Welcome to PetForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-..

 
   Pet Problems (Home) -> Animals Rights RSS
Related Topics:
The long-awaited Third Reading of the Government's Hunting.. - Dear The Third Reading of the Hunting Bill has been announced for 30th June. This is a critical vote for the future of hunting with dogs. The Hunting Bill, bans deer hunting, hare coursing and hare..

RUDDY DUCK SECRET REVEALED-Government excuses shot down (I.. - The power of the press, isn't it great, a word in the right ear...lol The RSPB steam rollered through the ruddy duck slaughter campaign, in a grant laden cash fest free for all exceeding five million..

Why Organic is King. The public shun fat, lazy farming pra.. - For years British farmers have gotten fat on subsidies and easy street, they pumped our produce full of and without a care for anybody but The public is slowly waking up. Viva Organic. This is why we must fight the GM..

CONservation hooligans at work, selling off land bequethed.. - Concern over Trust's land sale Jul 1 2003 by Rhodri Clark, The Western Mail PLANS by the National Trust to sell some of its land to housing have rekindled the fears of objectors who fought off a similar proposal in the 1990s. In 1997,..

RSPB spend 6,000guineas in public donations, to buy bull f.. - Did you know the RSPB produce and sell meat and Is this what we give our donations for? Did you know RSPB are also partners with many groups, who provide sport shooting to the hoity toity? On Islay it owns the 2000 hectare..
Next:  Animals Rights: Dog slaying in china  
Author Message
George

External


Since: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 12:10 pm
Post subject: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-Industry Stance
Archived from groups: alt>animals>ethics>vegetarian, others (more info?)

Still, after the fiasco of F&M, BSE we pander to the very industry
that is causing these serious global threats to mankind.

Stop molly coddling lazy, fat, selfish farmers.



http://www.animalaid.org.uk/press/0605bflu.htm

Home > Press office > Press release: 08.05.06

Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-Industry
Stance
Animal Aid is demanding answers of the government as to why
information issued about bird flu appears to be aimed at protecting
the poultry industry, rather than the public's health. While assuring
the public that properly cooked chicken is safe to consume, there is a
conspicuous silence about the safety of handling raw and possibly
infected carcasses. The national campaign group's demand comes in the
wake of the announcement that the government has drawn up plans to
suffocate birds to death through "ventilation shutdown" in factory
farm sheds.

In America, citizens are given very different information and advice
from their government. Amid fears of Avian Influenza (AI) arriving in
America, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has issued
clear guidelines about handling raw poultry products. (1) These
include using bleach to sanitise cutting boards and separating raw
meats from all other foods. The USDA further states that the AI virus
can be transferred on the surfaces of eggshells. The British
government has issued no such warning.

Dodging this issue compounds the health risks created by refusing to
acknowledge publicly the route by which AI spreads - through intensive
farming practices and the worldwide trade in poultry products. While
industry and government spokespeople in Britain are quick to blame
wild birds, the USDA states that 'The spread of avian influenza
between poultry premises almost always follows the movement of
contaminated people and equipment.' The global spread of AI similarly
appears to follow rail and road paths more closely than wild bird
migratory routes, indicating human activity as the principle means of
spreading this disease.

The low pathogenicity forms of AI are common in wild birds, producing
only mild symptoms. However, on entering poultry farms - often filthy
and overcrowded, and housing stressed birds with a diminished immune
response - the virus can and often does mutate to higher virulence.(2)
At this stage, the disease represents a real threat to the health of
birds and people.

Says Animal Aid Campaigner Kate Fowler-Reeves:
'The blithe message touted by government and industry spokespeople
that poultry is safe to eat is reminiscent of John Gummer's
light-hearted approach to the risks posed by British beef. Can chicken
be safe when the US government issues guidelines on how to rid it of
lethal viruses and dangerous bacteria? By refusing to acknowledge
publicly both the potential risks of handling infected carcasses and
the source and transmission routes of the highly virulent bird flu
strains, the government is sending the message that it cares more
about protecting trade than safeguarding the nation's health.'

Bird Flu factfile

Press releases:

Avian flu: call for immediate halt to importation, breeding and
release of game birds
Avian flu - Defra must resist hysteria-led bird massacre

..........................

Notes to Editors

100,000 chickens die every day inside British factory farming sheds.
The cause of death is not routinely investigated or recorded.(3)
For more information, contact Andrew Tyler or Kate Fowler-Reeves on
01732 364 546.
Full background can be found on Animal Aid's fact sheet, "Bird Flu: A
Disease of the Intensive Poultry Industry."
We have ISDN line for broadcast quality interviews.
Reference

Fact sheet No. 0458.05 Questions & Answers: Avian Influenza
Dr Martin Williams, letter to The Independent, 25/4/06
Caroline Le Sueur, senior scientific officer at the RSPCA

Top ^



www.animalaid.org.uk | site map | about us |

Animal Aid campaigns peacefully against all animal abuse, and
promotes a cruelty-free lifestyle. You can support our work by
joining, making a donation, or using our online shop. Contact Animal
Aid at The Old Chapel, Bradford Street, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1AW, UK,
tel +44 (0)1732 364546, fax +44 (0)1732 366533, email
info DeleteThis @animalaid.org.uk

 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Baal

External


Since: May 09, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 9:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-Industry Stance [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

At this stage, the disease represents a real threat to the health of
birds and people.


That depends of the virus strain.

Avian Influenza (Bird Flu)
Avian influenza in birds
Avian influenza is an infection caused by avian (bird) influenza (flu)
viruses. These influenza viruses occur naturally among birds. Wild birds
worldwide carry the viruses in their intestines, but usually do not get sick
from them. However, avian influenza is very contagious among birds and can
make some domesticated birds, including chickens, ducks, and turkeys, very
sick and kill them.

Infected birds shed influenza virus in their saliva, nasal secretions, and
faces. Susceptible birds become infected when they have contact with
contaminated secretions or excretions or with surfaces that are contaminated
with secretions or excretions from infected birds. Domesticated birds may
become infected with avian influenza virus through direct contact with
infected waterfowl or other infected poultry, or through contact with
surfaces (such as dirt or cages) or materials (such as water or feed) that
have been contaminated with the virus.

Infection with avian influenza viruses in domestic poultry causes two main
forms of disease that are distinguished by low and high extremes of
virulence. The "low pathogenic" form may go undetected and usually causes
only mild symptoms (such as ruffled feathers and a drop in egg production).
However, the highly pathogenic form spreads more rapidly through flocks of
poultry. This form may cause disease that affects multiple internal organs
and has a mortality rate that can reach 90-100% often within 48 hours.

Human infection with avian influenza viruses
There are many different subtypes of type A influenza viruses. These
subtypes differ because of changes in certain proteins on the surface of the
influenza A virus (haemagglutinin [HA] and neuraminidase [NA] proteins).
There are 16 known HA subtypes and 9 known NA subtypes of influenza A
viruses. Many different combinations of HA and NA proteins are possible.
Each combination represents a different subtype. All known subtypes of
influenza A viruses can be found in birds.

