>Nuff said... dog owners will hopefully appreciate this little tale
>about how the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce would treat you if
>you had been in the same circumstance.
Nope, even tho I'm an animal lover, what happened to your dog was your own lack
of planning.
I don't quite understand why you needed $500 for the euthanasia and disposal of
your Gordon -- seems a steep price -- but I guess that doesn't really matter.
All large banking institutions are going to basically treat customers the same
way. You were obviously new to the bank and this also obviously isn't a mom &
pop operation bank. If you wanted someone who could bend that sort of
regulation, you needed to put some cash on hand with one of your children or
with a neighborhood child who just *might* be agreeable to some flexibility
(not all children are).
And it's far from just banks. Heck, a couple of months ago I called to make an
appointment to have a repairman come to the house to fix my clothes washer and
the person I was talking to on the phone, the person who was making the
appointment for me, wasn't even in the U.S. I doubt he'd have been able to
give me any flexibility had I needed some.
Just last month I had to make an appointment for Comcast to come out and fix
the cable link. Seemed like it took a year just to get thru their telephone
menu and when I did, I found out that they basically work 9 to 4 and if I want
service, I get to stay home from work and wait for them or ask a friend or
neighbor to stay home from work and wait for them. The option was cancelling
my cable -- and they were perfectly agreeable to doing that for me -- but they
had no flexibility to offer.
I wanted to ask BankOne a question about my mortgage -- it seemed like it took
an eternity just to listen to their menu options. Then it took another
eternity to get an actual human being on the phone and the person was in AZ and
I'm in IL. Which didn't matter in my case, but it points to the fact that
there's no incentive for "flexibility" -- a person isn't even in the same
community as the person on the other end of the line. And they just plain
don't have the authority, so why would anyone stick their neck out for some
anonymous caller on the other end of the line?
Because of your own lack of planning, you unfairly berate a telephone employee
and his/her supervisor who just might have been animal lovers themselves and
upset about the fact that they were helpless given the situation.
If you've lived in the U.S. for any length of time at all, you really should
have a clue about how things are changing towards the worse as far as any
individuality. The larger a company becomes, the more rules and regulations
that have to apply to, unfortunately, everybody. For the most part, the little
people on the other end of the telephone don't have the authority to make
decisions anymore, nor do their supervisors. I don't think that'd come as any
surprise to any American. What comes as a surprise is on those rare occasions
that one *does* come across a company that's truly goes out of it's way to be
accomodating. That's refreshing to see every so often.
So.........
You made a move to a different country.
You made the move with a dog that you already knew was dying. Moves are
stressful and cancer victims don't handle stress the greatest, whether they're
human or canine it can send them downhill. But whether you knew that or not,
or whether you could postpone the move or not, you still knew the dog had
terminal cancer.
You made this move knowing that the bulk of your money would be tied up yet you
appear to have only kept a small amount of cash on hand for emergencies. You
were six days into a ten day hold on your money. Euthanasia doesn't even cost
all that much. What if you had happened to have a little more expensive
emergency in those last four days of the hold? In other words you're moving to
a new country where the community doesn't know you but you're expecting them to
make up for *your* lack of planning.
The person who would have been in the position most able to be flexible would
have been the veterinarian. Did you telephone the vet and explain the
situation? No. In fact, you waited 20 minutes before you even telephoned the
bank. That's a long time.
There's no way of knowing if the vet *would* have been flexible. I know plenty
of them who would not have been. You weren't an established client. I don't
know whether or not you have other pets at home that the vet will be treating
in the future. A lot of vet clinics have been burned in situations like this
so no longer are flexible with folks who aren't well-established clients. But
that would have been the place to start -- not with berating some poor
telephone clerk for the bank.
I'm sorry for your loss, but I'm sorrier for the dog. And I can't help
wondering a little if the berating-of-the-bank isn't just a little bit out of
guilt. In other words, possibly you're feeling guilty that you didn't decide to
euthanise earlier? This way you can blame the bank in your mind for the
suffering. I'm not saying you *should* have euthanised her earlier. Not
knowing the dog, of course I can't judge that, nor would I be able to judge
that even if I'd known the dog. That's something that's between dog and
companion human. But I do know that a good number of humans go thru a
guilt-trip after the death of a dog with a terminal disease. Should they have
done it sooner -- did they wait too long? Should they have waited -- would
there still have been more good quality of life ahead? These are questions
that a huge number of dog owners can relate to. And sometimes other family
members will put the dog owner thru a guilt-trip, as in a "See?? If you had
agreed to put that dog down last month, this wouldn't be happening now!" sort
of thing.
I'm just wondering if that might not be what's going on here, needing to find
someone, anyone, to blame for the suffering.
Cindy
>> Stay informed about: Death of a Gordon Setter and Canadian Imperial Bank of Com..