >>>>Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >>>>other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >>>>he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >>>>thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >>>>doesn't limit his. >>>> >>>>Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. >>> >>> Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to >>>understand that some farm animals benefit from >>>farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware >>>of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose >>>it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified >>>people might consider that there could be ethically >>>equivalent or superior options to vegnism. >> >> >> >> No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered > > > course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born > at all - it's very life is a benefit Its life is not a benefit. Life per se is not a benefit - ever. An entity must exist in order to realize any kind of benefit. Prior to existing, there was no entity - nothing to realize the benefit. It's very simple. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

ipse dixit

External

Since: Apr 13, 2004
Posts: 2

(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 6:41 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Jonathan Ball" <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote in message news:PdCnc.14731$Hs1.1093@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > JethroUK© wrote: > > "Ron" <banmilk RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com.. > >>dh_ld@nomail.com wrote in message news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb RemoveThis @4ax.com>... > >>>On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote: > > > >>>>Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and > >>>>other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks > >>>>he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit > >>>>thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he > >>>>doesn't limit his. > >>>> > >>>>Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. > >>> > >>> Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to > >>>understand that some farm animals benefit from > >>>farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware > >>>of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose > >>>it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified > >>>people might consider that there could be ethically > >>>equivalent or superior options to vegnism. > >> > >> No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered > > > > course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born > > at all - it's very life is a benefit > > Its life is not a benefit. Life per se is not a > benefit - ever. An entity must exist in order to > realize any kind of benefit. Prior to existing, there > was no entity - nothing to realize the benefit. > > It's very simple. heh heh heh. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

ipse dixit

External

Since: Mar 20, 2004
Posts: 39

(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 9:17 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

On Sun, 9 May 2004 21:55:12 +0100, "JethroUK©" <reply.RemoveThis@the.board> wrote: >"Ron" <banmilk.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com... >> dh_ld.RemoveThis@nomail.com wrote in message news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb.RemoveThis@4ax.com>... >> > On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not>wrote: >> > >> > >Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >> > >other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >> > >he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >> > >thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >> > >doesn't limit his. >> > > >> > >Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. >> > >> > Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to >> > understand that some farm animals benefit from >> > farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware >> > of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose >> > it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified >> > people might consider that there could be ethically >> > equivalent or superior options to vegnism. >> >> No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered > >course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born >at all - it's very life is a benefit - old chestnut If humans didn't eat them, farm-animals wouldn't get to experience life, so those in favour for the abolition of animal farming are thereby depriving future farm animals of that experience and are morally wrong, according to most. Do you agree? Farm animals owe their very lives to the people who eat them, and this morally justifies bringing them into being in the first place, doesn't it? It's an interesting thought. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

dh_ld

External

Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586

(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 11:24 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

On Sun, 09 May 2004 16:52:58 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: >I caught your shit4braincell addition of unrelated >newsgroups and removed them, Fuckwit. You lose. You >stupid cunt-hair: you always lose. > >FUCKWIT David Harrison dh_ld.DeleteThis@nomail.com wrote: >> On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.DeleteThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: >> >> >>>Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >>>other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >>>he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >>>thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >>>doesn't limit his. >>> >>>Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. >> >> >> I really don't believe you are too stupid to >> understand that some farm animals benefit from >> farming. > >NO ANIMALS "benefit" from farming, Fuckwit. Some do and some don't Gonad. You "ARAs" only want people to consider those who don't. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

dh_ld

External

Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586

(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 11:31 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 9 May 2004 12:53:11 -0700, banmilk RemoveThis @hotmail.com (Ron) wrote: >dh_ld@nomail.com wrote in message news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb RemoveThis @4ax.com>... >> On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball RemoveThis @whitehouse.not> wrote: >> >> >Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >> >other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >> >he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >> >thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >> >doesn't limit his. >> > >> >Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. >> >> Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to >> understand that some farm animals benefit from >> farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware >> of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose >> it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified >> people might consider that there could be ethically >> equivalent or superior options to vegnism. > > > > No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered any more than >any man would. You are a demented loon. Life is a death sentence. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

dh_ld

External

Since: Jul 15, 2003
Posts: 586

(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 11:31 am Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

On Mon, 10 May 2004 02:58:55 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> wrote: >JethroUK© wrote: >> "Ron" <banmilk DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com... >> >>>dh_ld@nomail.com wrote in message >> >> news:<ljvp90p2tmdnm08iblgjk5d38himd92rjb DeleteThis @4ax.com>... >> >>>>On Thu, 06 May 2004 17:54:29 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball DeleteThis @whitehouse.not> >> >> wrote: >> >>>>>Fuckwit believes he "sees" philosophical truths and >>>>>other abstractions that others cannot. Fuckwit thinks >>>>>he has special insights, special abilities. Fuckwit >>>>>thinks that others "limit" their thinking, while he >>>>>doesn't limit his. >>>>> >>>>>Fuckwit is wrong about all of it. >>>> >>>> Gonad, I really don't believe you are too stupid to >>>>understand that some farm animals benefit from >>>>farming. I'm quite sure that you are every bit as aware >>>>of the fact as I am, and that is exactly why you oppose >>>>it so very very VERY!!! much. You "ARAs" are terrified >>>>people might consider that there could be ethically >>>>equivalent or superior options to vegnism. >>> >>> >>> >>> No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered >> >> >> course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born >> at all - it's very life is a benefit > >Its life is not a benefit. Life per se is not a >benefit - ever. Life is the benefit which makes all others possible. >An entity must exist in order to >realize any kind of benefit. An entity must have life in order to realize any kind of benefit. >Prior to existing, there >was no entity - nothing to realize the benefit. > >It's very simple. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability*

