|
Related Topics:
| MMMMMMMMMMMM MEAT! - If god didn't want us to eat animals, then he wouldn't have made them out of meat.
Declare independence from meat - Declare from meat What ever happened to the good old days, when the Fourth of July was just Day and the worst things we had to fear were traffic jams and wayward Recent findings by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control..
Meat eaters contribute to life and death - · Since the animals we raise for food would not be alive if we didn't raise them for that purpose, it's a of reality not to take that fact into whenever we think about the fact that the animals are going to be killed. The animals..
RSPB spend 6,000guineas in public donations, to buy bull f.. - Did you know the RSPB produce and sell meat and Is this what we give our donations for? Did you know RSPB are also partners with many groups, who provide sport shooting to the hoity toity? On Islay it owns the 2000 hectare..
Bitchup's son's drunk driving case - Bitchup, how did this come out? Was he Is he out picking up trash on 71 and/or 675, or maybe U.S. 35? Does his tendency to get into trouble come from your side of the family, or poor How many times did your dad..
|
|
|
Next: Animals Rights: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs (posted as needed)
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: May 18, 2004 Posts: 184
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 9:12 pm
Post subject: The Case Against Meat. Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
Here you are.
Never mind the quality feel the width, and it's all true.
Sent to me by an active ARA.
The Case Against Meat
Evidence Shows that Our Meat-Based Diet is Bad for the Environment,
Aggravates Global Hunger, Brutalizes Animals and Compromises Our Health
by Jim Motavalli
There has never been a better time for environmentalists to become
vegetarians. Evidence of the environmental impacts of a meat-based diet is
piling up at the same time its health effects are becoming better known.
Meanwhile, full-scale industrialized factory farming<which allows diseases
to spread quickly as animals are raised in close confinement<has given rise
to recent, highly publicized epidemics of meat-borne illnesses. At
presstime, the first discovery of mad cow disease in a Tokyo suburb caused
beef prices to plummet in Japan and many people to stop eating meat.
All this comes at a time when meat consumption is reaching an all-time high
around the world, quadrupling in the last 50 years. There are 20 billion
head of livestock taking up space on the Earth, more than triple the number
of people. According to the Worldwatch Institute, global livestock
population has increased 60 percent since 1961, and the number of fowl being
raised for human dinner tables has nearly quadrupled in the same time
period, from 4.2 billion to 15.7 billion. U.S. beef and pork consumption has
tripled since 1970, during which time it has more than doubled in Asia.
Americans spend $110 billion a year on meat-intensive fast food, and its
growing popularity around the world may be a factor in dramatic increases in
global meat consumption.
© Jason Kremkau
One reason for the increase in meat consumption is the rise of fast-food
restaurants as an American dietary staple. As Eric Schlosser noted in his
best-selling book Fast Food Nation, ³Americans now spend more money on fast
food<$110 billion a year<than they do on higher education. They spend more
on fast food than on movies, books, magazines, newspapers, videos and
recorded music<combined.²
Strong growth in meat production and consumption continues despite mounting
evidence that meat-based diets are unhealthy, and that just about every
aspect of meat production<from grazing-related loss of cropland and open
space, to the inefficiencies of feeding vast quantities of water and grain
to cattle in a hungry world, to pollution from ³factory farms²<is an
environmental disaster with wide and sometimes catastrophic consequences.
Oregon State University agriculture professor Peter Cheeke calls factory
farming ³a frontal assault on the environment, with massive groundwater and
air pollution problems.²
World Hunger and Resources
The 4.8 pounds of grain fed to cattle to produce one pound of beef for human
beings represents a colossal waste of resources in a world still teeming
with people who suffer from profound hunger and malnutrition.
According to the British group Vegfam, a 10-acre farm can support 60 people
growing soybeans, 24 people growing wheat, 10 people growing corn and only
two producing cattle. Britain<with 56 million people<could support a
population of 250 million on an all-vegetable diet. Because 90 percent of
U.S. and European meat eaters¹ grain consumption is indirect (first being
fed to animals), westerners each consume 2,000 pounds of grain a year. Most
grain in underdeveloped countries is consumed directly.
Somalian famine victims line up for food handouts. Producing a pound of beef
requires 4.8 pounds of grain, and critics of our modern agricultural system
say that the spread of meat-based diets aggravates world hunger.
© David & Peter Turnley / Corbis
While it is true that many animals graze on land that would be unsuitable
for cultivation, the demand for meat has taken millions of productive acres
away from farm inventories. The cost of that is incalculable. As Diet For a
Small Planet author Frances Moore Lappé writes, imagine sitting down to an
eight-ounce steak. ³Then imagine the room filled with 45 to 50 people with
empty bowls in front of them. For the Ofeed cost¹ of your steak, each of
their bowls could be filled with a full cup of cooked cereal grains.²
Harvard nutritionist Jean Mayer estimates that reducing meat production by
just 10 percent in the U.S. would free enough grain to feed 60 million
people. Authors Paul and Anne Ehrlich note that a pound of wheat can be
grown with 60 pounds of water, whereas a pound of meat requires 2,500 to
6,000 pounds.
Environmental Costs
Energy-intensive U.S. factory farms generated 1.4 billion tons of animal
waste in 1996, which, the Environmental Protection Agency reports, pollutes
American waterways more than all other industrial sources combined. Meat
production has also been linked to severe erosion of billions of acres of
once-productive farmland and to the destruction of rainforests.
McDonald¹s took a group of British animal rights activists to court in the
1990s because they had linked the fast food giant to an unhealthy diet and
rainforest destruction. The defendants, who fought the company to a
standstill, made a convincing case. In court documents, the activists
asserted, ³From 1970 onwards, beef from cattle reared on ex-rainforest land
was supplied to McDonald¹s.² In a policy statement, McDonald¹s claims that
it ³does not purchase beef which threatens tropical rainforests anywhere in
the world,² but it does not deny past purchases.
Circle Four Farms, a Utah-based pork producer, hosts a three-million gallon
waste lagoon. When lagoons like this spill into rivers and lakes as happened
in North Carolina in 1995, the result can be environmentally catastrophic.
© AP Photo / Douglas C. Pizac
According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), livestock
raised for food produce 130 times the excrement of the human population,
some 87,000 pounds per second. The Union of Concerned Scientists points out
that 20 tons of livestock manure is produced annually for every U.S.
household. The much-publicized 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska dumped
12 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound, but the relatively
unknown 1995 New River hog waste spill in North Carolina poured 25 million
gallons of excrement and urine into the water, killing an estimated 10 to 14
million fish and closing 364,000 acres of coastal shellfishing beds. Hog
waste spills have caused the rapid spread of a virulent microbe called
Pfiesteria piscicida, which has killed a billion fish in North Carolina
alone.
More than a third of all raw materials and fossil fuels consumed in the U.S.
are used in animal production. Beef production alone uses more water than is
consumed in growing the nation¹s entire fruit and vegetable crop. Producing
a single hamburger patty uses enough fuel to drive 20 miles and causes the
loss of five times its weight in topsoil. In his book The Food Revolution,
author John Robbins estimates that ³you¹d save more water by not eating a
pound of California beef than you would by not showering for an entire
year.² Because of deforestation to create grazing land, each vegetarian
saves an acre of trees per year.
³We definitely take up more environmental space when we eat meat,² says
Barbara Bramble of the National Wildlife Federation. ³I think it¹s
consistent with environmental values to eat lower on the food chain.²
The Human Health Toll
There is some evidence to suggest that the human digestive system was not
designed for meat consumption and processing (see sidebar), which could help
explain why there is such high incidence of heart disease, hypertension, and
colon and other cancers. Add to this the plethora of drugs and antibiotics
applied as a salve to unnatural factory farming conditions and growing
occurrences of meat-based diseases like E. coli and Salmonella, and there¹s
a compelling health-based case for vegetarianism.
The factory-farmed chicken, cow or pig of today is among the most medicated
creatures on Earth. ³For sheer overprescription, no doctor can touch the
American farmer,² reported Newsweek. According to a Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) report, the use of antimicrobial drugs for
nontherapeutic purposes<mainly to increase factory farm growth rates<has
risen 50 percent since 1985.
Ninety percent of commercially available eggs come from chickens raised on
factory farms, and six billion ³broiler² chickens emerge from the same
conditions. Ninety percent of U.S.-raised pigs are closely confined at some
point during their lives. According to the book Animal Factories by Jim
Mason and Peter Singer, pork producers lose $187 million annually to chronic
diseases such as dysentery, cholera, trichinosis and other ailments fostered
by factory farming. Drugs are used to reduce stress levels in animals
crowded together unnaturally, although 20 percent of the chickens die of
stress or disease anyway.
One result of these conditions is a high rate of meat contamination. Up to
60 percent of chickens sold in supermarkets are infected with Salmonella
entenidis, which can pass to humans if the meat is not heated to a high
enough temperature. Another pathogen, Campylobacter, can also spread from
chickens to human beings with deadly results.
In 1997, more than 25 million pounds of hamburger were found to be
contaminated with E. coli 0157:H7, which is spread by fecal matter. The
bacteria are a particular problem in hamburger, because the grinding process
spreads it throughout the meat. E. coli, the leading cause of kidney failure
in young children, was the culprit when three children died of food
poisoning after eating at a Seattle Jack in the Box restaurant in 1993.
Business as usual at the animal farm: From left: chicken debeaking, cow
confinement, poultry transport and hog crowding.
The British epidemic of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow
disease, which began in 1986 and has affected nearly 200,000 cattle, jumps
to beef-eating humans in the form of the always-fatal Creutzfeldt-Jakob
Disease (CJD). The CDC reports that an average of 10 to 15 people have
contracted CJD from meat in Britain each year since it was first detected in
1994. In 1998, the British Medical Association warned in a report to Members
of Parliament, ³The current state of food safety in Britain is such that all
raw meat should be assumed to be contaminated with pathogenic organisms.² In
1997, it added, Salmonella or E. coli infected a million people in Britain.
BSE spreads through cattle that are fed contaminated central nervous-system
tissue from other animals. ³Its future magnitude and geographic
distributionScannot yet be predicted,² the CDC reported. In the U.S., deer
have been affected with chronic wasting disease, which has many similarities
to British BSE, though a definitive link to humans has not been established.
In the book Eating With Conscience, Dr. Michael W. Fox reports that what is
known as ³animal tankage²<the non-fat animal residue from slaughterhouses<is
used in a wide variety of products, from animal feed and fertilizer to pet
food. Dr. Fox adds that hundreds of cats in Europe (and several zoo animals)
that ate tankage-laced food have contracted forms of BSE. The Japanese
outbreak is believed to have originated in BSE-contaminated feed imported
from Europe.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), more than 10 million
animals that were dying or diseased when slaughtered were ³rendered²
(processed into a protein-rich meal) in 1995 for addition to pig, poultry
and pet food. Animals that collapse at the slaughterhouse door or during
transportation are called ³downers,² and their corpses are routinely
processed for human consumption. A 2001 Zogby America poll conducted for the
group Farm Sanctuary found that 79 percent of Americans oppose this
practice, which could be an entry point for BSE into the U.S. meat supply.
Farm Sanctuary petitioned the USDA in 1998 to end processing of downer meat
for human consumption, but its petition was denied.
Europe will spend billions of dollars bringing a virulent epidemic of yet
another animal-borne disease<foot-and-mouth<under control. In the last two
years, 60 countries have had outbreaks of foot-and-mouth, which kills
animals but does not spread to people.
One of the major western exports is a taste for meat, though it brings with
it increased risk of heart disease and cancer. Clearly, there is something
seriously wrong with a diet and food production system resulting in such
waste, endemic disease and human health threats.
Caring About Animals
The average meat eater is responsible for the deaths of some 2,400 animals
during his or her lifetime. Animals raised for food endure great suffering
in their housing, transport, feeding and slaughter, which is something not
clearly evident in the neatly wrapped packages of meat offered for sale at
grocery counters. Given the information, many Americans<especially those
with an environmental background<recoil at knowing they participate in a
meat production system so oppressive to the animals caught up in it.
The family farm of the nineteenth century, with its ³free-range² animals
running around the farmyard or grazing in a pasture, is largely a thing of
the past. Brutality to animals has become routine in today¹s factory farm. A
recent article in the pig industry journal National Hog Farmer recommends
reducing the average space per animal from eight to six square feet,
concluding ³Crowding pigs pays.² Morley Safer reported on the television
program 60 Minutes that today¹s factory pig is no ³Babe²: ³[They] see no sun
in their limited lives, with no hay to lie on, no mud to roll in. The sows
live in tiny cages, so narrow they cannot even turn around. They live over
metal grates, and their waste is pushed through slats beneath them and
flushed into huge pits.²
Beef cattle are luckier than factory pigs in that they have an average of 14
square feet in the overcrowded feedlots where they live out their lives.
Common procedures for beef calves include branding, castration and
dehorning. Veal calves, taken away from their mothers shortly after birth,
live their entire lives in near darkness, chained by their necks and unable
to move in any direction. They commonly suffer from anemia, diarrhea,
pneumonia and lameness.
Virtually all chickens today are factory raised, with as many as six
egg-laying hens living in a wire-floored ³battery² cage the size of an album
cover. As many as 100,000 birds can live in each ³henhouse.² Conditions are
so psychologically taxing on the birds that they must be debeaked to prevent
pecking injuries. Male chicks born on factory farms<as many as 280 million
per year<are simply thrown into garbage bags to die because they¹re of no
economic value as meat or eggs.
Some 95 percent of factory-raised animals are moved by truck, where they are
typically subjected to overcrowding, severe weather, hunger and thirst. Many
animals die of heat exhaustion or freezing during transport.
Some of the worst abuse occurs at the end of the animals¹ lives, as
documented by Gail Eisnitz¹ book Slaughterhouse, which includes interviews
with slaughterhouse workers. ³On the farm where I work,² reports one
employee, ³they drag the live ones who can¹t stand up anymore out of the
crate. They put a metal snare around her ear or foot and drag her the full
length of the building. These animals are just screaming in pain.² He adds,
³The slaughtering part doesn¹t bother me. It¹s the way they¹re treated when
they¹re alive.² Dying animals unable to walk are tossed into the ³downer
pile,² and many suffer agonies until, after one or two days, they are
finally killed.
The threat to slaughterhouse workers¹ safety is largely underreported or
ignored in the media. For example, Mother Jones magazine, in an otherwise
admirable story on slaughterhouse workers, barely mentions the frequent
injuries caused by pain-wracked animals lashing out inside the
slaughterhouses. Despite the existence of the Humane Slaughter Act and
regular USDA inspection, animals are often skinned alive or<in a major
threat to worker safety<regain consciousness during slaughtering.
The Vegetarian Solution
Vegetarianism is not a new phenomenon. The ancient Greek philosopher
Pythagoras was vegetarian, and until the mid-19th century, people who
abstained from meat were known as ³Pythagoreans.² Famous followers of
Pythagoras¹ diet included Leonardo da Vinci, Benjamin Franklin, George
Bernard Shaw and Albert Einstein. The word ³vegetarian² was coined in 1847
to give a name to what was then a tiny movement in England.
In the U.S., the 1971 publication of Diet For a Small Planet was a major
catalyst for introducing people to a healthy vegetarian diet. Other stimuli
included Peter Singer¹s 1975 book Animal Liberation, which gave
vegetarianism a moral underpinning; Singer and Jim Mason¹s book Animal
Factories, the first expose´ of confinement agriculture; and John Robbins¹
1987 Diet for a New America. In the U.S., according to a 1998 Vegetarian
Journal survey, 82 percent of vegetarians are motivated by health concerns,
75 percent by ethics, the environment and/or animal rights, 31 percent
because of taste and 26 percent because of economics.
Is the vegetarian diet healthy? The common perception persists that removing
meat from the menu is dangerous because of protein loss. Lappé says there is
danger of protein deficiency if vegetarian diets are heavily dependent upon
1) fruit; 2) sweet potatoes or cassava (a staple root crop for more than 500
million people in the tropics); or 3) the particular western problem, junk
food.
But Reed Mangels, nutrition advisor to the Vegetarian Resource Group (VRG),
says vegetarians can meet their protein needs ³easily² if they ³eat a varied
diet and consume enough calories to maintain their weight. It is not
necessary to plan combinations of foods. A mixture of proteins throughout
the day will provide enough Oessential amino acids.¹²
Although meat is rich in protein, Vegetarian and Vegan FAQ reports that
other good sources are potatoes, whole wheat bread, rice, broccoli, spinach,
almonds, peas, chickpeas, peanut butter, tofu (soybean curd), soymilk,
lentils and kale.
Supermarket shelves overflow with soy- or seitan-based meat substitutes. The
soybean contains all eight essential amino acids and exceeds even meat in
the amount of usable protein it can deliver to the human body. (It should be
noted, however, that some people are allergic to soy, and the
³hyper-processing² of some soy-based foods reduces the useful protein
content.) Animal rights advocates also claim that, contrary to the urging of
the meat and dairy industries, humans need to consume only two to 10 percent
of their total calories as protein.
How many vegetarians are there in the U.S.? It depends on whom you ask. A
PETA fact sheet asserts that 12 million Americans are vegetarians, and
19,000 make the switch every week. Pamela Rice, author of 101 Reasons Why
I¹m a Vegetarian, puts the number at 4.5 million, or 2.5 percent of the
population, based on recent surveys. Older counts, from 1992, put the number
of people who ³consider themselves² to be vegetarians at seven percent of
the U.S. population, or an impressive 18 million. A 1991 Gallup Poll
indicated that 20 percent of the population look for vegetarian menu items
when they eat out.
Actual vegetarian numbers may be lower. VRG got virtually the same results
in two separate Roper Polls it sponsored in 1994 and 1997: One percent of
the public, or between two and three million, is vegetarian (eats no meat or
fish, but may eat dairy and/or eggs), with a third to half of them living on
a vegan diet (eschewing all animal products). Roughly five percent in both
studies ³never eat red meat.² A 2000 poll was slightly more optimistic,
putting the number of vegetarians at 2.5 percent of the population. Women
are more likely to be vegetarians than men; and<surprisingly<Republicans are
slightly more likely to abstain from meat than Democrats.
The American Dietetic Association says in a position statement,
³Appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful, are nutritionally
adequate and provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of
certain diseases.² Vegetarians now have excellent opportunities to put
together well-planned meals. The sale of organic products in natural food
stores is the highest growth niche in the food industry, according to
Nutrition Business Journal, and it grew 22 percent in 1999 to $4 billion.
The natural food markets of today are not the tiny storefronts of
yesteryear, but full-service supermarkets, with vigorous competition among
giant national chains. Diverse veggie entrees are now available in most
supermarkets and on a growing list of restaurant menus.
It¹s never been easier to become a vegetarian, and there have never been
more compelling reasons for environmentalists to make that choice. It¹s not
always easy to do<most environmentalists still eat meat<but the tide is
beginning to turn. >> Stay informed about: The Case Against Meat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 04, 2004 Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2004 11:26 pm
Post subject: Re: The Case Against Meat. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
Ray wrote:
> Here you are.
> Never mind the quality feel the width, and it's all true.
>
> Sent to me by an active ARA.
>
>
>
> The Case Against Meat
>
> Evidence Shows that Our Meat-Based Diet is Bad for the Environment,
> Aggravates Global Hunger, Brutalizes Animals and Compromises Our Health
>
>
> by Jim Motavalli
>
> There has never been a better time for environmentalists to become
> vegetarians. Evidence of the environmental impacts of a meat-based diet is
> piling up at the same time its health effects are becoming better known.
> Meanwhile, full-scale industrialized factory farming<which allows diseases
> to spread quickly as animals are raised in close confinement<has given
> rise to recent, highly publicized epidemics of meat-borne illnesses. At
> presstime, the first discovery of mad cow disease in a Tokyo suburb caused
> beef prices to plummet in Japan and many people to stop eating meat.
>
>
> All this comes at a time when meat consumption is reaching an all-time
> high around the world, quadrupling in the last 50 years. There are 20
> billion head of livestock taking up space on the Earth, more than triple
> the number of people. According to the Worldwatch Institute, global
> livestock population has increased 60 percent since 1961, and the number
> of fowl being raised for human dinner tables has nearly quadrupled in the
> same time period, from 4.2 billion to 15.7 billion. U.S. beef and pork
> consumption has tripled since 1970, during which time it has more than
> doubled in Asia.
>
>
> Americans spend $110 billion a year on meat-intensive fast food, and its
> growing popularity around the world may be a factor in dramatic increases
> in global meat consumption.
> © Jason Kremkau
>
>
> One reason for the increase in meat consumption is the rise of fast-food
> restaurants as an American dietary staple. As Eric Schlosser noted in his
> best-selling book Fast Food Nation, ³Americans now spend more money on
> fast food<$110 billion a year<than they do on higher education. They spend
> more on fast food than on movies, books, magazines, newspapers, videos and
> recorded music<combined.²
>
> Strong growth in meat production and consumption continues despite
> mounting evidence that meat-based diets are unhealthy, and that just about
> every aspect of meat production<from grazing-related loss of cropland and
> open space, to the inefficiencies of feeding vast quantities of water and
> grain to cattle in a hungry world, to pollution from ³factory farms²<is an
> environmental disaster with wide and sometimes catastrophic consequences.
> Oregon State University agriculture professor Peter Cheeke calls factory
> farming ³a frontal assault on the environment, with massive groundwater
> and air pollution problems.²
>
> World Hunger and Resources
>
> The 4.8 pounds of grain fed to cattle to produce one pound of beef for
> human beings represents a colossal waste of resources in a world still
> teeming with people who suffer from profound hunger and malnutrition.
>
> According to the British group Vegfam, a 10-acre farm can support 60
> people growing soybeans, 24 people growing wheat, 10 people growing corn
> and only two producing cattle. Britain<with 56 million people<could
> support a population of 250 million on an all-vegetable diet. Because 90
> percent of U.S. and European meat eaters¹ grain consumption is indirect
> (first being fed to animals), westerners each consume 2,000 pounds of
> grain a year. Most grain in underdeveloped countries is consumed directly.
>
>
> Somalian famine victims line up for food handouts. Producing a pound of
> beef requires 4.8 pounds of grain, and critics of our modern agricultural
> system say that the spread of meat-based diets aggravates world hunger.
> © David & Peter Turnley / Corbis
>
>
> While it is true that many animals graze on land that would be unsuitable
> for cultivation, the demand for meat has taken millions of productive
> acres away from farm inventories. The cost of that is incalculable. As
> Diet For a Small Planet author Frances Moore Lappé writes, imagine sitting
> down to an eight-ounce steak. ³Then imagine the room filled with 45 to 50
> people with empty bowls in front of them. For the Ofeed cost¹ of your
> steak, each of their bowls could be filled with a full cup of cooked
> cereal grains.²
>
> Harvard nutritionist Jean Mayer estimates that reducing meat production by
> just 10 percent in the U.S. would free enough grain to feed 60 million
> people. Authors Paul and Anne Ehrlich note that a pound of wheat can be
> grown with 60 pounds of water, whereas a pound of meat requires 2,500 to
> 6,000 pounds.
>
> Environmental Costs
>
> Energy-intensive U.S. factory farms generated 1.4 billion tons of animal
> waste in 1996, which, the Environmental Protection Agency reports,
> pollutes American waterways more than all other industrial sources
> combined. Meat production has also been linked to severe erosion of
> billions of acres of once-productive farmland and to the destruction of
> rainforests.
>
> McDonald¹s took a group of British animal rights activists to court in the
> 1990s because they had linked the fast food giant to an unhealthy diet and
> rainforest destruction. The defendants, who fought the company to a
> standstill, made a convincing case. In court documents, the activists
> asserted, ³From 1970 onwards, beef from cattle reared on ex-rainforest
> land was supplied to McDonald¹s.² In a policy statement, McDonald¹s claims
> that it ³does not purchase beef which threatens tropical rainforests
> anywhere in the world,² but it does not deny past purchases.
>
>
> Circle Four Farms, a Utah-based pork producer, hosts a three-million
> gallon waste lagoon. When lagoons like this spill into rivers and lakes as
> happened in North Carolina in 1995, the result can be environmentally
> catastrophic. © AP Photo / Douglas C. Pizac
>
>
> According to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), livestock
> raised for food produce 130 times the excrement of the human population,
> some 87,000 pounds per second. The Union of Concerned Scientists points
> out that 20 tons of livestock manure is produced annually for every U.S.
> household. The much-publicized 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska
> dumped 12 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound, but the
> relatively unknown 1995 New River hog waste spill in North Carolina poured
> 25 million gallons of excrement and urine into the water, killing an
> estimated 10 to 14 million fish and closing 364,000 acres of coastal
> shellfishing beds. Hog waste spills have caused the rapid spread of a
> virulent microbe called Pfiesteria piscicida, which has killed a billion
> fish in North Carolina alone.
>
> More than a third of all raw materials and fossil fuels consumed in the
> U.S. are used in animal production. Beef production alone uses more water
> than is consumed in growing the nation¹s entire fruit and vegetable crop.
> Producing a single hamburger patty uses enough fuel to drive 20 miles and
> causes the loss of five times its weight in topsoil. In his book The Food
> Revolution, author John Robbins estimates that ³you¹d save more water by
> not eating a pound of California beef than you would by not showering for
> an entire year.² Because of deforestation to create grazing land, each
> vegetarian saves an acre of trees per year.
>
> ³We definitely take up more environmental space when we eat meat,² says
> Barbara Bramble of the National Wildlife Federation. ³I think it¹s
> consistent with environmental values to eat lower on the food chain.²
>
> The Human Health Toll
>
> There is some evidence to suggest that the human digestive system was not
> designed for meat consumption and processing (see sidebar), which could
> help explain why there is such high incidence of heart disease,
> hypertension, and colon and other cancers. Add to this the plethora of
> drugs and antibiotics applied as a salve to unnatural factory farming
> conditions and growing occurrences of meat-based diseases like E. coli and
> Salmonella, and there¹s a compelling health-based case for vegetarianism.
>
> The factory-farmed chicken, cow or pig of today is among the most
> medicated creatures on Earth. ³For sheer overprescription, no doctor can
> touch the American farmer,² reported Newsweek. According to a Centers for
> Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report, the use of antimicrobial
> drugs for nontherapeutic purposes<mainly to increase factory farm growth
> rates<has risen 50 percent since 1985.
>
> Ninety percent of commercially available eggs come from chickens raised on
> factory farms, and six billion ³broiler² chickens emerge from the same
> conditions. Ninety percent of U.S.-raised pigs are closely confined at
> some point during their lives. According to the book Animal Factories by
> Jim Mason and Peter Singer, pork producers lose $187 million annually to
> chronic diseases such as dysentery, cholera, trichinosis and other
> ailments fostered by factory farming. Drugs are used to reduce stress
> levels in animals crowded together unnaturally, although 20 percent of the
> chickens die of stress or disease anyway.
>
> One result of these conditions is a high rate of meat contamination. Up to
> 60 percent of chickens sold in supermarkets are infected with Salmonella
> entenidis, which can pass to humans if the meat is not heated to a high
> enough temperature. Another pathogen, Campylobacter, can also spread from
> chickens to human beings with deadly results.
>
> In 1997, more than 25 million pounds of hamburger were found to be
> contaminated with E. coli 0157:H7, which is spread by fecal matter. The
> bacteria are a particular problem in hamburger, because the grinding
> process spreads it throughout the meat. E. coli, the leading cause of
> kidney failure in young children, was the culprit when three children died
> of food poisoning after eating at a Seattle Jack in the Box restaurant in
> 1993.
>
>
> Business as usual at the animal farm: From left: chicken debeaking, cow
> confinement, poultry transport and hog crowding.
>
>
> The British epidemic of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), or mad cow
> disease, which began in 1986 and has affected nearly 200,000 cattle, jumps
> to beef-eating humans in the form of the always-fatal Creutzfeldt-Jakob
> Disease (CJD). The CDC reports that an average of 10 to 15 people have
> contracted CJD from meat in Britain each year since it was first detected
> in 1994. In 1998, the British Medical Association warned in a report to
> Members of Parliament, ³The current state of food safety in Britain is
> such that all raw meat should be assumed to be contaminated with
> pathogenic organisms.² In 1997, it added, Salmonella or E. coli infected a
> million people in Britain. BSE spreads through cattle that are fed
> contaminated central nervous-system tissue from other animals. ³Its future
> magnitude and geographic distributionScannot yet be predicted,² the CDC
> reported. In the U.S., deer have been affected with chronic wasting
> disease, which has many similarities to British BSE, though a definitive
> link to humans has not been established.
>
> In the book Eating With Conscience, Dr. Michael W. Fox reports that what
> is known as ³animal tankage²<the non-fat animal residue from
> slaughterhouses<is used in a wide variety of products, from animal feed
> and fertilizer to pet food. Dr. Fox adds that hundreds of cats in Europe
> (and several zoo animals) that ate tankage-laced food have contracted
> forms of BSE. The Japanese outbreak is believed to have originated in
> BSE-contaminated feed imported from Europe.
>
> According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), more than 10
> million animals that were dying or diseased when slaughtered were
> ³rendered² (processed into a protein-rich meal) in 1995 for addition to
> pig, poultry and pet food. Animals that collapse at the slaughterhouse
> door or during transportation are called ³downers,² and their corpses are
> routinely processed for human consumption. A 2001 Zogby America poll
> conducted for the group Farm Sanctuary found that 79 percent of Americans
> oppose this practice, which could be an entry point for BSE into the U.S.
> meat supply. Farm Sanctuary petitioned the USDA in 1998 to end processing
> of downer meat for human consumption, but its petition was denied.
>
> Europe will spend billions of dollars bringing a virulent epidemic of yet
> another animal-borne disease<foot-and-mouth<under control. In the last two
> years, 60 countries have had outbreaks of foot-and-mouth, which kills
> animals but does not spread to people.
>
> One of the major western exports is a taste for meat, though it brings
> with it increased risk of heart disease and cancer. Clearly, there is
> something seriously wrong with a diet and food production system resulting
> in such waste, endemic disease and human health threats.
>
> Caring About Animals
>
> The average meat eater is responsible for the deaths of some 2,400 animals
> during his or her lifetime. Animals raised for food endure great suffering
> in their housing, transport, feeding and slaughter, which is something not
> clearly evident in the neatly wrapped packages of meat offered for sale at
> grocery counters. Given the information, many Americans<especially those
> with an environmental background<recoil at knowing they participate in a
> meat production system so oppressive to the animals caught up in it.