Usually, "avian influenza virus" refers to influenza A viruses found chiefly
in birds, but infections with these viruses can occur in humans. The risk
from avian influenza is generally low to most people, because the viruses do
not usually infect humans. However, confirmed cases of human infection from
several subtypes of avian influenza infection have been reported since 1997.
Most cases of avian influenza infection in humans have resulted from contact
with infected poultry (e.g., domesticated chicken, ducks, and turkeys) or
surfaces contaminated with secretion/excretions from infected birds. The
spread of avian influenza viruses from one ill person to another has been
reported very rarely, and transmission has not been observed to continue
beyond one person.

"Human influenza virus" usually refers to those subtypes that spread widely
among humans. There are only three known A subtypes of influenza viruses
(H1N1, H1N2, and H3N2) currently circulating among humans. It is likely that
some genetic parts of current human influenza A viruses came from birds
originally. Influenza A viruses are constantly changing, and they might
adapt over time to infect and spread among humans.

During an outbreak of avian influenza among poultry, there is a possible
risk to people who have contact with infected birds or surfaces that have
been contaminated with secretions or excretions from infected birds.

Symptoms of avian influenza in humans have ranged from typical human
influenza-like symptoms (e.g., fever, cough, sore throat, and muscle aches)
to eye infections, pneumonia, severe respiratory diseases (such as acute
respiratory distress), and other severe and life-threatening complications.
The symptoms of avian influenza may depend on which virus caused the
infection.

Studies done in laboratories suggest that some of the prescription medicines
approved in the United States for human influenza viruses should work in
treating avian influenza infection in humans. However, influenza viruses can
become resistant to these drugs, so these medications may not always work.
Additional studies are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of these
medicines.

Avian Influenza A (H5N1)
Influenza A (H5N1) virus - also called "H5N1 virus" - is an influenza A
virus subtype that occurs mainly in birds, is highly contagious among birds,
and can be deadly to them. H5N1 virus does not usually infect people, but
infections with these viruses have occurred in humans. Most of these cases
have resulted from people having direct or close contact with H5N1-infected
poultry or H5N1-contaminated surfaces.

Avian influenza A (H5N1) outbreaks
For current information about avian influenza A (H5N1) outbreaks, see our
Outbreaks page.

Human health risks during the H5N1 outbreak
Of the few avian influenza viruses that have crossed the species barrier to
infect humans, H5N1 has caused the largest number of detected cases of
severe disease and death in humans. In the current outbreaks in Asia and
Europe more than half of those infected with the virus have died. Most cases
have occurred in previously healthy children and young adults. However, it
is possible that the only cases currently being reported are those in the
most severely ill people, and that the full range of illness caused by the
H5N1 virus has not yet been defined. For the most current information about
avian influenza and cumulative case numbers, see the World Health
Organization (WHO) avian influenza website.

So far, the spread of H5N1 virus from person to person has been limited and
has not continued beyond one person. Nonetheless, because all influenza
viruses have the ability to change, scientists are concerned that H5N1 virus
one day could be able to infect humans and spread easily from one person to
another. Because these viruses do not commonly infect humans, there is
little or no immune protection against them in the human population. If H5N1
virus were to gain the capacity to spread easily from person to person, an
influenza pandemic (worldwide outbreak of disease) could begin. For more
information about influenza pandemics, see PandemicFlu.gov.

No one can predict when a pandemic might occur. However, experts from around
the world are watching the H5N1 situation in Asia and Europe very closely
and are preparing for the possibility that the virus may begin to spread
more easily and widely from person to person.

Treatment and vaccination for H5N1 virus in humans
The H5N1 virus that has caused human illness and death in Asia is resistant
to amantadine and rimantadine, two antiviral medications commonly used for
influenza. Two other antiviral medications, oseltamavir and zanamavir, would
probably work to treat influenza caused by H5N1 virus, but additional
studies still need to be done to demonstrate their effectiveness.

There currently is no commercially available vaccine to protect humans
against H5N1 virus that is being seen in Asia and Europe. However, vaccine
development efforts are taking place. Research studies to test a vaccine to
protect humans against H5N1 virus began in April 2005, and a series of
clinical trials is under way. For more information about H5N1 vaccine
development process, visit the National Institutes of Health website.




--
I smile and go off waving
(Amiably) - for that's my way

Baal

http://www.helden.org.uk
"George" <george12za.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:446078b9$0$74023$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
Still, after the fiasco of F&M, BSE we pander to the very industry
that is causing these serious global threats to mankind.

Stop molly coddling lazy, fat, selfish farmers.



http://www.animalaid.org.uk/press/0605bflu.htm

Home > Press office > Press release: 08.05.06

Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-Industry
Stance
Animal Aid is demanding answers of the government as to why
information issued about bird flu appears to be aimed at protecting
the poultry industry, rather than the public's health. While assuring
the public that properly cooked chicken is safe to consume, there is a
conspicuous silence about the safety of handling raw and possibly
infected carcasses. The national campaign group's demand comes in the
wake of the announcement that the government has drawn up plans to
suffocate birds to death through "ventilation shutdown" in factory
farm sheds.

In America, citizens are given very different information and advice
from their government. Amid fears of Avian Influenza (AI) arriving in
America, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has issued
clear guidelines about handling raw poultry products. (1) These
include using bleach to sanitise cutting boards and separating raw
meats from all other foods. The USDA further states that the AI virus
can be transferred on the surfaces of eggshells. The British
government has issued no such warning.

Dodging this issue compounds the health risks created by refusing to
acknowledge publicly the route by which AI spreads - through intensive
farming practices and the worldwide trade in poultry products. While
industry and government spokespeople in Britain are quick to blame
wild birds, the USDA states that 'The spread of avian influenza
between poultry premises almost always follows the movement of
contaminated people and equipment.' The global spread of AI similarly
appears to follow rail and road paths more closely than wild bird
migratory routes, indicating human activity as the principle means of
spreading this disease.

The low pathogenicity forms of AI are common in wild birds, producing
only mild symptoms. However, on entering poultry farms - often filthy
and overcrowded, and housing stressed birds with a diminished immune
response - the virus can and often does mutate to higher virulence.(2)
At this stage, the disease represents a real threat to the health of
birds and people.

Says Animal Aid Campaigner Kate Fowler-Reeves:
'The blithe message touted by government and industry spokespeople
that poultry is safe to eat is reminiscent of John Gummer's
light-hearted approach to the risks posed by British beef. Can chicken
be safe when the US government issues guidelines on how to rid it of
lethal viruses and dangerous bacteria? By refusing to acknowledge
publicly both the potential risks of handling infected carcasses and
the source and transmission routes of the highly virulent bird flu
strains, the government is sending the message that it cares more
about protecting trade than safeguarding the nation's health.'

Bird Flu factfile

Press releases:

Avian flu: call for immediate halt to importation, breeding and
release of game birds
Avian flu - Defra must resist hysteria-led bird massacre

..........................

