|
Related Topics:
| Answer the questions, fat child molesting queer - Does the UK commit abuse of by not requiring them to stay in school until age 18? (Children may leave school there at age 16.) If those children who leave at age 16 become employed, is the UK in violation of treaty
Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and go.. - JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and Jethro wrote, "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to raise it at rephrase that - is it better to raise an animal to consume (wider..
Why is JethroUK so horribly afraid to answer simple and go.. - JethroUK, clearly a coward, keeps EVADING simple and Jethro wrote, "is it better to raise an animal to eat, or not to raise it at rephrase that - is it better to raise an animal to consume (wider..
JethroFW, idiot ordinaire, laid it all out for us before - The twitty little said all he needed to say last summer: most animals that *are* eaten, were born to be eaten - such that the said animals would never have life at all had it not that they be eaten 06/21/03 ..
Karen Winter's sleazy self-justification, and her failure .. - I found this little nugget from Karen, back in the days leading up to her weepy is Ash The context, then as now, is animal deaths, and why are morally over the issue. ..
|
|
|
Next: Animals Rights: JethroFW, idiot ordinaire, laid it all out for us before
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2003 Posts: 869
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun May 16, 2004 7:30 pm
Post subject: Answer the questions, JethroFW Archived from groups: alt>food>vegan, others (more info?)
|
|
|
They are good and necessary questions, JethroFW. Don't
evade them; answer them. Don't lie, either; answer
them honestly.
Why do you think the factlette that livestock "only"
live because we breed them to consume them merits any
consideration? EVERYONE is already aware of it, so it
couldn't be that you thought perhaps some weren't. You
are posting in alt.philosophy, so presumably you think
it's a *philosophical* importance. What is it,
JethroFW? Do not repeat your evasion: that it's
important because it's a fact. I have already
acknowledged that it's a fact; a factlette, actually.
That is not in dispute, and that logically cannot be
the reason you emphasize it so often. There must be
some other, philosophical reason. What is it, JethroFW?
For whom or what is it "better"/"more moral" that
livestock "get to experience life"?
Why have you evaded, for over a week, answering these
two very good and very necessary questions, JethroFW?
Are you afraid of answering them? >> Stay informed about: Answer the questions, JethroFW |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|