>
> The family farm of the nineteenth century, with its ³free-range² animals
> running around the farmyard or grazing in a pasture, is largely a thing of
> the past. Brutality to animals has become routine in today¹s factory farm.
> A recent article in the pig industry journal National Hog Farmer
> recommends reducing the average space per animal from eight to six square
> feet, concluding ³Crowding pigs pays.² Morley Safer reported on the
> television program 60 Minutes that today¹s factory pig is no ³Babe²:
> ³[They] see no sun in their limited lives, with no hay to lie on, no mud
> to roll in. The sows live in tiny cages, so narrow they cannot even turn
> around. They live over metal grates, and their waste is pushed through
> slats beneath them and flushed into huge pits.²
>
> Beef cattle are luckier than factory pigs in that they have an average of
> 14 square feet in the overcrowded feedlots where they live out their
> lives. Common procedures for beef calves include branding, castration and
> dehorning. Veal calves, taken away from their mothers shortly after birth,
> live their entire lives in near darkness, chained by their necks and
> unable to move in any direction. They commonly suffer from anemia,
> diarrhea, pneumonia and lameness.
>
> Virtually all chickens today are factory raised, with as many as six
> egg-laying hens living in a wire-floored ³battery² cage the size of an
> album cover. As many as 100,000 birds can live in each ³henhouse.²
> Conditions are so psychologically taxing on the birds that they must be
> debeaked to prevent pecking injuries. Male chicks born on factory farms<as
> many as 280 million per year<are simply thrown into garbage bags to die
> because they¹re of no economic value as meat or eggs.
>
> Some 95 percent of factory-raised animals are moved by truck, where they
> are typically subjected to overcrowding, severe weather, hunger and
> thirst. Many animals die of heat exhaustion or freezing during transport.
>
> Some of the worst abuse occurs at the end of the animals¹ lives, as
> documented by Gail Eisnitz¹ book Slaughterhouse, which includes interviews
> with slaughterhouse workers. ³On the farm where I work,² reports one
> employee, ³they drag the live ones who can¹t stand up anymore out of the
> crate. They put a metal snare around her ear or foot and drag her the full
> length of the building. These animals are just screaming in pain.² He
> adds, ³The slaughtering part doesn¹t bother me. It¹s the way they¹re
> treated when they¹re alive.² Dying animals unable to walk are tossed into
> the ³downer pile,² and many suffer agonies until, after one or two days,
> they are finally killed.
>
> The threat to slaughterhouse workers¹ safety is largely underreported or
> ignored in the media. For example, Mother Jones magazine, in an otherwise
> admirable story on slaughterhouse workers, barely mentions the frequent
> injuries caused by pain-wracked animals lashing out inside the
> slaughterhouses. Despite the existence of the Humane Slaughter Act and
> regular USDA inspection, animals are often skinned alive or<in a major
> threat to worker safety<regain consciousness during slaughtering.
>
> The Vegetarian Solution
>
> Vegetarianism is not a new phenomenon. The ancient Greek philosopher
> Pythagoras was vegetarian, and until the mid-19th century, people who
> abstained from meat were known as ³Pythagoreans.² Famous followers of
> Pythagoras¹ diet included Leonardo da Vinci, Benjamin Franklin, George
> Bernard Shaw and Albert Einstein. The word ³vegetarian² was coined in 1847
> to give a name to what was then a tiny movement in England.
>
> In the U.S., the 1971 publication of Diet For a Small Planet was a major
> catalyst for introducing people to a healthy vegetarian diet. Other
> stimuli included Peter Singer¹s 1975 book Animal Liberation, which gave
> vegetarianism a moral underpinning; Singer and Jim Mason¹s book Animal
> Factories, the first expose´ of confinement agriculture; and John Robbins¹
> 1987 Diet for a New America. In the U.S., according to a 1998 Vegetarian
> Journal survey, 82 percent of vegetarians are motivated by health
> concerns, 75 percent by ethics, the environment and/or animal rights, 31
> percent because of taste and 26 percent because of economics.
>
> Is the vegetarian diet healthy? The common perception persists that
> removing meat from the menu is dangerous because of protein loss. Lappé
> says there is danger of protein deficiency if vegetarian diets are heavily
> dependent upon 1) fruit; 2) sweet potatoes or cassava (a staple root crop
> for more than 500 million people in the tropics); or 3) the particular
> western problem, junk food.
>
> But Reed Mangels, nutrition advisor to the Vegetarian Resource Group
> (VRG), says vegetarians can meet their protein needs ³easily² if they ³eat
> a varied diet and consume enough calories to maintain their weight. It is
> not necessary to plan combinations of foods. A mixture of proteins
> throughout the day will provide enough Oessential amino acids.¹²
>
> Although meat is rich in protein, Vegetarian and Vegan FAQ reports that
> other good sources are potatoes, whole wheat bread, rice, broccoli,
> spinach, almonds, peas, chickpeas, peanut butter, tofu (soybean curd),
> soymilk, lentils and kale.
>
> Supermarket shelves overflow with soy- or seitan-based meat substitutes.
> The soybean contains all eight essential amino acids and exceeds even meat
> in the amount of usable protein it can deliver to the human body. (It
> should be noted, however, that some people are allergic to soy, and the
> ³hyper-processing² of some soy-based foods reduces the useful protein
> content.) Animal rights advocates also claim that, contrary to the urging
> of the meat and dairy industries, humans need to consume only two to 10
> percent of their total calories as protein.
>
> How many vegetarians are there in the U.S.? It depends on whom you ask. A
> PETA fact sheet asserts that 12 million Americans are vegetarians, and
> 19,000 make the switch every week. Pamela Rice, author of 101 Reasons Why
> I¹m a Vegetarian, puts the number at 4.5 million, or 2.5 percent of the
> population, based on recent surveys. Older counts, from 1992, put the
> number of people who ³consider themselves² to be vegetarians at seven
> percent of the U.S. population, or an impressive 18 million. A 1991 Gallup
> Poll indicated that 20 percent of the population look for vegetarian menu
> items when they eat out.
>
> Actual vegetarian numbers may be lower. VRG got virtually the same results
> in two separate Roper Polls it sponsored in 1994 and 1997: One percent of
> the public, or between two and three million, is vegetarian (eats no meat
> or fish, but may eat dairy and/or eggs), with a third to half of them
> living on a vegan diet (eschewing all animal products). Roughly five
> percent in both studies ³never eat red meat.² A 2000 poll was slightly
> more optimistic, putting the number of vegetarians at 2.5 percent of the
> population. Women are more likely to be vegetarians than men;
> and<surprisingly<Republicans are slightly more likely to abstain from meat
> than Democrats.
>
> The American Dietetic Association says in a position statement,
> ³Appropriately planned vegetarian diets are healthful, are nutritionally
> adequate and provide health benefits in the prevention and treatment of
> certain diseases.² Vegetarians now have excellent opportunities to put
> together well-planned meals. The sale of organic products in natural food
> stores is the highest growth niche in the food industry, according to
> Nutrition Business Journal, and it grew 22 percent in 1999 to $4 billion.
> The natural food markets of today are not the tiny storefronts of
> yesteryear, but full-service supermarkets, with vigorous competition among
> giant national chains. Diverse veggie entrees are now available in most
> supermarkets and on a growing list of restaurant menus.
>
> It¹s never been easier to become a vegetarian, and there have never been
> more compelling reasons for environmentalists to make that choice. It¹s
> not always easy to do<most environmentalists still eat meat<but the tide
> is beginning to turn.
Shut up you little tree hugging terrorist. All those pesticides out there
negate every point you have. You peta loons kill more animals than hunters
to.
--
Known Pinheads:
Archie Leach, Fox Mulder, Ken Pangborn, Earl Something, The space boss,
Brandon Hex, Mike SIgman, Richard Bullis, Allan Connor, Joey Bartload,
Eddie Wollman, Dan Kettler, Viv Eshwar and Doctor Jai, FArris Jarwad,
Twonky and so many others, even you, Ray. >> Stay informed about: The Case Against Meat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 18, 2004 Posts: 163
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 12:04 am
Post subject: Re: The Case Against Meat. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ray" <ray.TakeThisOut@syntex.com> wrote in message
news:cchp08$c58$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> Here you are.
> Never mind the quality feel the width, and it's all true.
No, it's not. Typical that your simple mindedness would believe it though,
killer.
snippage.... >> Stay informed about: The Case Against Meat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 18, 2004 Posts: 184
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 3:44 pm
Post subject: Re: The Case Against Meat. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"rick etter" <stop DeleteThis @stop.net> wrote in message
news:xc0Hc.8861$oD3.8536@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Ray" <ray DeleteThis @syntex.com> wrote in message
> news:cchp08$c58$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> > Here you are.
> > Never mind the quality feel the width, and it's all true.
>
>
>
> No, it's not. Typical that your simple mindedness would believe it
though,
> killer.
>
>
>
> snippage....
>
>
Come on Rick, tell us what you do for a living?
Has to be connected with the meat industry.
Now which part of the message do you find untrue? >> Stay informed about: The Case Against Meat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 18, 2004 Posts: 163
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2004 8:43 pm
Post subject: Re: The Case Against Meat. [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ray" <ray.DeleteThis@syntex.com> wrote in message
news:ccjq4n$dbb$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
>
> "rick etter" <stop.DeleteThis@stop.net> wrote in message
> news:xc0Hc.8861$oD3.8536@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> > "Ray" <ray.DeleteThis@syntex.com> wrote in message
> > news:cchp08$c58$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
> > > Here you are.
> > > Never mind the quality feel the width, and it's all true.
> >
> >
> >
> > No, it's not. Typical that your simple mindedness would believe it
> though,
> > killer.
> >
> >
> >
> > snippage....
> >
> >
> Come on Rick, tell us what you do for a living?
>
> Has to be connected with the meat industry.
>
> Now which part of the message do you find untrue?
> =====================
Nope. All I have to do with meat is to pick out the cow I want and to eat
it.
Try all of it, fool. The very first statement is false. Mono-culture
crop production is far more damaging than some meat-included diets. Like
all vegan propagandists, you and he state out with a simple idea for your
simple minds, and try to make it true. Problem for youis that it doesn't
work, killer.
> >> Stay informed about: The Case Against Meat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|