Notes to Editors

100,000 chickens die every day inside British factory farming sheds.
The cause of death is not routinely investigated or recorded.(3)
For more information, contact Andrew Tyler or Kate Fowler-Reeves on
01732 364 546.
Full background can be found on Animal Aid's fact sheet, "Bird Flu: A
Disease of the Intensive Poultry Industry."
We have ISDN line for broadcast quality interviews.
Reference

Fact sheet No. 0458.05 Questions & Answers: Avian Influenza
Dr Martin Williams, letter to The Independent, 25/4/06
Caroline Le Sueur, senior scientific officer at the RSPCA

Top ^



www.animalaid.org.uk | site map | about us |

Animal Aid campaigns peacefully against all animal abuse, and
promotes a cruelty-free lifestyle. You can support our work by
joining, making a donation, or using our online shop. Contact Animal
Aid at The Old Chapel, Bradford Street, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1AW, UK,
tel +44 (0)1732 364546, fax +44 (0)1732 366533, email
info.TakeThisOut@animalaid.org.uk




*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***

 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ptarmigan

External


Since: May 10, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed May 10, 2006 4:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-Industry Stance [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
George

External


Since: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 1:40 pm
Post subject: New NHS funded study shows up animal testing shambles [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I see Animal Aid have been busy as ever.

It's important we don't let the pro animal abuse loons take over the
helm trying to keep this covered up.


http://www.animalaid.org.uk/

New NHS funded study shows up animal testing shambles
A just released survey of animal research funded by the NHS provides
damning evidence - says national campaign group Animal Aid - that
animal experiments aren't just cruel, they don't appear to work. The
report (see link below) shows that:

animal researchers don't talk to hospital doctors about their work
clinical trials with human patients get underway even before the
animal research is completed
drugs that fail in animals are used in humans anyway
a drug that increased overall mortality in animals was, nonetheless,
used in people
most of the animal research that was analysed was poorly conducted and
gave conflicting results
The survey compared the clinical (i.e. human) outcome of six medical
treatments with the results obtained from experiments on animals. The
areas of research related to head injuries, blood clotting, stroke,
disease in premature babies and osteoporosis. Each of the six topics
was analysed by systematic review. A systematic review is 'a summary
of the medical literature that uses explicit methods to perform a
thorough literature search and critical appraisal of individual
studies and that uses appropriate statistical techniques to combine
these valid studies'. In other words, systematic reviews normally
represent the best available data.

One systematic review looked at the use of steroids in treating people
with severe head injuries. The NHS study showed that, whereas the
animal experiments had provided mixed results, the drug clearly
increased the risk of death in patients and had to be discontinued.

Two other studies examined the effect of new drugs for the treatment
of stroke. In both cases, the animal experiments showed that the drug
improved the animals' condition after being deliberately brain
damaged. In human patients, however, the drugs increased the risk of
death, and one of them increased the risk of disability.

Yet another systematic review looked at what effects steroids - given
to pregnant animals - would have on the unborn. The aim of the
experiments was to see whether the drug, given to pregnant women,
could reduce the risk of mortality in premature babies whose lungs had
not yet fully developed. Experiments conducted on monkeys, cattle and
rabbits showed the drug treatment to have a positive effect on the
lungs of the unborn. This outcome was also seen in the offspring of
pregnant women. However, while the drug increased the risk of death in
the unborn animals, it did not produce the same disastrous
consequences in the developing human foetus.

Says Andre Menache MRCVS, Scientific Consultant to Animal Aid:
'This high-quality survey is very significant in the debate about
whether or not animal experiments have any relevance to human
medicine. The answer provided by this NHS-commissioned report is that,
across a range of important human ailments, animal research provides
misleading and conflicting information and is therefore dangerously
unreliable.'

..........................

Notes to Editors

For more information contact Andre Menache on 01732 364546
View the full report. http://tinyurl.com/mzk2w




www.animalaid.org.uk | site map | about us |

Animal Aid campaigns peacefully against all animal abuse, and
promotes a cruelty-free lifestyle. You can support our work by
joining, making a donation, or using our online shop. Contact Animal
Aid at The Old Chapel, Bradford Street, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1AW, UK,
tel +44 (0)1732 364546, fax +44 (0)1732 366533, email
info.DeleteThis@animalaid.org.uk
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Halmyre

External


Since: Jun 08, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:45 pm
Post subject: Re: New NHS funded study shows up animal testing shambles [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

George wrote:
> I see Animal Aid have been busy as ever.
>
> It's important we don't let the pro animal abuse loons take over the
> helm trying to keep this covered up.
>
>

Dug up anyone's grandmother lately?

--
Halmyre

ceci, n'est pas un signature
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
amacmil304

External


Since: Feb 20, 2005
Posts: 46



(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 11:45 pm
Post subject: Re: New NHS funded study shows up animal testing shambles [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 13:40:02 +0100, George <george12za RemoveThis @hotmail.com>
wrote:

>I see Animal Aid have been busy as ever.
>
>It's important we don't let the pro animal abuse loons take over the
>helm trying to keep this covered up.

Very good! I have passed this on to a number of others.




>
>
>http://www.animalaid.org.uk/
>
>New NHS funded study shows up animal testing shambles
>A just released survey of animal research funded by the NHS provides
>damning evidence - says national campaign group Animal Aid - that
>animal experiments aren't just cruel, they don't appear to work. The
>report (see link below) shows that:
>
>animal researchers don't talk to hospital doctors about their work
>clinical trials with human patients get underway even before the
>animal research is completed
>drugs that fail in animals are used in humans anyway
>a drug that increased overall mortality in animals was, nonetheless,
>used in people
>most of the animal research that was analysed was poorly conducted and
>gave conflicting results
>The survey compared the clinical (i.e. human) outcome of six medical
>treatments with the results obtained from experiments on animals. The
>areas of research related to head injuries, blood clotting, stroke,
>disease in premature babies and osteoporosis. Each of the six topics
>was analysed by systematic review. A systematic review is 'a summary
>of the medical literature that uses explicit methods to perform a
>thorough literature search and critical appraisal of individual
>studies and that uses appropriate statistical techniques to combine
>these valid studies'. In other words, systematic reviews normally
>represent the best available data.
>
>One systematic review looked at the use of steroids in treating people
>with severe head injuries. The NHS study showed that, whereas the
>animal experiments had provided mixed results, the drug clearly
>increased the risk of death in patients and had to be discontinued.
>
>Two other studies examined the effect of new drugs for the treatment
>of stroke. In both cases, the animal experiments showed that the drug
>improved the animals' condition after being deliberately brain
>damaged. In human patients, however, the drugs increased the risk of
>death, and one of them increased the risk of disability.
>
>Yet another systematic review looked at what effects steroids - given
>to pregnant animals - would have on the unborn. The aim of the
>experiments was to see whether the drug, given to pregnant women,
>could reduce the risk of mortality in premature babies whose lungs had
>not yet fully developed. Experiments conducted on monkeys, cattle and
>rabbits showed the drug treatment to have a positive effect on the
>lungs of the unborn. This outcome was also seen in the offspring of
>pregnant women. However, while the drug increased the risk of death in
>the unborn animals, it did not produce the same disastrous
>consequences in the developing human foetus.
>
>Says Andre Menache MRCVS, Scientific Consultant to Animal Aid:
>'This high-quality survey is very significant in the debate about
>whether or not animal experiments have any relevance to human
>medicine. The answer provided by this NHS-commissioned report is that,
>across a range of important human ailments, animal research provides
>misleading and conflicting information and is therefore dangerously
>unreliable.'
>
>.........................
>
>Notes to Editors
>
>For more information contact Andre Menache on 01732 364546
>View the full report. http://tinyurl.com/mzk2w
>
>
>
>
>www.animalaid.org.uk | site map | about us |
>
> Animal Aid campaigns peacefully against all animal abuse, and
>promotes a cruelty-free lifestyle. You can support our work by
>joining, making a donation, or using our online shop. Contact Animal
>Aid at The Old Chapel, Bradford Street, Tonbridge, Kent, TN9 1AW, UK,
>tel +44 (0)1732 364546, fax +44 (0)1732 366533, email
>info@animalaid.org.uk
>
>
>
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
George