Jonathan Ball

External

Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869

(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon May 10, 2004 2:14 pm Post subject: Re: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

ipse dixit

External

Since: Mar 20, 2004
Posts: 39

(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:43 am Post subject: Re: Harrison is all but alone; Dreck is a liar [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 11 May 2004 00:20:24 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote: >ipse dixit wrote: >> On Mon, 10 May 2004 21:18:07 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote: >>>ipse dixit wrote: >>>>On Mon, 10 May 2004 20:33:01 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.TakeThisOut@whitehouse.not> wrote: >>>>>ipse dixit wrote: >>>>>>On Sun, 9 May 2004 21:55:12 +0100, "JethroUK©" <reply.TakeThisOut@the.board> wrote: >>>>>>>"Ron" <banmilk.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:436a5d81.0405091153.6266b1f0@posting.google.com... >>>> >>>>>>>>No animal benefits from being bred to be slaughtered >>>>>>> >>>>>>>course it does - if it wasn't bred to be slaughtered - it wouldn't been born >>>>>>>at all - it's very life is a benefit - old chestnut >>>>>> >>>>>>If humans didn't eat them, farm-animals wouldn't get >>>>>>to experience life, so those in favour for the abolition >>>>>>of animal farming are thereby depriving future farm >>>>>>animals of that experience and are morally wrong, >>>>>>according to most. Do you agree? >>>>> >>>>>No, Dreck, NOT "according to most". >>>> >>>>According to more than half >>> >>>No. You have zero support for that, >> >> Apart from the numerous quotes I have from posters >> here on these animal related forums > >No. Yes. > >> Harrison is not alone. In fact, he's in with the majority. > >No. Yes. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

Dutch

External

Since: Jul 02, 2003
Posts: 1110

(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:43 am Post subject: Re: Harrison is all but alone; Dreck is a liar [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"ipse dixit" <f.RemoveThis@chance.com> wrote > On Tue, 11 May 2004 00:20:24 GMT, Jonathan Ball <jonball.RemoveThis@whitehouse.not> wrote: > > >> Harrison is not alone. In fact, he's in with the majority. > > > >No. > > Yes. That's why your pseudonym suits you so well. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

JethroUK©

External

Since: May 09, 2004
Posts: 87

(Msg. 14) Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:15 pm Post subject: Re: Harrison is not alone [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

> > "ARAs" try to create the impression that animals are > >simply killed to feed meat consumers. > > And that is the whole truth, but you and meatarians > like yourself try to justify your ugly use of animals by > illogically believing they owe you for their existence. Fact! - Live stock do owe their very existence to meat eaters - coz if we dont want to eat em they wouldn't be there at all >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

Jonathan Ball

External

Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 869

(Msg. 15) Posted: Tue May 11, 2004 6:15 pm Post subject: Re: Harrison is not alone [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: talk>politics>animals, others (more info?)

JethroUK© wrote: >>> "ARAs" try to create the impression that animals are >>>simply killed to feed meat consumers. >> >>And that is the whole truth, but you and meatarians >>like yourself try to justify your ugly use of animals by >>illogically believing they owe you for their existence. > > > Fact! - Live stock do owe their very existence to meat eaters Livestock don't "owe" anything, you idiot. Being born and "getting to experience life" is not a "benefit" to livestock. >> Stay informed about: Fuckwit (Harrison) and lack of ability

Display posts from previous:

Related Topics:

David Fuckwit Harrison continues to stumble - Fuckwit - that's Harrison's real name - apparently will never learn. He keeps pretending that he's interested in "promoting decent lives" for farm animals, i.e., better lives rather than worse lives. He is not. What he's "promoting&...

Why do you still bother, Fuckwit? - Your trick is fully demolished, Fuckwit. You keep trying to confuse "decent lives for farm animals" with "getting to experience life (for farm animals)", and no one is confused. You don't care a thing about "decent lives for...

Fuckwit's beliefs - the two crucial ones - Fuckwit is 'dh_ld@nomail.com'. Fuckwit's goofy attempt at a trick is to pretend he is urging "vegans" to "promote decent lives" for farm animals, when in fact, we see that he wants "vegans" to support life per se, not de...

The incredible lightness of being Fuckwit - Fuckwit, you don't do yourself any favors by refusing to answer direct questions, or answering them in your usual cutesy dumb redneck manner. Try answering a direct question, for once. Why do you insist on trying to maintain confusion between life....

FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs (posted as needed) - Fuckwit, who sometimes uses the alias "David Harrison", has long insisted that I have "lied" about his beliefs. I have never lied about his beliefs. He has written thousands of usenet posts based on his beliefs, and I have correctly ...

	Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights	All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change) Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Page 1 of 12

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum