Derek's View of Animals

External Since: Jun 30, 2003 Posts: 148

"I see no reason why we shouldn't continue to farm and eat them."

Derek 03/11/03 13:14

External Since: Jul 01, 2003 Posts: 178

"Zakhar" <nospam.RemoveThis@donotuse123.com> wrote in message news:%gApb.676$mX3.746009@stones.force9.net...
> "I see no reason why we shouldn't continue to farm and eat them."
>
> Derek 03/11/03 13:14

>
Here's what I wrote, you lying, covert supporter of vivisection.

"By partially accepting Harrison's argument, I'm sticking
my neck out as far as I can on this. If animals can be
farmed to old age in perfect bucolic settings with vetinary
care, I see no reason why we shouldn't continue to farm
and eat them. It's the abattoir and frequent abuses of their
right to freedoms that stops me agreeing with him fully."
Derek 03/11/03

Now that we've seen your pathetic attempt to get one
back at me for ruining your AR pose, when are you
going to explain why you support vivisection while also
claiming to support animal rights "Zakhar"?

"for example if one rabbit would save 1000
humans, then I could accept that the rabbit
should die."
Zakhar 2003-02-02

"The real life case of a 19 year old with vCJD
being experimented on without his consent, is
a form of vivisection. Most of us can accept
that it was the right thing to do, in this sad case.
We can take the same decision making process,
independent of species."
Zakhar 2003-09-28

From that, as well as your other example, you
have unwittingly shown that you do support
vivisection. You believes that "most of us can
accept that it's the right thing to do", and that
"we can take the same decision making process,
independent of species."

And

"There can be cases for animal experimentation
as there can be for human experiments. It would
make sense to test a new antibiotic for guinea
pigs on guinea pigs rather than humans, don't
you think?"
Zakhar 2003-02-17