External


Since: Apr 07, 2006
Posts: 7



(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 4:56 pm
Post subject: RSPB led Hedgehog cull strategy disputed [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm
Hedgehog cull strategy disputed
Claims that culling island hedgehogs is more humane than moving them
to the mainland have been disputed by experts.
Hedgehogs taken from the Outer Hebrides did not adversely affect
mainland populations, according to a study.

Bristol University scientists said the animals could be relocated
successfully after rehabilitation.

Environmental body Scottish Natural Heritage said it was taking the
study "quite seriously" and would discuss it at a forthcoming board
meeting.

The culling programme is run in the Uists by SNH, RSPB Scotland and
the Scottish Executive to combat the threat posed by hedgehogs to rare
wading birds and their eggs.


Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
carefully selected sites do extremely well
Les Stocker
Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital

Previous research suggested that moving the creatures to the mainland
could have a damaging effect on them, but this is disputed by the
eight-strong team of Bristol scientists, who monitored 109 hedgehogs
for the study.

The study, funded by Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital and the
International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), used radio monitoring to
compare the survival of hedgehogs taken from the Uists with those
released from wildlife hospitals and other wild hedgehogs nearby.

The survival of the Uist hedgehogs proved to be very similar to the
resident hedgehogs with the new animals quickly integrating into the
population.

Fresh data

Professor Stephen Harris, who co-ordinated the study, said: "This has
been an area of disagreement between welfare groups and SNH for some
time and SNH said they would like to see some fresh data.

"They have said they will look at it and we are hopeful this means an
end to culling and we can move forward."

Les Stocker, of Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital, said the study had
confirmed what anti-cull campaigners had long argued.

"Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
carefully selected sites do extremely well," he said.

"It is a crying shame that Scottish Natural Heritage has needlessly
killed 535 hedgehogs over the last three years."

'New science'

An SNH spokesman said: "We have seen the report and we are taking it
quite seriously. We are always open to new science on this matter.

"The project has drawn on previous research which has highlighted
serious welfare issues for translocated hedgehogs."

A paper on the study will be published in the journal Biological
Conservation.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm

Published: 2006/03/01 16:02:51 GMT

© BBC MMVI
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
George

External


Since: Jun 20, 2006
Posts: 1



(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 5:43 pm
Post subject: RSPB led Hedgehog cull strategy disputed [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm
Hedgehog cull strategy disputed
Claims that culling island hedgehogs is more humane than moving them
to the mainland have been disputed by experts.
Hedgehogs taken from the Outer Hebrides did not adversely affect
mainland populations, according to a study.

Bristol University scientists said the animals could be relocated
successfully after rehabilitation.

Environmental body Scottish Natural Heritage said it was taking the
study "quite seriously" and would discuss it at a forthcoming board
meeting.

The culling programme is run in the Uists by SNH, RSPB Scotland and
the Scottish Executive to combat the threat posed by hedgehogs to rare
wading birds and their eggs.


Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
carefully selected sites do extremely well
Les Stocker
Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital

Previous research suggested that moving the creatures to the mainland
could have a damaging effect on them, but this is disputed by the
eight-strong team of Bristol scientists, who monitored 109 hedgehogs
for the study.

The study, funded by Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital and the
International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), used radio monitoring to
compare the survival of hedgehogs taken from the Uists with those
released from wildlife hospitals and other wild hedgehogs nearby.

The survival of the Uist hedgehogs proved to be very similar to the
resident hedgehogs with the new animals quickly integrating into the
population.

Fresh data

Professor Stephen Harris, who co-ordinated the study, said: "This has
been an area of disagreement between welfare groups and SNH for some
time and SNH said they would like to see some fresh data.

"They have said they will look at it and we are hopeful this means an
end to culling and we can move forward."

Les Stocker, of Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital, said the study had
confirmed what anti-cull campaigners had long argued.

"Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
carefully selected sites do extremely well," he said.

"It is a crying shame that Scottish Natural Heritage has needlessly
killed 535 hedgehogs over the last three years."

'New science'

An SNH spokesman said: "We have seen the report and we are taking it
quite seriously. We are always open to new science on this matter.

"The project has drawn on previous research which has highlighted
serious welfare issues for translocated hedgehogs."

A paper on the study will be published in the journal Biological
Conservation.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm

Published: 2006/03/01 16:02:51 GMT

© BBC MMVI
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
amacmil304

External


Since: Feb 20, 2005
Posts: 46



(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 8:54 pm
Post subject: Re: RSPB led Hedgehog cull strategy disputed [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:56:33 +0100, George <george12za.DeleteThis@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Absolutely right. Yet the "experts" from SNH think differently
probably because killing hedgehogs is a nice little earner in the form
of grants. And Dr Paul Walton of the RSPB has suggested that wildlife
killers are thugs. Well, we've known that all along.





> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm
>Hedgehog cull strategy disputed
>Claims that culling island hedgehogs is more humane than moving them
>to the mainland have been disputed by experts.
>Hedgehogs taken from the Outer Hebrides did not adversely affect
>mainland populations, according to a study.
>
>Bristol University scientists said the animals could be relocated
>successfully after rehabilitation.
>
>Environmental body Scottish Natural Heritage said it was taking the
>study "quite seriously" and would discuss it at a forthcoming board
>meeting.
>
>The culling programme is run in the Uists by SNH, RSPB Scotland and
>the Scottish Executive to combat the threat posed by hedgehogs to rare
>wading birds and their eggs.
>
>
> Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
>carefully selected sites do extremely well
>Les Stocker
>Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital
>
>Previous research suggested that moving the creatures to the mainland
>could have a damaging effect on them, but this is disputed by the
>eight-strong team of Bristol scientists, who monitored 109 hedgehogs
>for the study.
>
>The study, funded by Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital and the
>International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), used radio monitoring to
>compare the survival of hedgehogs taken from the Uists with those
>released from wildlife hospitals and other wild hedgehogs nearby.
>
>The survival of the Uist hedgehogs proved to be very similar to the
>resident hedgehogs with the new animals quickly integrating into the
>population.
>
>Fresh data
>
>Professor Stephen Harris, who co-ordinated the study, said: "This has
>been an area of disagreement between welfare groups and SNH for some
>time and SNH said they would like to see some fresh data.
>
>"They have said they will look at it and we are hopeful this means an
>end to culling and we can move forward."
>
>Les Stocker, of Tiggywinkles Wildlife Hospital, said the study had
>confirmed what anti-cull campaigners had long argued.
>
>"Hedgehogs are ideal candidates for translocation and if released at
>carefully selected sites do extremely well," he said.
>
>"It is a crying shame that Scottish Natural Heritage has needlessly
>killed 535 hedgehogs over the last three years."
>
>'New science'
>
>An SNH spokesman said: "We have seen the report and we are taking it
>quite seriously. We are always open to new science on this matter.
>
>"The project has drawn on previous research which has highlighted
>serious welfare issues for translocated hedgehogs."
>
>A paper on the study will be published in the journal Biological
>Conservation.
>
>Story from BBC NEWS:
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/4763242.stm
>
>Published: 2006/03/01 16:02:51 GMT
>
>© BBC MMVI
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Geoff

External


Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32



(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:57 pm
Post subject: Bird Flu - A Virus of Our Own Hatching -Michael Greger, MD [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Foreword

by Kennedy Shortridge, PhD, DSc(Hon), CBiol, FIBiol
http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=115
Professor Emeritus Kennedy Shortridge
Professor Emeritus Kennedy Shortridge is credited for having first
discovered the H5N1 virus in Asia. As chair of the Department of
Microbiology at the University of Hong Kong, Dr. Shortridge led the
world’s first fight against the virus. For his pioneering work
studying flu viruses, which spans over three decades, he was awarded
the highly prestigious Prince Mahidol Award in Public Health,
considered the “Nobel Prize of Asia.”
Horse-drawn carts piled with dead bodies circulated through the small
town of Queensland, Australia. A nightmare to imagine, yet even more
horrific to learn that this scene was a recurring reality throughout
the world during the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic.

My mother’s compelling stories about the devastating reaches of the
pandemic have stayed with me since my earliest years. What started out
as a spark of interest has led me to search the hows and whys of
influenza pandemics through birds and mammals.

The world has seen unprecedented advances in science and technology
over the past 50 years, and, with it, a phenomenal increase in the
availability of food, especially meat protein, largely through the
intensification of poultry production in many parts of the world,
notably Asia. But at what cost?

Chicken, once consumed only on special occasions, has become a
near-daily staple on dinner tables around the world as a result of
animal agriculture practices that have dramatically changed the
landscape of farming by confining ever greater numbers of animals in
ever decreasing amounts of space. In China, the shift from small,
backyard poultry rearing toward industrialized animal agribusiness
began to take root in the early 1980s. In just two decades, Chinese
poultry farming has increasingly intensified—and has developed an
unintended by-product: the prospect of an influenza pandemic of
nightmarish proportions, one that could devastate humans, poultry, and
ecosystems around the world.

Influenza epidemics and pandemics are not new. Yet it wasn’t until
1982 that the late Professor Sir Charles Stuart-Harris and I put
forward the hypothesis that southern China is an epicentre for the
emergence of pandemic influenza viruses, the seeds for which had been
germinating for 4,500 years when it was believed the duck was first
domesticated in that region. This established the influenza virus gene
pool in southern China’s farmyards.

Indeed, molecular and genetic evidence suggests that the chicken is
not a natural host for influenza. Rather, the domestic duck is the
silent intestinal carrier of avian influenza viruses being raised in
close proximity to habitation.

It is the siting of large-scale chicken production units, particularly
in southern China where avian influenza viruses abound, that is the
crux of the problem. There, domestic ducks have been raised on rivers,
waterways, and, more recently, with the flooded rice crops cultivated
each year. The importation of industrial poultry farming into that
same region introduced millions of chickens—highly stressed due to
intensive production practices and unsanitary conditions—into this
avian influenza virus milieu. The result? An influenza accident
waiting to happen. The H5N1 virus signalled its appearance in Hong
Kong in 1997, and has since made its way into dozens of countries,
infected millions of birds, and threatens to trigger a human
catastrophe.

Michael Greger has taken on the formidable task of reviewing and
synthesizing the many factors contingent upon chicken production that
have brought us to the influenza threat the world now faces. Drawing
upon scientific literature and media reports at large, Dr. Greger
explores the hole we have dug for ourselves with our own unsavoury
practices.

Indeed, while governments and the poultry industry are quick to blame
migratory birds as the source of the current H5N1 avian influenza
virus, and to view pandemics as natural phenomena analogous to, say,
sunspots and earthquakes, in reality, human choices and actions may
have had—and may continue to have—a pivotal role in the changing
ecology. Now that anthropogenic behaviour has reached unprecedented
levels with a concomitant pronounced zoonotic skew in emerging
infectious diseases of humans, H5N1 seems like a cautionary tale of
how attempts to exploit nature may backfire. The use of antibiotics as
farm meal growth promoters leading to antibiotic-resistance in humans
or the feeding of meat or bone meal to cattle leading to mad cow
disease are cases in point: profitable in the short term for animal
agriculture, but with the potential for unforeseen and disastrous
consequences. Intensified, industrial poultry production has given us
inexpensive chicken, but at what cost to the animals and at what
heightened risk to public health?

We have reached a critical point. We must dramatically change animal
farming practices for all animals.

Michael Greger has achieved much in this volume. He has taken a major
step toward balancing humanity’s account with animals.

Kennedy F. Shortridge
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Geoff

External


Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32



(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:59 pm
Post subject: Bird Flu - A Virus of Our Own Hatching -Michael Greger, MD Introduction [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=114

"It was ‘the perfect storm’—a tempest that may happen only once in a
century—a nor’easter created by so rare a combination of factors that
it could not possibly have been worse. "
Sebastian Junger, The Perfect Storm: A True Story of Men Against the
Sea
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]

Most of us know the flu—influenza—as a nuisance disease, an annual
annoyance to be endured along with taxes, dentists, and visits with
the in-laws. Why worry about influenza when there are so many more
colorfully gruesome viruses out there like Ebola? Because influenza is
scientists’ top pick for humanity’s next killer plague. Up to 60
million Americans come down with the flu every year. What if it
suddenly turned deadly?

H5N1, the new killer strain of avian influenza spreading out of Asia,
has only killed about a hundred people as of mid-2006. In a world in
which millions die of diseases like malaria, tuberculosis, and AIDS,
why is there so much concern about bird flu?

Because it’s happened before. Because an influenza pandemic in 1918
became the deadliest plague in human history, killing up to 100
million people around the world. Because the 1918 flu virus was likely
a bird flu virus. Because that virus made more than a quarter of all
Americans ill and killed more people in 25 weeks than AIDS has killed
in 25 years—yet in 1918, the case mortality rate was less than 5%.
H5N1, on the other hand, has officially killed half of its human
victims.

H5N1 took its first human life in Hong Kong in 1997 and has since
rampaged west to Russia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe. It
remains almost exclusively a disease of birds, but as the virus has
spread, it has continued to mutate. It has developed greater lethality
and enhanced environmental stability, and has begun taking more
species under its wing. Influenza viruses don’t typically kill mammals
like rodents, but experiments have shown that the latest H5N1 mutants
can kill 100% of infected mice, practically dissolving their lungs.
The scientific world has never seen anything like it. We’re facing an
unprecedented outbreak of an unpredictable virus.

Currently in humans, H5N1 is good at killing, but not at spreading.
There are three essential conditions necessary to produce a pandemic.
First, a new virus must arise from an animal reservoir, such that
humans have no natural immunity to it. Second, the virus must evolve
to be capable of killing human beings efficiently. Third, the virus
must succeed in jumping efficiently from one human to the next. For
the virus, it’s one small step to man, but one giant leap to mankind.
So far, conditions one and two have been met in spades. Three strikes
and we’re out. If the virus triggers a human pandemic, it will not be
peasant farmers in Vietnam dying after handling dead birds or raw
poultry—it will be New Yorkers, Parisians, Londoners, and people in
every city, township, and village in the world dying after shaking
someone’s hand, touching a doorknob, or simply inhaling in the wrong
place at the wrong time.

Mathematical models suggest that it might be possible to snuff out an
emerging flu pandemic at the source if caught early enough, but
practical considerations may render this an impossibility. Even if we
were able to stamp it out, as long as the same underlying conditions
remain, the virus would presumably soon pop back up again, just as it
has in the past.

This book explores what those underlying conditions are. The current
dialogue surrounding avian influenza speaks of a potential H5N1
pandemic as if it were a natural phenomenon—like hurricanes,
earthquakes, or even a “viral asteroid on a collision course with
humanity” —which we couldn’t hope to control. The reality, however, is
that the next pandemic may be more of an unnatural disaster of our own
design.

Since the mid-1970s, previously unknown diseases have surfaced at a
pace unheard of in the annals of medicine—more than 30 new diseases in
30 years, most of them newly discovered viruses. The concept of
“emerging infectious diseases” used to be a mere curiosity in the
field of medicine; now it’s an entire discipline. Where are these
diseases coming from?

According to the Smithsonian Institution, there have been three great
disease transitions in human history. The first era of human disease
began with the acquisition of diseases from domesticated animals, such
as tuberculosis, measles, the common cold—and influenza. The second
era came with the Industrial Revolution of the 18th and 19th
centuries, resulting in an epidemic of the so-called “diseases of
civilization,” such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. We
are now entering the third age of human disease, which started around
30 years ago—described by medical historians as the age of “the
emerging plagues.” Never in medical history have so many new diseases
appeared in so short a time. An increasingly broad consensus of
infectious disease specialists has concluded that nearly all of the
ever more frequent emergent disease episodes in the United States and
elsewhere over the past few years have, in fact, come to us from
animals. Their bugs are worse than their bite.

In poultry, bird flu has gone from an exceedingly rare disease to one
that crops up every year. The number of serious outbreaks in the first
few years of the 21st century has already exceeded the total number of
outbreaks recorded for the entire 20th century. Bird flu seems to be
undergoing evolution in fast-forward.

The increase in chicken outbreaks has gone hand-in-hand with increased
transmission to humans. A decade ago, human infection with bird flu
was essentially unheard of. Since H5N1 emerged in 1997, though,
chicken viruses H9N2 infected children in China in 1999 and 2003, H7N2
infected residents of New York and Virginia in 2002 and 2003, H7N7
infected people in the Netherlands in 2003, and H7N3 infected poultry
workers in Canada in 2004 and a British farmer in 2006. The bird flu
virus in the Netherlands outbreak infected more than a thousand
people. What has changed in recent years that could account for this
disturbing trend?

All bird flu viruses seem to start out harmless to both birds and
people. In its natural state, the influenza virus has existed for
millions of years as an innocuous, intestinal, waterborne infection of
aquatic birds such as ducks. If the true home of influenza viruses is
the gut of wild waterfowl, the human lung is a long way from home. How
does a waterfowl’s intestinal bug end up in a human cough?
Free-ranging flocks and wild birds have been blamed for the recent
emergence of H5N1, but people have kept chickens in their backyards
for thousands of years, and birds have been migrating for millions.

In a sense, pandemics aren’t born—they’re made. H5N1 may be a virus of
our own hatching coming home to roost. According to a spokesperson for
the World Health Organization, “The bottom line is that humans have to
think about how they treat their animals, how they farm them, and how
they market them—basically the whole relationship between the animal
kingdom and the human kingdom is coming under stress.” Along with
human culpability, though, comes hope. If changes in human behavior
can cause new plagues, changes in human behavior may prevent them in
the future.
 >> Stay informed about: Bird Flu - Public's Health Threatened by Government's Pro-.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Geoff

External


Since: Sep 17, 2006
Posts: 32



(Msg. 12) Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 9:01 pm
Post subject: Bird Flu - A Virus of Our Own Hatching -Michael Greger, MD I. Storm Gathering [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

http://birdflubook.com/a.php?id=114

“Humanity has but three great enemies: fever, famine and war; of these
by far the greatest, by far the most terrible, is fever.”
—Sir William Osler3
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]
Emergency hospital during 1918 pandemic, Kansas
It started, harmlessly enough, with a cough drowned out by the raging
world war. It was known as Spanish influenza only because censorship
by the warring governments wouldn’t allow reports of the spreading
illness for fear it would damage morale.4 However, Spain, being
neutral, allowed its press to publicize what was happening. The first
cable read, “A STRANGE FORM OF DISEASE OF EPIDEMIC CHARACTER HAS
APPEARED IN MADRID.” Because of the censors, even as millions were
dying around the globe, the world press was apt to report little about
the pandemic beyond what the Spanish King Alfonzo’s temperature was
that morning.5 In Spain they called it the French flu.6

“The year 1918 has gone,” the editors of the Journal of the American
Medical Association wrote in the Christmas issue, “a year momentous as
the termination of the most cruel war in the annals of the human race;
a year which marked the end, at least for a time, of man’s destruction
of man; unfortunately a year in which developed a most fatal
infectious disease….”7 That most fatal disease killed about 10 times
more Americans than did the war.8 In fact, according to the World
Health Organization (WHO), “The 1918 influenza pandemic killed more
people in less time than any other disease before or since,”9 the
“most deadly disease event in the history of humanity….”10

The word “epidemic” comes from the Greek epi, meaning “upon,” and
demos, meaning “people.” The word “pandemic” comes from the Greek word
pandemos, meaning “upon all the people.”11 Most outbreaks of disease
are geographically confined, just like most disasters in general.
Wars, famines, earthquakes, and acts of terror, for example, tend to
be localized both in time and space. We look on in horror, but may not
be affected ourselves. Pandemics are different. Pandemics are
worldwide epidemics. They happen everywhere at once, coast to coast,
and can drag on for more than a year.12 “With Hurricane Katrina,
people opened their homes, sent checks and people found safe havens,”
writes a global economic strategist at a leading investment firm, but
with a pandemic, “there is nowhere to turn, no safe place to
evacuate.”13

The word “influenza” derives from the Italian influentia, meaning
“influence,” reflecting a medieval belief that astrological forces
were behind the annual flu season.14 In 1918, though, the Germans
called it Blitzkatarrh.15 To the Siamese, it was Kai Wat Yai, The
Great Cold Fever.16 In Hungary, it was The Black Whip. In Cuba and the
Philippines, it was Trancazo, meaning “a blow from a heavy stick.” In
the United States, it was the Spanish Lady, or, because of the way
many died, the Purple Death.

Purple Death
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]
Influenza ward in army general hospital, Fort Porter, New York
(National Archives, 165-WW-269-B-4)
What started for millions around the globe as muscle aches and a fever
ended days later with many victims bleeding from their nostrils, ears,
and eye sockets.17 Some bled inside their eyes;18 some bled around
them.19 They vomited blood and coughed it up.20 Purple blood blisters
appeared on their skin.21

The Chief of the Medical Services, Major Walter V. Brem, described the
horror at the time in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
He wrote that “often blood was seen to gush from a patient’s nose and
mouth.”22 In some cases, blood reportedly spurted with such force as
to squirt several feet.23 “When pneumonia appeared,” Major Brem
recounted, “the patients often spat quantities of almost pure
blood.”24 They were bleeding into their lungs.

As victims struggled to clear their airways of the bloody froth that
poured from their lungs, their bodies started to turn blue from the
lack of oxygen, a condition known as violaceous heliotrope cyanosis.25
“They’re as blue as huckleberries and spitting blood,” one New York
City physician told a colleague.26 U.S. Army medics noted that this
was “not the dusky pallid blueness that one is accustomed to in
failing pneumonia, but rather [a] deep blueness…an indigo blue
color.”27 The hue was so dark that one physician confessed that “it is
hard to distinguish the colored men from the white.”28 “It is only a
matter of a few hours then until death comes,” recalled another
physician, “and it is simply a struggle for air until they
suffocate.”29 They drowned in their own bloody secretions.30

“It wasn’t always that quick, either,” one historian adds. “And along
the way, you had symptoms like fingers and genitals turning black, and
people reporting being able to literally smell the body decaying
before the patient died.”31 “When you’re ill like that you don’t
care,” recalls one flu survivor, now 100 years old. “You don’t care if
you live or die.”32

Major Brem described an autopsy: “Frothy, bloody serum poured from the
nose and mouth when the body was moved, or the head lowered…. Pus
streamed from the trachea when the lungs were removed.”33 Fellow
autopsy surgeons discussed what they called a “pathological
nightmare,” with lungs up to six times their normal weight, looking
“like melted red currant jelly.”34 An account published by the
National Academies of Science describes the lungs taken from victims
as “hideously transformed” from light, buoyant, air-filled structures
to dense sacks of bloody fluid.35

There was one autopsy finding physicians reported having never seen
before. As people choked to death, violently coughing up as much as
two pints of yellow-green pus per day,36 their lungs would sometimes
burst internally, forcing air under pressure up underneath their skin.
In the Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, a British
physician noted “one thing that I have never seen before—namely the
occurrence of subcutaneous emphysema”—pockets of air accumulating just
beneath the skin—“beginning in the neck and spreading sometimes over
the whole body.”37 These pockets of air leaking from ruptured lungs
made patients crackle when they rolled onto their sides. In an unaired
interview filmed for a PBS American Experience documentary on the 1918
pandemic, one Navy nurse compared the sound to a bowl of Rice
Krispies. The memory of that sound—the sound of air bubbles moving
under people’s skin—remained so vivid that for the rest of her life,
she couldn’t be in a room with anyone eating that popping cereal.38

“[A] dead man has no substance unless one has actually seen him dead;
a hundred million corpses broadcast through history are no more than a
puff of smoke in the imagination.”
—Albert Camus, The Plague39
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]
Percent of population dying in U.S. cities
In 1918, half the world became infected and 25% of all Americans fell
ill.40 Unlike the regular seasonal flu, which tends to kill only the
elderly and infirm, the flu virus of 1918 killed those in the prime of
life Public health specialists at the time noted that most influenza
victims were those who “had been in the best of physical condition and
freest from previous disease.”41 Ninety-nine percent of excess deaths
were among people under 65 years old.42 Mortality peaked in the 20- to
34-year-old age group.43 Women under 35 accounted for 70% of all
female influenza deaths. In 1918, the average life expectancy in the
United States dropped precipitously to only 37 years.44

Calculations made in the 1920s estimated the global death toll in the
vicinity of 20 million, a figure medical historians now consider
“almost ludicrously low.”45 The number has been revised upwards ever
since, as more and more records are unearthed. The best estimate
currently stands at 50 to 100 million people dead.46 In some
communities, like in Alaska, 50% of the population perished.47

The 1918 influenza pandemic killed more people in a single year than
the bubonic plague (“black death”) in the Middle Ages killed in a
century.48 The 1918 virus killed more people in 25 weeks than AIDS has
killed in 25 years.49 According to one academic reviewer, this
“single, brief epidemic generated more fatalities, more suffering, and
more demographic change in the United States than all the wars of the
Twentieth Century.”50

In September 1918, according to the official published American
Medican Association (AMA) account, the deadliest wave of the pandemic
spread over the world “like a tidal wave.”51 On the 11th, Washington
officials disclosed that it had reached U.S. shores.52 September 11,
1918—the day Babe Ruth led the Boston Red Sox to victory in the World
Series—three civilians dropped dead on the sidewalks of neighboring
Quincy, Massachusetts.53 It had begun.

When a “typical outbreak” struck Camp Funston in Kansas, the
commander, a physician and former Army Chief of Staff, wrote the
governor, “There are 1440 minutes in a day. When I tell you there were
1440 admissions in a day, you realize the strain put on our Nursing
and Medical forces….”54 “Stated briefly,” summarized an Army report,
“the influenza…occurred as an explosion.”55

October 1918 became the deadliest month in U.S. history56 and the last
week of October was the deadliest week from any cause, at any time.
More than 20,000 Americans died in that week alone.57 Numbers, though,
cannot reflect the true horror of the time.

“They died in heaps and were buried in heaps.”
—Daniel Defoe, 1665
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]
Mass graves being dug in 1918
One survivor remembers the children. “We had little caskets for the
little babies that stretched for four and five blocks, eight high, ten
high.”58 Soon, though, city after city ran out of caskets.59 People
were dying faster than carpenters could make them.60 The dead lay in
gutters.61 One agonized official in the stricken East sent an urgent
warning West: “Hunt up your wood-workers and set them to making
coffins. Then take your street laborers and set them to digging
graves.”62 When New York City ran out of gravediggers, they had to
follow Philadelphia’s example and use steam shovels to dig trenches
for mass graves.63 Even in timber-rich Sweden, the dead were interred
in cardboard boxes or piled in mass graves because they simply ran out
of nails.64

Another survivor recalls:

A neighbor boy about seven or eight died and they used to just pick
you up and wrap you up in a sheet and put you in a patrol wagon. So
the mother and father are screaming, “Let me get a macaroni
box”—macaroni, any kind of pasta, used to come in this box, about 20
pounds of macaroni fit in it— “please, please let me put him in a
macaroni box, don’t take him away like that….”65
One nurse describes bodies “stacked in the morgue from floor to
ceiling like cordwood.” At the peak of the epidemic, she remembers
toe-tagging and wrapping more than one still-living patient in winding
sheets. In her nightmares, she wondered “what it would feel like to be
that boy who was at the bottom of the cordwood in the morgue.”66

They brought out their dead. Corpses were carted away in anything,
wheelbarrows—even garbage trucks.67 Often, though, the bodies were
just pushed into corners and left to rot for days. People too sick to
move were discovered lying next to corpses.68

All over the country, farms and factories shut down and schools and
churches closed. Homeless children wandered the streets, their parents
vanished.69 The New York Health Commissioner estimated that in New
York City alone, 21,000 children lost both parents to the pandemic.70

Around the world, millions were left widowed and orphaned.71 The New
York Times described Christmas in Tahiti.72 “It was impossible to bury
the dead,” a Tahitian government official noted. “Day and night trucks
rumbled throughout the streets filled with bodies for the constantly
burning pyres.”73 When firewood to burn the bodies ran out in India,
the rivers became clogged with corpses.74 In the remote community of
Okak, in northern Labrador, an eight-year-old girl reportedly survived
for five weeks at 20 below zero—among the corpses of her family. She
kept herself alive by melting snow for water with the last of her
Christmas candles while she lay listening to the sound of dogs outside
feasting off the dead.75 Colonel Victor Vaughan, acting Surgeon
General of the Army and former head of the AMA, lived through the
pandemic. “If the epidemic continues its mathematical rate of
acceleration,” Vaughan wrote in 1918, “civilization could easily
disappear from the face of the earth.”76

But the virus did stop. It ran out of human fuel; it ran out of
accessible people to infect. Those who lived through it were immune to
reinfection, so many populations were, in many respects, either immune
or dead. “[I]t’s like a firestorm,” one expert explained. “[I]t sweeps
through and it has so many victims and the survivors developed
immunity.”77 Influenza is “transmitted so effectively,” reads one
virology textbook, “that it exhausts the supply of susceptible
hosts.”78

As soon as the dying stopped, the forgetting began. As Arno Karlen
wrote in Man and Microbes, “Many Americans know more about mediaeval
plague than about the greatest mass death in their grandparents’
lives.”79 Commentators view the pandemic as so traumatic that it had
to be forced out of our collective memory and history. “I think it’s
probably because it was so awful while it was happening, so
frightening,” one epidemiologist speculates, “that people just got rid
of the memory.”80

For many, however, the virus lived on. As if the pandemic weren’t
tragic enough, in the decade that followed, a million people came down
with a serious Parkinson’s-like disease termed “encephalitis
lethargica,” the subject of the book and movie Awakenings.81 Some
researchers now consider this epidemic of neurological disease to be
“almost certainly” a direct consequence of viral damage to the brains
of survivors.82 The latest research goes a step further to suggest the
pandemic had ripples throughout the century, showing that those in
utero at the height of the pandemic in the most affected areas seemed
to have stunted lifespans and lifelong physical disability.83

“This is a detective story. Here was a mass murderer that was around
80 years ago and who’s never been brought to justice. And what we’re
trying to do is find the murderer.”
—Jeffery Taubenberger, molecular pathologist and arche-virologist84
[Click here for a printer-friendly version of this page]
Johan Hultin and Mary
Where did this disease come from? Popular explanations at the time
included a covert German biological weapon, the foul atmosphere
conjured by the war’s rotting corpses and mustard gas, or “spiritual
malaise due to the sins of war and materialism.”85 This was before the
influenza virus was discovered, we must remember, and is consistent
with other familiar etymological examples—malaria was contracted from
mal and aria (“bad air”) or such quaintly preserved terms as catching
“a cold” and being “under the weather.”86 The committee set up by the
American Public Health Association to investigate the 1918 outbreak
could only speak of a “disease of extreme communicability.”87 Though
the “prevailing disease is generally known as influenza,” they
couldn’t even be certain that this was the same disease that had been
previously thought of as such.88 As the Journal of the American
Medical Association observed in October 1918, “The ‘influence’ in
influenza is still veiled in mystery.”89

In the decade following 1918, thousands of books and papers were
written on influenza in a frenzied attempt to characterize the
pathogen. One of the most famous medical papers of all time, Alexander
Fleming’s “On the Antibacterial Actions of Cultures of Penicillium,”
reported an attempt to isolate the bug that caused influenza. The full
title was “On the Antibacterial Actions of Cultures of Penicillium,
with Special Reference to Their Use in the Isolation of B.
Influenzae.” Fleming was hoping he could use penicillin to kill off
all the contaminant bystander bacteria on the culture plate so he
could isolate the bug that caused influenza. The possibility of
treating humans with penicillin was mentioned only in passing at the
end of the paper.90

The cause of human influenza was not found until 1933, when a British
research team finally isolated and identified the viral culprit.91
What they discovered, though, was a virus that caused the typical
seasonal flu. Scientists still didn’t understand where the flu virus
of 1918 came from or why it was so deadly. It would be more than a
half-century before molecular biological techniques would be developed
and refined enough to begin to answer these questions; but by then
where would researchers find 1918 tissue samples to study the virus?

The U.S. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology originated almost 150
years ago. It came into being during the Civil War, created by an
executive order from Abraham Lincoln to the Army Surgeon General to
study diseases in the battlefield.92 It houses literally tens of
millions of pieces of preserved human tissue, the largest collection
of its kind in the world.93 This is where civilian pathologist Jeffery
Taubenberger first went to look for tissue samples in the mid ’90s. If
he could find enough fragments of the virus he felt he might be able
to decipher the genetic code and perhaps even resurrect the 1918 virus
for study, the viral equivalent of bringing dinosaurs back to life in
Jurassic Park.94

He found remnants of two soldiers who succumbed to the 1918 flu on the
same day in September—a 21-year-old private who died in South Carolina
and a 30-year-old private who died in upstate New York. Tiny cubes of
lung tissue preserved in wax were all that remained. Taubenberger’s
team shaved off microscopic sections and started hunting for the virus
using the latest advances in modern molecular biology that he himself
had helped devise. They found the virus, but only in tiny bits and
pieces.95

The influenza virus has eight gene segments, a genetic code less than
14,000 letters long (the human genome, in contrast, has several
billion). The longest stands of RNA (the virus’s genetic material)
that Taubenberger could find in the soldiers’ tissue were only about
130 letters long. He needed more tissue.96

The 1918 pandemic littered the Earth with millions of corpses. How
hard could it be to find more samples? Unfortunately, refrigeration
was essentially nonexistent in 1918, a